Consider adding ImageIO to the JVM White List [35884083]

Infeasible

Feature Request

More Info Required

Status Update

No update yet.

Description

an...@gmail.com

created issue #1

Apr 11, 2009 11:07AM

When trying to use the RichFaces component library (3.1.6) on GAE, (under
JSF 1.1), I got the following exception. Would it be possible to add
javax.imageio.ImageIO to the JVM White List?

Thanks for your time.

Andy J.

----

Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax.imageio.ImageIO is a
restricted class. Please see the Google App Engine developer's guide for
more details.
at
com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.shared.stub.javax.imageio.ImageIO.<clinit>(ImageIO.java)
at
org.ajax4jsf.resource.ResourceBuilderImpl.<clinit>(ResourceBuilderImpl.java:110)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at
org.ajax4jsf.resource.InternetResourceBuilder.getInstance(InternetResourceBuilder.java:148)
at
org.ajax4jsf.renderkit.ChameleonRenderKitFactory.<init>(ChameleonRenderKitFactory.java:62)
... 40 more

Comments

le...@gmail.com <le...@gmail.com> #2Apr 15, 2009 05:24AM

I need imageio to use the geotiff-jai library for extracting GeoTIFF tags so I can
create a KML server.

le...@gmail.com <le...@gmail.com> #3Apr 15, 2009 05:45AM

Also the native implementation of javax.imageio and the associated Sun jai-imageio
stuff eg com.sun.media.imageio.plugins.*.

This will significantly speed up image processing and will reduce used CPU hours/load
(which will be beneficial to Google too)

to...@google.com <to...@google.com> #4Apr 23, 2009 08:17PM

Assigned to to...@google.com.

How about using a pure Java imaging library? For example, is anybody willing to try
Sanselan and see if it meets their needs?

http://incubator.apache.org/sanselan/site/index.html

le...@gmail.com <le...@gmail.com> #5Apr 25, 2009 09:21AM

Thanks for that link sounds interesting.

It's amazing what you can find on Apache these days!

Hmm, it could be very usefull for people after a pure Java replacement for ImageIO.

Pnly problem I have is that it doesn't have a GeoTIFF wrapper, but I'm sure that
won't be too hard.

May I suggest a wiki page be created with a list of alternative class libraries for
the blacklisted java.* classes?

I would still prefer the ImageIO classes be accessible (along with the other
blacklisted standard java.* packages...) as ImageIO allows for a speedy native
implementation of the core algorithims. And is generally more compatible with a lot
of existing software.

Only reason I can see this being blacklisted is because you want to force us to user
your imaging API which is billable (per call).

zh...@gmail.com <zh...@gmail.com> #6Apr 29, 2009 08:11AM

Sanselan need java.awt.*,but those classes are not in jre whitelist

http://incubator.apache.org/sanselan/site/sampleusage.html

ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #7Jul 22, 2009 01:29PM

Would richfaces works ?
I need an answer please

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #8Jul 25, 2009 05:21PM

I got the same error coming from Spring framework 3.0:

Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax.imageio.ImageIO is a restricted class. Please see the
Google App Engine developer's guide for more details.
at com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.shared.stub.javax.imageio.ImageIO.<clinit>(ImageIO.java)
at
org.springframework.http.converter.BufferedImageHttpMessageConverter.<init>(BufferedImageHttpMessageC
onverter.java:70)
at
org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.annotation.AnnotationMethodHandlerAdapter.<init>(AnnotationMethod
HandlerAdapter.java:166)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source)
at
com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.shared.intercept.java.lang.reflect.Constructor_.newInstance(Construc
tor_.java:60)
at org.springframework.beans.BeanUtils.instantiateClass(BeanUtils.java:127)

vg...@gmail.com <vg...@gmail.com> #9Dec 13, 2009 05:13AM

Please add rich faces support on GAE

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #10Dec 29, 2009 11:41AM

Yes... please add RichFaces support!

ak...@gmail.com <ak...@gmail.com> #11Jan 9, 2010 08:29PM

please add richfaces support

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #12Jan 14, 2010 01:48AM

[Comment deleted]

sh...@gmail.com <sh...@gmail.com> #13Jan 19, 2010 03:45PM

yes.. richfaces would be perfect on google appengine

ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #14Jan 20, 2010 09:22PM

Wonder if you could provide and adapter for ImageIO that would use the Google image
libraries.

lo...@gmail.com <lo...@gmail.com> #15Jan 30, 2010 08:21PM

Along with ImageIO, google appengine would also need to lift restrictions on
java.awt.Dimension, java.awt.Color, and some Graphics2D classes for RichFaces to work
on AppEngine. I would urge google to allow these classes so that at least some simple
functionality of RichFaces would work.

