My favorites | Sign in
Project Home Downloads Wiki Issues Source
New issue   Search
for
  Advanced search   Search tips   Subscriptions
Issue 162: Need better change description for Gerrit merge/commits
  Back to list
Status:  Released
Owner:  ----
Closed:  Oct 2012
Cc:  edh...@google.com


Sign in to add a comment
 
Reported by code-rev...@gtempaccount.com, Sep 24, 2009
Reported by Ed Heyl <edheyl@google.com> on Mon May 04 11:26:06 PDT 2009
Source: JIRA GERRIT-162
Affected Version: 2.0.10
Environment: n/a

When Gerrit needs to merge a reviewed change, the resulting commit/merge uses
--log, which doesn't have enough information:

It would be nice if Gerrit did the same thing that the automerger and
autoimporter does:
1) keep the author (but committer would still be gerrit)
2) the subject should contain a short indication that it's gerrit, the
original short sha1, and the original submit (truncated if necessary)
Sep 24, 2009
#1 sop+code@google.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Owner: ---
Labels: -Priority-Major Priority-Minor
Sep 24, 2009
#2 sop+code@google.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Cc: edh...@google.com
Dec 29, 2009
#3 sop@google.com
Changes I6fd61e6b9a428dba61aa6b3ec28f936fc7e404f6 and
I4428f5924844d6ae7b219a0643f5e93cf01e678e try to improve
on the commit message as best as I'm willing to do right
now.  A merge isn't a cherry-pick, it shouldn't look like
one in the log.
Status: Fixed
Labels: FixedIn-2.1.1
Oct 25, 2012
#4 sop@google.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Status: Released
Sign in to add a comment

Powered by Google Project Hosting