| Issue 63: | Modification required in PPT | |
| 1 person starred this issue and may be notified of changes. | Back to list |
Hello everyone, This mail is to discuss the cause of being judges 4th at IITK, this will help us in improving further our PPT and other such stoofs. From My side: -> The project is not completly innovative -> The Online thing is innovative in our project -> Even the open file is relocated is the major high light of the project -> In the PPT we need to Highlight the above two points -> rather that explaining "What HSM is ?" for 3 mins we should just define it in simple words -> After that we can begin "What OHSM offers " highlighting the +ves of OHSM and -ves of other systems. -> A dedicated slide for Tricky copy algo should be there but will be shown to selected people -> We need to highlight that "we have reduced all the limitations present in this field" -> coloured chart (flex printing) -> Improving co ordination among team members Kindly add to it
Feb 19, 2009
Project Member
#1
imreckless@gmail.com
Status:
In-progress
Feb 19, 2009
The jumping in between was not seen but when a question was asked ......... So according to RKS major changes are in the 2nd and 3rd slides We need to work on the starting of the PPT Any system level project will appear boring to Application judges .... so the atten has to be drawn from the begining
Feb 19, 2009
That's what my motto is , explain everything in short about OHSM and jump quickly to design and working.
Feb 19, 2009
yes .... let SKS reach the head quarters and we will do that
Feb 21, 2009
Judges should be given a site of what they want from our project. Whether they want a design or he is unknown of HSM itself (The mozilla wala person). Every person has different sites and different direction of thinking. First point out what the person is interested in and then proceed further with his interest. Its on time decision. Sitting here and predicting the flow is useless. We have to be prepared for every thing. Tell them the +ve points and if they get any of the -ve points then only the things should be explained.Till then we are best (and off course we are). Just have to show that this one is best and incomparable. What happened was we told them we will do this we will do that and this is not there that is not there instead we should tell what is there and how is it useful and it can be enhanced more. Every thing is fair in love and war ;) Questions of judges should be answered properly. Questions asked were different and the answers given were different this should not happen(the very first judge, response to him from our side was ridiculous). Better take half a minute think and then answer instead of wrong answering.
Feb 27, 2009
Let us start with this work
Mar 7, 2009
PPT has to be changed to fit into the time limit of 10 mins. It is the requirement of IIT Roorkee. Deadline is 8th March
Mar 14, 2009
The PPT is finalized and sent to Roorkee. We will be using the PPT of Roorkee henceforth
Apr 24, 2009
The PPT is finalized and can be found on the downloads section. Stay tuned
Status:
Done
|