My favorites | Sign in
Project Home Issues Source
READ-ONLY: This project has been archived. For more information see this post.
Search
for
  Advanced search   Search tips   Subscriptions
Issue 7: RET instruction needs a stack increment
1 person starred this issue and may be notified of changes. Back to list
 
Project Member Reported by h.paul.h...@gmail.com, Feb 18, 2014
When using the stack to pass parameters to a procedure, it would be most helpful to have an optional stack pointer increment beyond what occurs with the ret.  This would allow for a more elegant calling/post calling sequence to keep stack utilization in synch.

Example:    RET 2    ; clear SP of two parameters



Powered by Google Project Hosting