Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OAuth 2.0 final standard #56

Closed
wonderfly opened this issue Jan 9, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

OAuth 2.0 final standard #56

wonderfly opened this issue Jan 9, 2015 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor

From yan...@google.com on October 19, 2012 15:34:48

External references, such as a standards document, or specification? http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749 (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework) http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6750 (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: Bearer Token Usage Java environments (e.g. Java 6, Android 2.3, App Engine, or All)? Java and App Engine. Please describe the feature requested. Now that it is a final standard, we should make a pass at the OAuth 2.0 implementation and see if anything has changed since draft 23. At the least, we should update the JavaDoc to point to the latest spec URL.

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/google-oauth-java-client/issues/detail?id=56

@wonderfly wonderfly added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. imported labels Jan 9, 2015
@wonderfly wonderfly self-assigned this Jan 9, 2015
@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on December 01, 2012 09:31:43

Labels: -Milestone-Version1.13.0 Milestone-Version1.14.0

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on January 10, 2013 14:34:44

https://codereview.appspot.com/7060072

Status: Started

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on January 17, 2013 19:13:15

Status: Fixed

@wonderfly
Copy link
Contributor Author

From yan...@google.com on February 09, 2013 05:21:55

Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant