Fixed
Status Update
Comments
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #2
We have passed this defect on to the development team and will update this issue with more information as it becomes available.
ma...@frankschulz.com <ma...@frankschulz.com> #3
Released in 25.1.0 of the Support Library.
de...@gmail.com <de...@gmail.com> #4
Thanks but we have to call setTypeface for every view!
It should be added to this method too -> setEditText();
Same as mCollapsingTextHelper:
mCollapsingTextHelper.setTypefaces(mEditText.getTypeface());
It should be added to this method too -> setEditText();
Same as mCollapsingTextHelper:
mCollapsingTextHelper.setTypefaces(mEditText.getTypeface());
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #5
#4: Working as intended. We want the error message to use the system font unless explicitly changed.
bo...@gmail.com <bo...@gmail.com> #6
[Comment deleted]
bo...@entelligentsia.in <bo...@entelligentsia.in> #7
[Comment deleted]
bo...@entelligentsia.in <bo...@entelligentsia.in> #8
Thanks for creating this issue. We noticed this at http://walkinto.in a few days back when all of a sudden the tours started looking like crap. Further investigation quickly revealed that webgl was the culprit. We have downgraded the tours to HTML5. While the experience is better (than a broken tour) it is no where as elegant as it was with webgl support. It will be great if Google Engineering can give an update.
http://walkinto.in/demo
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #9
In email contact with the Google team it went from "the google maps API never supported WebGL" to "WebGL is not always implemented correctly so some browser/OS combinations don't get WebGL for a good reason" to "I'll check if this problem is reported by others, but I haven't heard of any widespread issues".
So added are some screenshots of different browsers on different OS's running on different hardware, showing the same simple streetview implementation (see added code.txt). All browsers are showing the example either in html4 mode (distorted, curved and simply ugly and unusable for developers) or html5 mode (looking better, but just slow and sluggish and only fairly okay on chrome). And jsut to be sure, yes all different setups used to show the streetview perfectly in version 3.16 in WebGl mode..
Please place your comments and possible screenshots of different setups to tell the developers that this is indeed a widespread issue and that something needs to be done about it because for developers using the API in their products (especially when paying a lot of money for the Google Work license), streetview is now unusable..
So added are some screenshots of different browsers on different OS's running on different hardware, showing the same simple streetview implementation (see added code.txt). All browsers are showing the example either in html4 mode (distorted, curved and simply ugly and unusable for developers) or html5 mode (looking better, but just slow and sluggish and only fairly okay on chrome). And jsut to be sure, yes all different setups used to show the streetview perfectly in version 3.16 in WebGl mode..
Please place your comments and possible screenshots of different setups to tell the developers that this is indeed a widespread issue and that something needs to be done about it because for developers using the API in their products (especially when paying a lot of money for the Google Work license), streetview is now unusable..
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #10
[Comment deleted]
lo...@gmail.com <lo...@gmail.com> #11
[Comment deleted]
ho...@gmail.com <ho...@gmail.com> #12
So, it seems like it's still possible (for some) to use the webgl rendering: https://live.tourdash.com/embed/be10cae9fd824c00a769ecdb59f0fc59 - Can you please make it available for the rest of us again? Otherwise there is no need for a program like Google Maps Business View, as embedding the tour on the homepage is the major selling point.
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #13
Checking the javascript sources, it shows they are able to load the old v3.16 of the API (last version without having problems), but this is something recent because at first they where having the same issues and distortions in their tour as everyone.
@Google Team: can you make the 3.16 version of the API accessible to everyone again until the problem is hopefully fixed in newer versions?
@Google Team: can you make the 3.16 version of the API accessible to everyone again until the problem is hopefully fixed in newer versions?
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #14
Still no spherical projection on mobile browsers.
mr...@gmail.com <mr...@gmail.com> #15
Their using a extra parameter in Gmaps Api url : &client=free-tour-dash
It's seems you can use that if your are an API reseller...
It's seems you can use that if your are an API reseller...
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #16
I checked their code a couple days ago and they where then getting back the 3.17 version with a request already containing the client id and a version request for 3.16, so it seems this is just recently made possible for them.
re...@gmail.com <re...@gmail.com> #17
Looks like this update was made for TourDash to eliminate their competition...
el...@gmail.com <el...@gmail.com> #18
So, we have now a reduce group of people that can use some of the API features. Really disgusting. Please, make all the API features accessible to everyone again.
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #19
Is there anyone with a business license who can verify if the option of using v3.16 is there for everyone with a license, or just specific cases?
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #21
Yeah, it doesn't work by default, but maybe there is an option you can set when having a business license. Just trying to look at it from all angles..
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #22
That may be the client Oauth code they created in the API Console for their project.
You can create one here:https://console.developers.google.com/project
You can create one here:
bo...@entelligentsia.in <bo...@entelligentsia.in> #23
Cross posting from a related thread on the Maps Api G+ Page : This is from Google Maps Team
Ken Hoetmer11:44 AM+1
0
1
1
Reply
Hi all, Ken from the Google Maps API team here. Apologies for the silence on this one.
Being completely open on what happened: unrelated to the embedded Street View launch (they're different code bases), the unsupported webgl mode in the JavaScript Maps API's Street View Service was removed from the frozen version during the version rollover on November 17. It had already been removed from the most heavily used versions of the API for months, so we didn't expect an outcry!
However, clearly people are very passionate about this feature, so we've decided to reintroduce webgl mode. It will again be available in the experimental release starting tomorrow. Note that this feature is still unsupported and we will very likely remove the parameter in favor of automated mode selection in the future (which will include webgl on supported browsers).
Ken Hoetmer11:44 AM+1
0
1
1
Reply
Hi all, Ken from the Google Maps API team here. Apologies for the silence on this one.
Being completely open on what happened: unrelated to the embedded Street View launch (they're different code bases), the unsupported webgl mode in the JavaScript Maps API's Street View Service was removed from the frozen version during the version rollover on November 17. It had already been removed from the most heavily used versions of the API for months, so we didn't expect an outcry!
However, clearly people are very passionate about this feature, so we've decided to reintroduce webgl mode. It will again be available in the experimental release starting tomorrow. Note that this feature is still unsupported and we will very likely remove the parameter in favor of automated mode selection in the future (which will include webgl on supported browsers).
ho...@gmail.com <ho...@gmail.com> #24
Hi all,
Ken from the Google Maps API team here. We are listening... just working out what to do.
The webgl parameter will be introduced back into the experimental version of the API starting tomorrow. And we've already gotten TourDash up and running quickly by giving them access to a crazy-old version of the API.
Note that the webgl parameter is still very much unsupported and we will very likely remove the parameter in favor of automated mode selection in the future (which will include webgl on supported browsers).
Ken from the Google Maps API team here. We are listening... just working out what to do.
The webgl parameter will be introduced back into the experimental version of the API starting tomorrow. And we've already gotten TourDash up and running quickly by giving them access to a crazy-old version of the API.
Note that the webgl parameter is still very much unsupported and we will very likely remove the parameter in favor of automated mode selection in the future (which will include webgl on supported browsers).
el...@gmail.com <el...@gmail.com> #25
Well, next time you are planning to bring a "quick" solution, please think in the majority and not in the minority. This issue was reported more than a week ago without an official answer until now. TourDash didn't complain at all - at least not using the public channels, and they are already enjoying the solution to our problem.
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #26
Ken, that's good news. Just a question to make sure we don't end up in the precise same situation a couple months from now:
- I don't at all mind the 'mode' option being removed, but will the automated selection for WebGL actually work when you do, because at the moment no combination of browser/OS shows the streetview with WebGL?
- I don't at all mind the 'mode' option being removed, but will the automated selection for WebGL actually work when you do, because at the moment no combination of browser/OS shows the streetview with WebGL?
de...@gmail.com <de...@gmail.com> #27
[Comment deleted]
bo...@entelligentsia.in <bo...@entelligentsia.in> #28
Finally it is re-enabled on the experimental version. Don't know what happens when .exp cuts into a numbered version (3.18)
el...@gmail.com <el...@gmail.com> #29
It's finally re-enabled. When that happen, we need to start complaining one more time.
ma...@google.com <ma...@google.com> #30
Closing this now that we have a solution in place.
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #31
Yeah! Nice respond and fix. Really appreciate it.
Description
demonstration page if at all possible, or attach code.
1.
*********************************************************
For developers viewing this issue: please click the 'star' icon to be
notified of future changes, and to let us know how many of you are
interested in seeing it resolved.
*********************************************************