WAI
Status Update
Comments
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #2
have you actually hit this limit in practice?
mg...@gerbasio.com <mg...@gerbasio.com> #3
I've hit this limit and that made me question the choice of !28 in this bug report.
The scenario is the following:
- we're deploying unit and functional tests over SSH to non rooted Android devices
- beside executables we're deploying big assets (several GB) over SSH wtih rsync
- we're using SSHDroid which home is /data/data/berserker.android.apps.sshdroid/home
/data/data/berserker.android.apps.sshdroid/home is already 48 characters which is more than a third of the maximum allowed name if you pass an absolute path to dlopen()
Gregory
The scenario is the following:
- we're deploying unit and functional tests over SSH to non rooted Android devices
- beside executables we're deploying big assets (several GB) over SSH wtih rsync
- we're using SSHDroid which home is /data/data/berserker.android.apps.sshdroid/home
/data/data/berserker.android.apps.sshdroid/home is already 48 characters which is more than a third of the maximum allowed name if you pass an absolute path to dlopen()
Gregory
ed...@gmail.com <ed...@gmail.com> #5
As a user I want to be able to see these stats too. I there is not a really good reason, this function should be restored.
lt...@gmail.com <lt...@gmail.com> #6
As a user I want to be able to see these stats too.
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #7
As a user, I would also like to see this.
ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #8
[Comment deleted]
ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #9
Apps to get better stats saved my batterie multiple times.
This need to be fixed
This need to be fixed
ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #10
Starting from KitKat users are not able to easily detect "No-Sleep" bugs which is very well known Battery Drain cause.
This change must be reverted
This change must be reverted
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #11
Ich möchte als Anwender den Batteryverbrauch ermitteln können.Ich möchte diese Statistiken sehen.
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #12
I'm curious about what the motivation for this change was. Are we missing some security issue?
me...@gmail.com <me...@gmail.com> #13
thanks so much but i think battery not save
d....@gmail.com <d....@gmail.com> #14
I vote for this!
ml...@gmail.com <ml...@gmail.com> #15
I would like battery stats back as well.
ef...@gmail.com <ef...@gmail.com> #16
Battery stats is beneficial for many users, it should be reverted to its previous state.
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #17
I would like them back too
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #18
I vote for this.
pi...@gmail.com <pi...@gmail.com> #19
i vote for this too. without apps like this, devs would not know if their apps have bugs that drain battery. without that knowlege, issues will not be identified and fixed. users would get frustrated and would eventually swich to the other side. you wouldn't want that, right??
fr...@gmail.com <fr...@gmail.com> #20
[Comment deleted]
fr...@gmail.com <fr...@gmail.com> #21
I vote for this
de...@gmail.com <de...@gmail.com> #22
I vote
for this.
for this.
mu...@gmail.com <mu...@gmail.com> #23
I also vote for restoring that permission, as there are lots of users who were benefiting from third party apps that detect abusive uses of battery and wakelock.
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #24
Battery status permission is one of the distinguish feature from iOS.. i would like get this permission forever.. strictly vote this issue...
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #25
The one above me somewhere about iOS, and the one about third party apps,
that is the main reason why I want this permission moved back to the user
category.
that is the main reason why I want this permission moved back to the user
category.
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #26
I vote for this!
ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #27
"According to a study made by P. Vekris: “55% of 328 applications using wakelocks do not follow our policies for no-sleep bugs” [2012]. Some major applications have been released with No-Sleep bugs."
ref :http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/wakelocks-detect-no-sleep-issues-in-android-applications
How Android developers and users have to deal with this issue in KitKat??
ref :
How Android developers and users have to deal with this issue in KitKat??
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #28
Please fix. Also please don't remove the gallery app. I don't want the dang Google Plus thing.
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #29
Be careful Google. 4.4 is looking more and more like you're going to piss a lot of people off.
ad...@gmail.com <ad...@gmail.com> #30
I vote for this too, it is useful to see what is draining the battery in the case of aosp roms.
d3...@gmail.com <d3...@gmail.com> #31
Another unacceptable and unneeded change within Android. Please revert as suggested by the op.
I don't like the direction where android is going. Closed source changes, never a good thing.
I don't like the direction where android is going. Closed source changes, never a good thing.
le...@gmail.com <le...@gmail.com> #32
I vote this too. How can I use some of the battery status apps that I like?
se...@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> #33
I vote for this too
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #34
Have my vote!
k....@gmail.com <k....@gmail.com> #35
[Comment deleted]
k....@gmail.com <k....@gmail.com> #36
I'd like to see Wakelock Detector at the android 4.4 very much!
el...@gmail.com <el...@gmail.com> #37
I absolutely vote for this!!!
co...@gmail.com <co...@gmail.com> #38
Folks, please STAR the issue in the upper left hand corner of the page instead of constantly adding a vote comment. Vote comments serve not but to annoy the crap out of everyone who has starred it.
vl...@gmail.com <vl...@gmail.com> #39
i vote for this !!
ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #40
I vote for this
gr...@gmail.com <gr...@gmail.com> #41
Not cool Goog.give it back.
jl...@gmail.com <jl...@gmail.com> #42
[Comment deleted]
ed...@gmail.com <ed...@gmail.com> #43
I vote for Ruud. I need this app
in...@gmail.com <in...@gmail.com> #44
I vote for this
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #45
Please allow battery stat permissions. Very useful for monitoring!
jl...@gmail.com <jl...@gmail.com> #46
Posting a comment that "you vote for this" does +nothing+. Make sure you highlight the star near the top off this page. That gets counted as a vote for this issue.
I agree with all of the above. That someone could make this change with little or no consideration as to the negative effects of such a change is frustrating and a bit scary. Is there no oversight of changes like this? You don't change APIs without major justification.
In trying to deal with putting the backup control mechanism in the wrong place, they "fixed" the problem, but caused a much bigger problem.
They should have removed the backup controls from the battery info/status api and created a separate api for that function. They took a shortcut and we're now seeing the downside of taking shortcuts.
Reverse this change.
I agree with all of the above. That someone could make this change with little or no consideration as to the negative effects of such a change is frustrating and a bit scary. Is there no oversight of changes like this? You don't change APIs without major justification.
In trying to deal with putting the backup control mechanism in the wrong place, they "fixed" the problem, but caused a much bigger problem.
They should have removed the backup controls from the battery info/status api and created a separate api for that function. They took a shortcut and we're now seeing the downside of taking shortcuts.
Reverse this change.
be...@gmail.com <be...@gmail.com> #47
Really need this back. Used an app for my Nexus 7 and found a couple of games were the culprit. Having issues again with something and now I have no way to find out. Frustrating as my partner was going to get a Nexus 7 but not until we can identify why my battery is terrible.
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #48
As a user, I would also like to see this.
to...@gmail.com <to...@gmail.com> #49
Please reintroduce as required for wake lock analysis .
we...@gmail.com <we...@gmail.com> #50
Please undo
me...@gmail.com <me...@gmail.com> #51
[Comment deleted]
m....@gmail.com <m....@gmail.com> #52
[Comment deleted]
m....@gmail.com <m....@gmail.com> #53
I vote for this!!
to...@gmail.com <to...@gmail.com> #54
Please undo this change asap! It makes no sense to me!
aa...@gmail.com <aa...@gmail.com> #55
for the last time people, click the star at the top left of this page, typing "I vote for this" does nothing and you are annoying the people like me waiting for a useful response from Google or a workaround from the more capable dev community.
xd...@googlemail.com <xd...@googlemail.com> #56
Please undo this
ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #57
I voted that I want my battery stats back. I use GSAM app everyday to know what's going on with my apps.
I find we are entering Apple territory, that is, Big brother knows best and can control whatever he wants.
I find we are entering Apple territory, that is, Big brother knows best and can control whatever he wants.
ty...@gmail.com <ty...@gmail.com> #58
I vote for this.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #59
Vote
m4...@googlemail.com <m4...@googlemail.com> #60
Vote
zo...@gmail.com <zo...@gmail.com> #61
Vote
ya...@gmail.com <ya...@gmail.com> #62
Vote !
ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #63
I vote for this
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #64
Bad decision. Please restore this functionality so that apps like Wakelock Detector can work again. It helped me understand why my phone's battery occasionally drained after wireless charging.
ap...@gmail.com <ap...@gmail.com> #65
Vote!
Undo this change or explain.
Undo this change or explain.
sh...@gmail.com <sh...@gmail.com> #66
PLEASE DO NOT COMMENT if you have nothing constructive to say (technical information, information on why Google changed this, etc). DO NOT just say "I vote!!"
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #67
As comment number 36 said;
Folks, please STAR the issue in the upper left hand corner of the page
instead of constantly adding a vote comment. Vote comments serve not but to
annoy the crap out of everyone who has starred it.
Folks, please STAR the issue in the upper left hand corner of the page
instead of constantly adding a vote comment. Vote comments serve not but to
annoy the crap out of everyone who has starred it.
sa...@gmail.com <sa...@gmail.com> #68
I also vote for this.
ir...@gmail.com <ir...@gmail.com> #69
Я за отмену этого изменения!
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #70
Fixxx
ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #71
Star marked. I vote too
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #72
I vote for it
ko...@ukr.net <ko...@ukr.net> #73
Я за отмену этого изменения!
cz...@gmail.com <cz...@gmail.com> #74
Vote!
cs...@googlemail.com <cs...@googlemail.com> #75
Bad time for that move, for me the KitKat update came in just after the trouble with Google Play Services keeping lots of devices awake and sucking their batteries empty. Starred.
cc...@gmail.com <cc...@gmail.com> #76
I vote for this!
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #77
Please undo this
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #78
I vote for this!
mj...@gmail.com <mj...@gmail.com> #79
I *ed the issue but would like to explain WHY this tool is useful from a user perspective.
After updating to 4.4 on my Nexus 4 I've noticed that my phone will go from a full charge to almost dead or fully dead /overnight/ (depending on how much I sleep in). The class of applications that use this feature are the only tool I have for determining where the fault for this change in behavior lies and thus how to begin fixing the issue.
After updating to 4.4 on my Nexus 4 I've noticed that my phone will go from a full charge to almost dead or fully dead /overnight/ (depending on how much I sleep in). The class of applications that use this feature are the only tool I have for determining where the fault for this change in behavior lies and thus how to begin fixing the issue.
bi...@gmail.com <bi...@gmail.com> #80
For those of you who have issues with overnight drain, put your phone on airplane mode and consider force stopping offending apps. I did that last night: when I went to sleep it was 88%, when I woke up it was 88%. Same story for most of the other times I did that. Regardless, I would definitely like to see this issue fixed; this is an important permission that shouldn't have been revoked in the first place. That said, I'm sure Google is on it.
dj...@gmail.com <dj...@gmail.com> #81
Voted
pr...@gmail.com <pr...@gmail.com> #82
Vote
ru...@gmail.com <ru...@gmail.com> #83
Google, please make KitKat more user-friendly.
ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #84
Something is keeping my phone awake and killing my battery. I used to be able to diagnose such issues, but not any more. Thanks Google!
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #85
Voted for this. I seriously need to use applications which cause no-sleep problems.
bh...@gmail.com <bh...@gmail.com> #86
I vote for this too!
sv...@held-fischer.de <sv...@held-fischer.de> #87
Please undo this
pb...@gmail.com <pb...@gmail.com> #88
This is an important issue that needs to be resolved.
pu...@gmail.com <pu...@gmail.com> #89
One can suppose this permission was removed to prevent battery monitoring apps to blame other apps (including Google apps) for (supposedly) bad behaviour.
aa...@gmail.com <aa...@gmail.com> #90
[Comment deleted]
na...@gmail.com <na...@gmail.com> #91
Starred issue, would definitely like this reverted please.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #92
Bitte wieder Rückgängig machen
av...@gmail.com <av...@gmail.com> #93
Vote
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #94
I vote for this... This service is critical for general troubleshooting
zm...@gmail.com <zm...@gmail.com> #95
I vote to revert this code so that BBS+ works again.
What's wrong, Google? Afraid that msm_hsic_wakelock issue (which has never been solved and eats my phone's battery in a day) was getting too much attention?
What's wrong, Google? Afraid that msm_hsic_wakelock issue (which has never been solved and eats my phone's battery in a day) was getting too much attention?
il...@gmail.com <il...@gmail.com> #96
I vote for this
to...@gmail.com <to...@gmail.com> #97
STOP WRITING "I VOTE FOR THIS"! Simply click on the star!
As to the issue, I think that what happened is really a shame.
First of all, I sort of agree with the user that said that this could be a way to hide battery drain problems caused by Google services under the carpet. These problems must be solved, and if Google thinks that an "out of sight, out of mind" approach is an acceptable solution, well, this is a real problem.
Also, giving users the possibility to understand what causes a battery drain in their phones is important, that's why the choice of restricting the battery stat service is definitely an unfortunate choice. One of the reasons why Android gained traction over iOS is its flexibility. Now Google is going in the wrong direction.
Another big problem is the way Google is handling Android OS updates. I see two major problems:
1) there is no early access to newer versions of Android OS (betas) prior to official release
2) too often there are changes that break existing applications, and too often those changes are not documented and not disclosed to developers in advance.
Consider what Microsoft does with Windows... of course it's impossible to guarantee backwards compatibility to every applications for every new version of Windows. But new versions are released to developers many months before their actual release date, so developers (and common users) can test their applications with the new version.
So Google should really change the way they handle Android OS updates, otherwise its developers will get annoyed and switch to WP development as soon as it reaches a decent market share (which will happen).
As to the issue, I think that what happened is really a shame.
First of all, I sort of agree with the user that said that this could be a way to hide battery drain problems caused by Google services under the carpet. These problems must be solved, and if Google thinks that an "out of sight, out of mind" approach is an acceptable solution, well, this is a real problem.
Also, giving users the possibility to understand what causes a battery drain in their phones is important, that's why the choice of restricting the battery stat service is definitely an unfortunate choice. One of the reasons why Android gained traction over iOS is its flexibility. Now Google is going in the wrong direction.
Another big problem is the way Google is handling Android OS updates. I see two major problems:
1) there is no early access to newer versions of Android OS (betas) prior to official release
2) too often there are changes that break existing applications, and too often those changes are not documented and not disclosed to developers in advance.
Consider what Microsoft does with Windows... of course it's impossible to guarantee backwards compatibility to every applications for every new version of Windows. But new versions are released to developers many months before their actual release date, so developers (and common users) can test their applications with the new version.
So Google should really change the way they handle Android OS updates, otherwise its developers will get annoyed and switch to WP development as soon as it reaches a decent market share (which will happen).
kn...@gmail.com <kn...@gmail.com> #98
This is the second time I've seen a comment like this:
"2) too often there are changes that break existing applications, and too often those changes are not documented and not disclosed to developers in advance."
I am very much in favor of restoring this functionality but everyone here needs to keep in mind that this was a private undocumented API. Apple and Microsoft aren't going to notify developers about changes to internal APIs anymore than Google has in this case and nor should they.
"2) too often there are changes that break existing applications, and too often those changes are not documented and not disclosed to developers in advance."
I am very much in favor of restoring this functionality but everyone here needs to keep in mind that this was a private undocumented API. Apple and Microsoft aren't going to notify developers about changes to internal APIs anymore than Google has in this case and nor should they.
fr...@gmail.com <fr...@gmail.com> #99
I want it back !!!
sa...@googlemail.com <sa...@googlemail.com> #100
I would like this back please.
bi...@gmail.com <bi...@gmail.com> #101
I vote for this!
ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #102
I agree - upgrade policy is disgraceful.. features should be added not removed or broken.
sorry, but this move (and such) will drive end users away after developers start giving up..
sorry, but this move (and such) will drive end users away after developers start giving up..
ga...@gmail.com <ga...@gmail.com> #103
[Comment deleted]
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #104
#11
"I'm curious about what the motivation for this change was. Are we missing some security issue?"
I'm also curious. Could the batterystats/batteryinfo make the device vulnerable to side channel attacks?
"I'm curious about what the motivation for this change was. Are we missing some security issue?"
I'm also curious. Could the batterystats/batteryinfo make the device vulnerable to side channel attacks?
ar...@gmail.com <ar...@gmail.com> #105
Voted.
Why would functionality like this be removed intentionally?
Why would functionality like this be removed intentionally?
au...@gmail.com <au...@gmail.com> #106
Maybe they have reason to do this, but seems we really need to hear a proper explanation.
ml...@gmail.com <ml...@gmail.com> #107
I vote for this as well and would be very interested to know why it was changed in the first place!
ri...@squishypuppy.com <ri...@squishypuppy.com> #108
Please undo this change.
va...@gmail.com <va...@gmail.com> #109
Google, please undo this change. As an user I found very helpful the detailed level of info provided by apps like BetterBatteryStats in order to diagnose which apps or services are draining the battery and in which cases.
pa...@gmail.com <pa...@gmail.com> #110
How can an os update ever be allowed to break apps that adheres to api's? Please ensure compatibility and proper regression testing before you roll out updates Google. This change is breaking one of my favorite apps. If battery stats truly breaks security why not offer an alternate interface/service to devs so that existing apps continue to work with a bit of porting work?
tw...@yahoo.com <tw...@yahoo.com> #111
Agree with the above. The standard usage readout does not show all apps and doesn't provide enough drill down, especially when it comes to wakelocks, to be useful. The manner inwhich this has been introduced has also been ddisconcertingly opaque.
fa...@gmail.com <fa...@gmail.com> #112
Voto para esta modificação ser revertida !
I vote for you undo this change !
I vote for you undo this change !
wb...@gmail.com <wb...@gmail.com> #113
I need this feature.
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #114
Fixx
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #115
Open Source... ?
I need this feature restored as soon as possible.
Kitkat is killing my Nexus battery. Probably due to the "improved" gnow intagration.
Fix!
I need this feature restored as soon as possible.
Kitkat is killing my Nexus battery. Probably due to the "improved" gnow intagration.
Fix!
ac...@gmail.com <ac...@gmail.com> #116
What happened to open-source?? Come on google remove the restriction pls.
fo...@gmail.com <fo...@gmail.com> #117
I would like them back too
co...@gmail.com <co...@gmail.com> #118
Please add them
el...@gmail.com <el...@gmail.com> #119
Add them.
[Deleted User] <[Deleted User]> #120
Please fix so I can monitor my battery again without root
tf...@gmail.com <tf...@gmail.com> #121
[Comment deleted]
tf...@gmail.com <tf...@gmail.com> #122
Dont you guys understand why Google dont want us to see stats? Because almost all the time the problem of drain has to do with
google services. Google just doesn't want people to deactivate their services, instead of fixing the bugs.
People, dont you realise? Android will become closer and closer. It already started a few versions ago. It will become almost
as closed as Apple. Mark my words. Keep this message. From 3/4 years you will see. This is not a hunch, it's just
facts...
I hope Tizen soars up, and be a viable alternative and aim to be to what Android used to be.
google services. Google just doesn't want people to deactivate their services, instead of fixing the bugs.
People, dont you realise? Android will become closer and closer. It already started a few versions ago. It will become almost
as closed as Apple. Mark my words. Keep this message. From 3/4 years you will see. This is not a hunch, it's just
facts...
I hope Tizen soars up, and be a viable alternative and aim to be to what Android used to be.
ja...@gmail.com <ja...@gmail.com> #123
I dont want to root my phone just to monitor battery stats!
bl...@gmail.com <bl...@gmail.com> #124
I would like to be able to continue using battery consumption monitoring apps such as gsam, better battery stats, battery monitor, and other similar apps
ku...@gmail.com <ku...@gmail.com> #125
Please undo this
mi...@webskills.net <mi...@webskills.net> #126
Please revert this change or at least advertise why it was made in the first place.
ba...@gmail.com <ba...@gmail.com> #127
Please undo this
ku...@gmail.com <ku...@gmail.com> #128
I vote for this.
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #129
Information is necessary for a device owner to actually be in control.
The system must not withhold any information from the user.
Please revert the change.
The system must not withhold any information from the user.
Please revert the change.
js...@android.com <js...@android.com> #130
This permission enforcement is working as intended to protect user data. BatteryStats has never been a public API, so you cannot depend on its implementation.
hi...@gmail.com <hi...@gmail.com> #131
Can this bug be considered as feature request to make batterystats a public API?
gr...@gmail.com <gr...@gmail.com> #132
Please explain how viewing stats "protects" user data.
sv...@gmail.com <sv...@gmail.com> #133
No offense but could you please be a little more specific about "as intended" (until 4.4 that obviously was not important enough as the permission would be granted to an app).
The change to the permissions was made in 4.4 with a reference to a non-public issue number and I would be really happy to read about the intent if the issue would be made public.
The change to the permissions was made in 4.4 with a reference to a non-public issue number and I would be really happy to read about the intent if the issue would be made public.
gl...@gmail.com <gl...@gmail.com> #134
Google please respect the 800 people following this issue. If you care about privacy, stop games like Angry Birds from accessing my location, phone status and identity (imei, phone number) accounts/email addresses, etc, and bring back App Ops!
BATTERY_STATS should be a permission available for users to review when installing an app, like every other permission. 800 stars for loss of a "hidden api" speaks volumes.
Please mark it as enhancement and reopen it.
BATTERY_STATS should be a permission available for users to review when installing an app, like every other permission. 800 stars for loss of a "hidden api" speaks volumes.
