Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate if test case always should be prepared for test #182

Closed
johanhaleby opened this issue Jul 23, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Investigate if test case always should be prepared for test #182

johanhaleby opened this issue Jul 23, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement imported Priority:High

Comments

@johanhaleby
Copy link
Collaborator

From johan.ha...@gmail.com on September 11, 2009 14:57:43

To always produce the same result when it comes to suppressing constructors
and perhaps in the future mocking new using the new keyword (see previous
issue)

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/powermock/issues/detail?id=162
@johanhaleby
Copy link
Collaborator Author

From johan.ha...@gmail.com on September 22, 2009 11:20:01

Test case is automatically prepared since version 1.3

Status: Fixed
Labels: -Type-Task Type-Enhancement

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement imported Priority:High
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@johanhaleby