| Issue 7: | RET instruction needs a stack increment | |
| 1 person starred this issue and may be notified of changes. | Back to list |
When using the stack to pass parameters to a procedure, it would be most helpful to have an optional stack pointer increment beyond what occurs with the ret. This would allow for a more elegant calling/post calling sequence to keep stack utilization in synch. Example: RET 2 ; clear SP of two parameters |