Posted on Sep 28, 2012 by
Massive Panda
-w gives a warning if a constructor symbol in the lhs of a rule hasn't been declared yet. Maybe we should only emit this warning for symbols on the rhs?
Comment #1
Posted on Nov 13, 2012 by Massive PandaMaybe it's actually better to keep it the way it is, so that constructor symbols on the lhs of an equation may be cross-checked against declarations. The warning is only mildly annoying, but provides some extra safety.
Status: WontFix
Labels:
Type-Defect
Priority-Low