Please mark it as enhancement and reopen it.
ga...@gmail.com <ga...@gmail.com> #135
Agreed with the above comments. This is a freakish disappointment, losing such a basic and essential feature for my everyday phone experience. Not being able to view my battery data has literally made me not want to upgrade my phone, since it's for work and I can't root it. Google, don't start acting childish like Apple...you'll lose your angle.
ht...@gmail.com <ht...@gmail.com> #136
I'm certainly not upgrading until this gets fixed. There's no reason for this change. If there were, why aren't we getting any more reason than "We intended it"? Only those with guilt hide things.
ea...@gmail.com <ea...@gmail.com> #137
You revoked access to flight mode via 3rd party apps - CyanogenMod offered access via profiles at user-definable points in time.
You're going to remove access to battery stats because of privacy concerns? Besides hoping for CyanogenMod to once again fix your bad decision, I wonder what guys at Google think is worth protecting when it comes to _real_ private data - trust me, we, the users, will never forget that NSA disaster.
You're going to remove access to battery stats because of privacy concerns? Besides hoping for CyanogenMod to once again fix your bad decision, I wonder what guys at Google think is worth protecting when it comes to _real_ private data - trust me, we, the users, will never forget that NSA disaster.
ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #138
Google please reconsider this change. Wakelock monitoring applications are very helpful for end users to get most out of their Android devices.
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #139
[Comment deleted]
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #140
[Comment deleted]
ad...@gmail.com <ad...@gmail.com> #141
I'm very glad to hear that this decision was made to protect user data. I for one would be very concerned if information about my battery usage was to be shared with app developers. As there is no facility in Android to allow the user to make choices about what data is shared with apps, then a blanket ban is clearly the only solution. If Android ever develops such a facility (you could call it 'Permissions'), you might want to consider allowing users to decide which apps access which data on a fine-grained basis - you could call such a feature 'App Ops'.
Anyway, thanks for guarding user data so zealously!
Anyway, thanks for guarding user data so zealously!
tf...@gmail.com <tf...@gmail.com> #142
Protecting user data? Lolada!
Really do you think we are all imbeciles? What is this? Are you kidding with us? Protecting user data??? What a joke... At least say we dont want and that it's. We are going to close the platform, because we want. We want to drain your battery tracking every place you are, everything message you type and conversation you make. Just dont joke with us...
Really do you think we are all imbeciles? What is this? Are you kidding with us? Protecting user data??? What a joke... At least say we dont want and that it's. We are going to close the platform, because we want. We want to drain your battery tracking every place you are, everything message you type and conversation you make. Just dont joke with us...
dr...@gmail.com <dr...@gmail.com> #143
For those that are rooted, you can regain this functionality via an Xposed module: http://repo.xposed.info/module/com.gsamlabs.xposed.mods.enablebatterystatspermission
Works with all of the battery stats apps that I've tried.
Works with all of the battery stats apps that I've tried.
cs...@googlemail.com <cs...@googlemail.com> #144
This is outrageous! When I woke up this morning, my Nexus 4 had turned itself off and would not turn on again until I connected the charger. Because you are "protecting" the user from too much knowledge, I am unable to find out which app caused this. This could happen again any time, making me lose trust in my Android devices. Any more decisions like these and users will stop talking of rooting, calling it jailbreaking instead.
fo...@gmail.com <fo...@gmail.com> #145
I don't think this decision was made to protect user data. I think it just makes a lot of users can not know many system processes consume power
jj...@gmail.com <jj...@gmail.com> #146
I do not feel that this is fair to this user and that it should not be allowed to keep "battery consumption"
Fallenangelzunite13@Gmail.com
Fallenangelzunite13@Gmail.com
su...@gmail.com <su...@gmail.com> #147
I believe we should be able to enable it somehow, so make this as default option with posibilities to change it, do not make decision for us!
r....@gmail.com <r....@gmail.com> #148
It's clearly made to stop us botching about how wake lock infested Google kernels are... Airplane mode, gps, now battery stats, hey Google why don't you bad other keyboard apps? You never know what they might be logging... At which point I'll basically have an iPhone with a bigger screen in my hands :)
bo...@gmail.com <bo...@gmail.com> #149
I did not see any valuable data needs to be protect regarding Battery
stats. Battery time have limitation similarly to limited storage. My reason
to uninstall app is determined by both size of app and time of battery
consumed. Could you explain what kind of user data you want to protect?
stats. Battery time have limitation similarly to limited storage. My reason
to uninstall app is determined by both size of app and time of battery
consumed. Could you explain what kind of user data you want to protect?
ra...@gmail.com <ra...@gmail.com> #150
Battery stats should not be compliant to root as they are not a security risk. Having to access root is countertuitive since after root access given, kernel is open to console attack.
bh...@gmail.com <bh...@gmail.com> #151
Please revert back access to batt_stats
lu...@gmail.com <lu...@gmail.com> #152
Do it!!!
va...@gmail.com <va...@gmail.com> #153
My Android device is sometimes during the night consuming more battery than normal. The only effective way to figure out the culprit in such cases is to use apps like BetterBatteryStats and to look at the wakelocks and partial wakelocks. Google, please give us back this possibility without having to root the phone!
co...@gmail.com <co...@gmail.com> #154
Come on google re-enable this as my N5 is waking up my wi-fi every few minutes for no discernible reason, I need access again.
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #155
Vote!
Change it back!
Change it back!
br...@gmail.com <br...@gmail.com> #156
jsharkey@android.com: "WorkingAsIntended" may be true, but the note you provide in changing the status of this bug is absolutely *useless*. Not only does it not answer the questions from which the bug arose, it creates more questions. An evasive Republican politician could not have done better.
1. What user data is being protected and from whom?
2. Presuming you can answer #1, how is the withholding of that user data from everyone, including the user, protecting them? What is the risk involved in the revelation of this at-risk data, both to the user himself and to the public at-large.
3. "WorkingAsIntended" is the status of this bug. What is the intent? And whose intent, exactly.
This was a *change*, a purposeful change from the way it was before to the way it is now. To simply say, "oh, this was on purpose" as your answer to the (at time of writing) 873 people who are concerned enough about the effects of this change to have starred this bug is ridiculous and offensive within an *ecosystem* that even pretends to be open-source.
If this was done for a reason, to fix a problem, what was the problem? What was the reason? What hole are you plugging? You have *got* to be able to do better than that.
Please note, I am *not* assuming that this change was bad. Your reasons may make perfect sense. But enough of us have no clue what a sensible reason could possibly be that there are 873 stars up there.
C'mon, really?
1. What user data is being protected and from whom?
2. Presuming you can answer #1, how is the withholding of that user data from everyone, including the user, protecting them? What is the risk involved in the revelation of this at-risk data, both to the user himself and to the public at-large.
3. "WorkingAsIntended" is the status of this bug. What is the intent? And whose intent, exactly.
This was a *change*, a purposeful change from the way it was before to the way it is now. To simply say, "oh, this was on purpose" as your answer to the (at time of writing) 873 people who are concerned enough about the effects of this change to have starred this bug is ridiculous and offensive within an *ecosystem* that even pretends to be open-source.
If this was done for a reason, to fix a problem, what was the problem? What was the reason? What hole are you plugging? You have *got* to be able to do better than that.
Please note, I am *not* assuming that this change was bad. Your reasons may make perfect sense. But enough of us have no clue what a sensible reason could possibly be that there are 873 stars up there.
C'mon, really?
va...@gmail.com <va...@gmail.com> #157
Please change this feature back. I don't care if we cannot depend on its implementation, we still will depend on it as it has being giving us the correct information previously.
om...@gmail.com <om...@gmail.com> #158
Revert this immediately.
ed...@gmail.com <ed...@gmail.com> #159
Google = Big Brother?
xc...@gmail.com <xc...@gmail.com> #160
I vote for this
co...@gmail.com <co...@gmail.com> #161
i agreed plse revert back , that we have this option to use !!!!!!
We all know as Android users you" suffer" battery drain, from time to time !!
This option is important to us,
i have pinpointed a few 3rd apps ,in past causing wakelocks /battery drain
i could monitor the app or change apps settings or uninstall
thank you
We all know as Android users you" suffer" battery drain, from time to time !!
This option is important to us,
i have pinpointed a few 3rd apps ,in past causing wakelocks /battery drain
i could monitor the app or change apps settings or uninstall
thank you
os...@gmail.com <os...@gmail.com> #162
I also vote for this. Closing the battery stats API will only result in further giving Android a bad reputation for poor battery life. "Don't be evil."
wi...@gmail.com <wi...@gmail.com> #163
I was just reading Wikiepdia list of "Features" for Android version 4.4, and down the list I find this. This isn't a "Feature", this is eliminating essential capabilities!
Google / Android"
Please make Battery Stats available so users can maintain control of our devices.
