What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. define type abstract 2. update type with CI file where abstract flag is not defined
What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Expected is, that the type is not abstract. But instead the type is abstract.
Comment #1
Posted on May 16, 2010 by Quick Camel(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #2
Posted on May 16, 2010 by Quick Camelsolved with r797
Comment #3
Posted on May 30, 2010 by Quick Camelversion 0.10.0 is released
Comment #4
Posted on Feb 7, 2014 by Quick Lion(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #5
Posted on Feb 7, 2014 by Quick Lion(No comment was entered for this change.)
Status: Done
Labels:
Type-Defect
Component-Update
Priority-Medium
Version-0.10.0
Status-Done
MigrationStatus-Done