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #16Feb 7, 2010 03:13PM

Please add richfaces support. Thanks.

do...@gmail.com <do...@gmail.com> #17Feb 10, 2010 07:23PM

please add richfaces support

ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #18Feb 12, 2010 10:03PM

does anybody knows why richfaces using ImageIO?

ag...@gmail.com <ag...@gmail.com> #19Feb 25, 2010 03:54PM

Please provide richfaces support. It's very impoprtant since many people use
richfaces and would like to deploy these applications to App Engine

me...@gmail.com <me...@gmail.com> #20Mar 4, 2010 12:49AM

I want to add some valication code image in the register form of my app. If ImageIO
is not in the whitelist, how can I do this? Google App Engine is such a toy!

ca...@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> #21Mar 25, 2010 03:05AM

Please add richfaces support.
PS: Richfaces also references java.awt.Dimension, which is another restricted class.

Thanks.

za...@gmail.com <za...@gmail.com> #22Mar 27, 2010 03:49PM

Please, add RichFaces support. Thank you.

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #23Mar 28, 2010 05:54AM

Please, add RichFaces support. We can't port our devs to GAE because of that.

pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #24Apr 3, 2010 12:41AM

Please, add it!!!!! I can't use GAE without RichFaces

rk...@gmail.com <rk...@gmail.com> #25Apr 5, 2010 12:52AM

Another vote for richfaces support for GAE

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #26Apr 5, 2010 02:31PM

I vote.......
RichFaces for GAE

ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #27Apr 6, 2010 07:50PM

Please, add RichFaces support. Thank you.

dj...@gmail.com <dj...@gmail.com> #28Apr 7, 2010 05:22PM

You sure do have my vote for this issue. I've been waiting for java.awt.* classes for
a long time to be white-listed on GAE.

yc...@google.com <yc...@google.com> #29Apr 7, 2010 06:01PM

Please, do not add comments to say "Yay!, please please please support rich faces yes
yes yes". It notifies everyone following the issue (and apologies for this comment
too). Star the issue instead ! (like 98 people did so far!)
Thanks :)
Have fun !

gl...@gmail.com <gl...@gmail.com> #30Apr 16, 2010 11:44AM

Gostaria que o gae tivesse suporte a richfaces

Would you like GAE have support RichFaces

pe...@gmail.com <pe...@gmail.com> #31Apr 26, 2010 02:22PM

richfaces would be nice

hb...@gmail.com <hb...@gmail.com> #32Apr 26, 2010 04:01PM

richfaces would be nice

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #33Apr 28, 2010 09:52AM

As Google doesn't seem to find it important to support one the major JSF framework on GAE (it makes me think of
another company that forbid flash on its platform, but it's not the same since "Google doesn't do evil" and doesn't
have a technology they prefer to push instead of JSF :-) ). Richfaces start to work to support GAE on it's v4
release. If you're interested please vote on the Jira ticket here :

https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/RFPL-567

re...@gmail.com <re...@gmail.com> #34Apr 28, 2010 10:15AM

All of my content I submit to begin

rd...@gmail.com <rd...@gmail.com> #35May 20, 2010 08:27PM

I'd like to use richfaces with gae

em...@gmail.com <em...@gmail.com> #36May 31, 2010 07:54AM

Please, add RichFaces support. Thank you.

m....@gtempaccount.com <m....@gtempaccount.com> #37Jun 8, 2010 12:15PM

Please, add RichFaces support.Please.

ga...@gmail.com <ga...@gmail.com> #38Jun 17, 2010 01:22PM

Please, add RichFaces support. thx

he...@yahoo.com <he...@yahoo.com> #39Jul 20, 2010 07:08PM

I would love do have RichFaces suopported by GAE .

so...@iisigroup.com <so...@iisigroup.com> #40Jul 21, 2010 05:38AM

I love RichFaces and GAE. Please add it!

cd...@gmail.com <cd...@gmail.com> #41Sep 25, 2010 01:09PM

Please, RichFaces for GAE.

qu...@gmail.com <qu...@gmail.com> #42Sep 25, 2010 01:39PM

Please add support to richfaces

mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #43Oct 14, 2010 07:14AM

richfaces 4.0 will have GAE support
see:

http://www.slideshare.net/balunasj/rich-faces-inthecloudminibooth

as...@gmail.com <as...@gmail.com> #44Oct 21, 2010 11:00AM

hope google will add richface support soon.thanks

su...@gmail.com <su...@gmail.com> #45Oct 21, 2010 11:11AM

There are multiple reasons why somebody would like to have ImageIO in GAE.

If your reason is that you would like to run RichFaces on GAE then you can do so without ImageIO in the new RF version 4. And while the final version of RF 4 might not show up before Q1 2011 you can already do testing with the M3 release.

The RichFaces 4.0 Milestone 3 build has a Maven archetype that builds a GAE compatible version of RF.

Check out the readme here:

http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/richfaces/tags/4.0.0.20101004-M3/archetypes/rf-gae-sample/readme.txt

dj...@gmail.com <dj...@gmail.com> #46Oct 21, 2010 12:35PM

I don't use RF, but ImageIO and other awt libraries would help me a lot to make barcodes on the fly with the iText library. I have all my servlets ready and tested outside App Engine, now I just need Google allow me and everyone else who need image functionality to use awt. =)

yj...@gmail.com <yj...@gmail.com> #47Nov 11, 2010 04:06PM

Please add support for Richfaces. Thannks

je...@gtempaccount.com <je...@gtempaccount.com> #48Feb 8, 2011 01:03AM

I would like to use Apache FOP for creating PDF documents, but this is impossible due to the missing javax.imageio.ImageIO.

dj...@gmail.com <dj...@gmail.com> #49Feb 8, 2011 01:40AM

I saw a lot of movement on this request, some logs by the project members but... How is the progress of this request. It's kind of strange to not know if the google guys are working on this, or not. A little of feedback doesn't hurt, does it?

ja...@googlemail.com <ja...@googlemail.com> #50Feb 11, 2011 10:16AM

I'm also interested in PDF creation using Apache FOP.
@djdarkin...: Could you point me to the logs you mentioned?

dj...@gmail.com <dj...@gmail.com> #51Feb 11, 2011 11:10AM

@jan.morl...: Actually, forgive me, I was a little mistaken, there's just one log entrance as you can see on the Comment n# 44 of this Issue Post.

I think that means that someone on google is treating this request. Or am I terribly wrong?

se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #52Feb 20, 2011 10:36AM

Hello!

I have created amazing application with server processing of a graphic.
I want to deploy it to google app engine.
But i have got...

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax.imageio.ImageIO is a restricted class. Please see the Google App Engine developer's guide for more details.

It is very bad for all humanity!
Please, could you add javax.imageio.ImageIO to whitelist or give us workaround.

tu...@gmail.com <tu...@gmail.com> #53Mar 7, 2011 06:57AM

Please add support for RichFaces... Thank you

un...@gmail.com <un...@gmail.com> #54Mar 27, 2011 10:29AM

Please add support for RichFaces... Thank you

ni...@gmail.com <ni...@gmail.com> #55Mar 27, 2011 05:02PM

RichFaces 4 supports GAE perfectly

is...@gmail.com <is...@gmail.com> #56May 11, 2011 10:43PM

Vote for

Issue 5022

-- I believe it's more likely to happen.

di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #57May 12, 2011 10:21PM

i want to use this library too

pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com> #58Aug 27, 2011 12:49AM

Bulk edit: mark escalated issue as Accepted.

cr...@google.com <cr...@google.com> #60Nov 18, 2014 08:50PM

Status: Won't Fix (Infeasible)

Please use Java Managed VMs to gain access to classes that are not white listed.

