Obsolete
Status Update
Comments
ju...@gmail.com <ju...@gmail.com> #2
Actually, a multiplier of 8.67 gets me back to the approximate position it should be.
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #3
This bug was fixed in 2.1.1. Thanks for the report!
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #4
While the behavior has changed, it is still incorrect, IIUC. Now the view is shifted up too much for the values entered. For instance, when I enter a bottom inset of 200, which is less than half of the total height (509) of the map, and so should have no effect on the default centering behavior, the marker is actually centered at 354.5 points from the bottom, which is the center of the map plus half of the bottom inset. This seems incorrect per my understanding of that API.
ac...@gmail.com <ac...@gmail.com> #5
354.5 sounds exactly right to me.
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #6
Same.
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #8
Same here...please address the issue.
Xi...@sunnet.us <Xi...@sunnet.us> #9
Same.
en...@google.com <en...@google.com> #10
Thanks for reporting it. We've filed it internally and will prioritize accordingly.
ba...@gmail.com <ba...@gmail.com> #12
My clients site uses a plugin that relies on KML placemarks. This site no longer works and I cannot fix it!
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #13
Color seems to work with Google Hosted icons
<IconStyle>
<color>FF80ffff</color>
<Icon>
<href>http://maps.google.com/mapfiles/kml/pal2/icon18.png </href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
<IconStyle>
<color>FF80ffff</color>
<Icon>
<href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
st...@gmail.com <st...@gmail.com> #14
My problem too
ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #15
Please fix this issue ASAP! My client is depending on this functionality for their public school system!! :-)
fa...@gmail.com <fa...@gmail.com> #16
I can't see any progress from September on this bug. Any news?
g....@gmail.com <g....@gmail.com> #17
Please can you let us know the status. In few months the old Google API will no longer be working anymore and we need to export the DATA.
thanks
thanks
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #18
It has been quite a while since the issue was brought up. What are the plans? This needs to be addressed ASAP!!
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #19
We are finally noticing some progress on this issue... it appears that the IconStyle information is back, including the color, but the associated icon is ALWAYS white. We're so close here... please take the next step and resolve fully by having the icon URL reflect an icon of the correct color, as was the behavior previously.
<IconStyle>
<color>ff44AF62</color>
<scale>1.1</scale>
<Icon>
<href>http://www.gstatic.com/mapspro/images/stock/959-wht-circle-blank.png </href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
example:
http://www.garfieldbrooklyn.com/listing/60-plaza-street-east/
<IconStyle>
<color>ff44AF62</color>
<scale>1.1</scale>
<Icon>
<href>
</Icon>
</IconStyle>
example:
ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #20
This article and many other on your blog are very interesting.
I'm very interested in learning more about your site.
Do you have a fanspage on facebook or other.?
Regards:
http://www.indopinbb.com/
I'm very interested in learning more about your site.
Do you have a fanspage on facebook or other.?
Regards:
ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #21
[Comment deleted]
go...@yellowcherry.uk <go...@yellowcherry.uk> #22
Is there any progress here?
en...@google.com <en...@google.com>
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #23
We noticed that the color URL was coming through correctly for a short while but that behavior has reverted back and the icons are again always white.
Is there any update on this issue?
Is there any update on this issue?
sr...@gmail.com <sr...@gmail.com> #24
Any update on this bug, we are stuck with this issue?
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #25
Anyone figure out a work around?
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #26
[Comment deleted]
ya...@gmail.com <ya...@gmail.com> #27
So there is no way to make <color> work in <iconStyle>??
Thank you,
Yanick
Thank you,
Yanick
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #28
Hello do you have any update on this bug?
di...@gmail.com <di...@gmail.com> #29
AIS
wo...@google.com <wo...@google.com>
lu...@gmail.com <lu...@gmail.com> #30
Is there any way to make <color> work in <iconStyle>?
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #31
For anyone still waiting on a solution for this we've found that the color icons will work if you use KMZ (they are now included in a folder in the compressed KMZ archive) and either create a new map, or if you're using a new map change all the icons to the new set that Google has added. When you go to change icons, there should be a link on the lower right of the pop-up to switch to the newer icons. This worked for us and just wanted to share here in case it is of help to others.
Description
1. Create a KML with a Point and apply an IconStyle with a color-value different to ffFFFFFF
2. use the KML to create a KmlLayer
According to the documentation in KmlLayers color isn't supported at all for IconStyle and should be ignored(and therefore shouldn't affect the Layer in any manner).
Of course it would be possible to simply remove the color, but when you use KML exported from other applications this is not always an option.
Especially I mean My Maps, where it's not possible to use Symbols(except white symbols) when you want to use the exported KML in a KmlLayer
Demo:
related SO-question:
*********************************************************
For developers viewing this issue: please click the 'star' icon to be
notified of future changes, and to let us know how many of you are
interested in seeing it resolved.
*********************************************************