New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spec clarification on named vs. unnamed types #5682
Labels
Comments
It's not hard to understand, it's just that there are a number of things it could mean in the grand scheme of things a person could call a named type. "Of course float64 isn't a named type, did you give it a name?" or "Of course []float64 has a name, it's a slice of floats". Even making the statement "a named type is a type with a name" is better than what's currently there as it defines a named type as a type which has a name rather than a type which was given a name |
https://golang.org/cl/11055043 Owner changed to @griesemer. Status changed to Accepted. |
This issue was closed by revision 8268ead. Status changed to Fixed. |
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: