Posted on Aug 27, 2013 by
Happy Rhino
What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Try to acquire lock with timeout = 0
What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Timeout=0 should behave the same as timeout=0.0001 or whatever. Instead, it treats timeout=0 as timeout=None, thus disabling the feature.
Comment #1
Posted on Aug 27, 2013 by Happy RhinoI submitted a pull request for this.
Comment #2
Posted on Aug 27, 2013 by Grumpy LionI already fixed this, just hasn't been pushed yet.
Status: Duplicate
Labels:
Type-Defect
Priority-Medium