https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/java/managed-vms/

Issue 35884083

Description

Issue summary

Comments

le...@gmail.com <le...@gmail.com> #2Apr 15, 2009 05:24AM

le...@gmail.com <le...@gmail.com> #3Apr 15, 2009 05:45AM

to...@google.com <to...@google.com> #4Apr 23, 2009 08:17PM

le...@gmail.com <le...@gmail.com> #5Apr 25, 2009 09:21AM

zh...@gmail.com <zh...@gmail.com> #6Apr 29, 2009 08:11AM

ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #7Jul 22, 2009 01:29PM

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #8Jul 25, 2009 05:21PM

vg...@gmail.com <vg...@gmail.com> #9Dec 13, 2009 05:13AM

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #10Dec 29, 2009 11:41AM

ak...@gmail.com <ak...@gmail.com> #11Jan 9, 2010 08:29PM

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #12Jan 14, 2010 01:48AM

sh...@gmail.com <sh...@gmail.com> #13Jan 19, 2010 03:45PM

ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #14Jan 20, 2010 09:22PM

lo...@gmail.com <lo...@gmail.com> #15Jan 30, 2010 08:21PM

al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #16Feb 7, 2010 03:13PM

do...@gmail.com <do...@gmail.com> #17Feb 10, 2010 07:23PM

ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #18Feb 12, 2010 10:03PM

ag...@gmail.com <ag...@gmail.com> #19Feb 25, 2010 03:54PM

me...@gmail.com <me...@gmail.com> #20Mar 4, 2010 12:49AM

ca...@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> #21Mar 25, 2010 03:05AM

za...@gmail.com <za...@gmail.com> #22Mar 27, 2010 03:49PM

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #23Mar 28, 2010 05:54AM

pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #24Apr 3, 2010 12:41AM

rk...@gmail.com <rk...@gmail.com> #25Apr 5, 2010 12:52AM

ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #26Apr 5, 2010 02:31PM

ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #27Apr 6, 2010 07:50PM

dj...@gmail.com <dj...@gmail.com> #28Apr 7, 2010 05:22PM

yc...@google.com <yc...@google.com> #29Apr 7, 2010 06:01PM

gl...@gmail.com <gl...@gmail.com> #30Apr 16, 2010 11:44AM

pe...@gmail.com <pe...@gmail.com> #31Apr 26, 2010 02:22PM

hb...@gmail.com <hb...@gmail.com> #32Apr 26, 2010 04:01PM

an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #33Apr 28, 2010 09:52AM

re...@gmail.com <re...@gmail.com> #34Apr 28, 2010 10:15AM

rd...@gmail.com <rd...@gmail.com> #35May 20, 2010 08:27PM

em...@gmail.com <em...@gmail.com> #36May 31, 2010 07:54AM

m....@gtempaccount.com <m....@gtempaccount.com> #37Jun 8, 2010 12:15PM

ga...@gmail.com <ga...@gmail.com> #38Jun 17, 2010 01:22PM

he...@yahoo.com <he...@yahoo.com> #39Jul 20, 2010 07:08PM

so...@iisigroup.com <so...@iisigroup.com> #40Jul 21, 2010 05:38AM

cd...@gmail.com <cd...@gmail.com> #41Sep 25, 2010 01:09PM

qu...@gmail.com <qu...@gmail.com> #42Sep 25, 2010 01:39PM

mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #43Oct 14, 2010 07:14AM

as...@gmail.com <as...@gmail.com> #44Oct 21, 2010 11:00AM

su...@gmail.com <su...@gmail.com> #45Oct 21, 2010 11:11AM

dj...@gmail.com <dj...@gmail.com> #46Oct 21, 2010 12:35PM

yj...@gmail.com <yj...@gmail.com> #47Nov 11, 2010 04:06PM

je...@gtempaccount.com <je...@gtempaccount.com> #48Feb 8, 2011 01:03AM

dj...@gmail.com <dj...@gmail.com> #49Feb 8, 2011 01:40AM

ja...@googlemail.com <ja...@googlemail.com> #50Feb 11, 2011 10:16AM

dj...@gmail.com <dj...@gmail.com> #51Feb 11, 2011 11:10AM

se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #52Feb 20, 2011 10:36AM

tu...@gmail.com <tu...@gmail.com> #53Mar 7, 2011 06:57AM

un...@gmail.com <un...@gmail.com> #54Mar 27, 2011 10:29AM

ni...@gmail.com <ni...@gmail.com> #55Mar 27, 2011 05:02PM

is...@gmail.com <is...@gmail.com> #56May 11, 2011 10:43PM

di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #57May 12, 2011 10:21PM

pr...@google.com <pr...@google.com> #58Aug 27, 2011 12:49AM

cr...@google.com <cr...@google.com> #60Nov 18, 2014 08:50PM

Add comment

Issue metadata