New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow lists of comma-separated attributes after a type name to be consistent with other C-family languages #254
Comments
Reported by @umple on 2013-05-01 02:04:27
|
Essentially this should just require modifying the parser to generate new tokens, then Integer a; Testing should be done for a list of three or more items, different Umple datatypes, Reported by @umple on 2013-05-01 02:06:55 |
A few issues prevent this to be as straighforward as it should be. The main one being:
Since the current rules for attributes use the [type,name>1,0] clause, this (supposed) complexAttribute- : [=unique]? [=lazy]? [=modifier:immutable|settable|internal|defaulted|const]? As this is marked as low-priority, I'll wait for the confirmation from a different Reported by |
I have raised the priority of this, as it should be doable and would be useful Reported by @umple on 2014-09-05 14:51:18
|
Reported by @umple on 2014-09-05 14:51:38
|
I have raised the priority of this issue since it has been around for a very, very long time! Twice others have opened duplicates. |
Originally reported on Google Code with ID 355
Owned by @howzlife
Allow
class X {
Integer a,b;
}
and
class X {
Integer a, b;
}
to initialize two variables.
Currently the former raises error 130 and the latter generates 'extra code'.. This
is to be consistent with C-family languages
Reported by @umple on 2012-11-21 20:06:45
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: