Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show function type in hover text #11073

Closed
stevemessick opened this issue Jun 4, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed

Show function type in hover text #11073

stevemessick opened this issue Jun 4, 2013 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Milestone

Comments

@stevemessick
Copy link
Contributor

Feature request: if I hover over a typedef for a function type, show me the function type.

karlklose@google.com
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Editor: 0.1.2_r23578 (2013-06-04)
OS: Linux - amd64 (3.2.5-gg1130)
JVM: 1.7.0-google-v5

projects: 1

open dart files: 52

auto-run pub: true
localhost resolves to: 127.0.0.1
mem max/total/free: 940 / 940 / 280 MB
thread count: 44
index: 316820 relationships in 62630 keys in 255 sources

SDK installed: true
Dartium installed: true
analysis engine: new

@clayberg
Copy link

clayberg commented Jun 4, 2013

Removed Priority-Unassigned label.
Added Priority-Medium label.

@clayberg
Copy link

clayberg commented Jun 4, 2013

Removed Type-Defect label.
Added Type-Enhancement label.

@danrubel
Copy link

Set owner to @scheglov.
Removed this from the Later milestone.
Added this to the 1.1 milestone.

@scheglov
Copy link
Contributor

@scheglov
Copy link
Contributor

@stevemessick stevemessick added this to the 1.1 milestone Nov 26, 2013
@kevmoo kevmoo added type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug and removed type-enhancement labels Mar 1, 2016
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants