| Issue 3: | Needs to minimize memory usage |
1 of 73
Next ›
|
| 9 people starred this issue and may be notified of changes. | Back to list |
Posted by motienko at 2005-08-04 19:49:28 PyICQ-t on FreeBSD 5.4 SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 1 connected user 17580K 12564K kserel 1:40 0.00% 0.00% python 2 connected users 18036K 12876K kserel 1:40 0.00% 0.00% python 3 connected users 18296K 13236K kserel 1:41 0.00% 0.00% python 4 connected users 18448K 13492K kserel 1:42 0.00% 0.00% python JIT with 59 connected users 13328K 9496K poll 14:53 0.00% 0.00% jabberd-jit Is it possible to minimize memory usage? Maybe some python options can do that? Posted by motienko at 2005-08-04 20:04:51 update: After disconnection of all users memory usage is bigger . 18792K 13564K kserel 1:43 0.00% 0.00% python After restarting and zero users online it is: 9828K 7980K select 0:01 3.47% 1.66% python I guess memory leak is somewhere. Posted by maxbritov at 2005-08-05 08:50:46 Confirm issue! I just test with my online/offline switching and log top's report. Virt / Res / Shr 47108 / 6112 / 1928 79964 / 6248 / 1928 - online 79964 / 6248 / 1928 - offline 47180 / 6216 / 1928 - waiting in offline 63652 / 6408 / 1928 - online 55456 / 6408 / 1928 - waiting in online 55456 / 6408 / 1928 - offline 47260 / 6400 / 1928 - waiting in offline 71912 / 6592 / 1928 - online 47324 / 6604 / 1928 - waiting in online Posted by jadestorm at 2005-08-08 03:29:11 This is a repeat of bug 56 ... Posted by jadestorm at 2005-12-14 16:21:46 http://www.blathersource.org/bugs_view.php?projid=pyicq-t&bugid=56 (I closed the other bug since this has more info) Posted by jadestorm at 2006-03-25 16:10:12 I'm open for any suggestions anyone might have for this. I can't figure out how to really DO anything about Python memory usage as it holds onto memory that it's not even using anymore. (keeps it in a pool for later use) Posted by avb at 2006-12-09 18:12:11 http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/1495 it seems that the problem looks like that. The problem is very urgent. i need to reboot icq transport on jabber.org.by twice a day. Hope that tomorrow i will provide more information Posted by jadestorm at 2006-12-09 18:13:36 I'm open to patches! I haven't had time to work on PyICQt as of late. Posted by avb at 2006-12-10 01:12:37 i'm examining code now. Hope i will find a problem soon. Posted by guest at 2007-05-23 09:00:13 Have anybody solution? pyicqt drives me mad :((
Jun 27, 2008
#1
vsviri...@gmail.com
Jun 27, 2008
I get ~256 megs on start up with 5 users in the spool, not all of them connected... This is quite insane memory consumption.
Feb 7, 2009
Hey ho - some bugfix available??
Mar 15, 2009
It is important to correct the memory leak. Memory consumption in quantities not allowed. At the moment version 8.1.3 Transport consumption by 20 users connected 659 Mb
Mar 20, 2009
I tried to run PyICQt on OpenVZ VE node but it failed. Problem with memory consumption is very actual. 1,3G memory for ~ 50 connected users.
Jun 7, 2009
170 Mb memory usage for 1 day with 10-20 users online. It's abnormal...
Jul 21, 2009
I confirm the same behavior with twisted 8.2, with just few tens of users the memory consumption never decreases until the transports dies |