| Issue 109: | Send authorization request only when requested from the client | |
| 2 people starred this issue and may be notified of changes. | Back to list |
Posted by guest at 2006-03-19 13:43:08 Is this possible? I decided to move away from ICQ clients and use my ICQ account through a jabber transport, but I have the problem that I have a lot of people in my "Awaiting authorization" list, and when I tried it for the first time (It was 0.6 version) they were flooded with auth requests. As of 0.6, even those that were accepted continued to be in the "Awaiting authorization" list on the server. I got the SVN version for other bugs, but it seems that this hasn't changed, so I submit this request So far, the best way to stop the transport from flooding many people is to comment out the lines that send the auth requests. Posted by jadestorm at 2006-03-19 17:36:59 If you don't allow the reception of the auth requests, then lots of things are not going to work right with pyicq. The jabber side has to know about the people in question. The initial flood of auth requests is, sadly, a fact of life. There's not really any good official mechanisms of handling such instances. James submitted roster-subsync, but it was rejected. There's something else but I'm not aware of clients that really support it. James wrote a "webreg" thing that you can find at msn-transport.jabberstudio.org that will handle all of the auth requests though. Basically if you use the webreg tool to register with the transport, it'll handle all of the requests itself. Or are you referring to a reverse scenario? Why don't the people on the other end just authorize you? =D I'm confused. Posted by guest at 2006-03-20 17:28:56 Hm, well, can't the transport get list of people in question without the initial flood? And can't the transport send an authorization request only when I send an authorization request from the client? > Why don't the people on the other end just authorize you? I'm having trouble with this one. Because of the bugs with the ICQ client I'm using, sometimes I remain unauthorized by them. The same was true about the old version of pyicq-t, if this is fixed in the SVN it'll do, but I'm still scared of the initial flood and I'm not sure if I want to try. And there are lots of people that I don't want authorization from (or won't give me), who I don't want to flood, I could delete some of them, but that is not an easy task. Posted by jadestorm at 2006-03-21 13:14:32 I think we may be having a miscommunication about this. Perhaps we can chat about this "live" (via jabber) instead?
Aug 1, 2009
#1
goose...@quantentunnel.de
Aug 7, 2009
Psi have option "Auto-authorize contacts". Gajim do it automatically. Not sure about other clients.
Owner:
r000nster
Aug 8, 2009
When I turn on the "Auto-authorize contacts" option in Psi, all my contacts receives the message "You have added" from me every time when I adding pyicqt to roster. This is not so good, I think must be an option in pyicqt to request or no-request autorization when adding contact. |