Runaway battery drains are a significant problem, and being able to use apps that monitor such behavior is necessary to keep our phones working correctly.
Since an Android dev "jsharkey" already responded, said this change is "working as intended", it's unfortunately likely that Google is just giving the 907 of who have Starred this issue a big middle finger.
Ah, well. At least there are ROMs out there like CyanogenMod, that maintain features that users want, as well as adding new ones (and removing all the Google bullsh!t)
"Don't Be Evil" => "Be Evil For Growth and PROFIT!!!"
Google / Android"
Please make Battery Stats available so users can maintain control of our devices.
Runaway battery drains are a significant problem, and being able to use apps that monitor such behavior is necessary to keep our phones working correctly.
Since an Android dev "jsharkey" already responded, said this change is "working as intended", it's unfortunately likely that Google is just giving the 907 of who have Starred this issue a big middle finger.
Ah, well. At least there are ROMs out there like CyanogenMod, that maintain features that users want, as well as adding new ones (and removing all the Google bullsh!t)
"Don't Be Evil" => "Be Evil For Growth and PROFIT!!!"
mn...@gmail.com <mn...@gmail.com> #164
Hier ist meine Stimme. Bitte wieder rueckgaengig machen, Batterie-Statistiken sind sehr nuetzlich.
ra...@gmail.com <ra...@gmail.com> #165
I vote for this as well, battery information is quite useful for android users and rooting is not an option on a note 3.
jp...@gmail.com <jp...@gmail.com> #166
This is also a very important feature for me.
If there is a security issue with it, just fix the security issue, don't drop the wholefeature!!!
If there is a security issue with it, just fix the security issue, don't drop the wholefeature!!!
ma...@googlemail.com <ma...@googlemail.com> #167
I vote for this, too!
je...@gmail.com <je...@gmail.com> #168
All involved with removing this permission should be ashamed of themselves. Do you think we are stupid? There was no "sensitive" data being exposed by that permission.
This really looks to me like some PM who couldn`t produce anything useful wanted to look like they were doing work so they removed permissions under the 'ol 'security concerns' blanket. I have trouble believing a decent person would be interested in cutting developers off from useful and safe functionality.
This really looks to me like some PM who couldn`t produce anything useful wanted to look like they were doing work so they removed permissions under the 'ol 'security concerns' blanket. I have trouble believing a decent person would be interested in cutting developers off from useful and safe functionality.
ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #169
I'd like to see access to batterystats added back to Android.
ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #170
With the new updates I've been experiencing very bad battery drains. I would normally use battery analysis apps to figure out what is causing them (the stock analysis is NOT detailed enough). This is no longer possible and is a big hit to the usability of Android OS.
im...@gmail.com <im...@gmail.com> #171
SHUT UP AND LET THE DEVELOPERS UPDATE THIS WITH USEFUL INFORMATION!!
pd...@gmail.com <pd...@gmail.com> #172
We do not know whichapplication is draining battery and we do not want to root please give accesses to Battery drain
App
App
ra...@gmail.com <ra...@gmail.com> #173
Google why this restrictions, reason to leave Nokia Symby was the same again. Previously it was not so restricted but later on it went on and on and one day I left. I think it is again high time to search something which do not restrict so much. One more unnecessery restriction by Google in kitkat is applications cannot write SDcard. It is my SDcard why google decides my applications cannot write and his own can??
ca...@gmail.com <ca...@gmail.com> #174
As paid a user of Batter Drain Analyzer I would like Google to give me a refund because the app is essentially useless. It is unfair to both app users and app creators to make changes lile blocking access to battery stats with any explanation. Please don't be evil Google, please don't become like Apple.
rh...@gmail.com <rh...@gmail.com> #175
Well we are up to 947 stars and no more info from jsharkey@android.com.
I guess we can assume that the speculation is correct and they removed this from us so we cannot see that Google apps are the culprits for all the excessive battery drainage.
If this is not true then you jsharkey or someone else from Android needs to provide the answers to post #155.
Please fill us in one way or the other so we can decide if Google is worth supporting in our future purchases.
I guess we can assume that the speculation is correct and they removed this from us so we cannot see that Google apps are the culprits for all the excessive battery drainage.
If this is not true then you jsharkey or someone else from Android needs to provide the answers to post #155.
Please fill us in one way or the other so we can decide if Google is worth supporting in our future purchases.
st...@gmail.com <st...@gmail.com> #176
My guess is Google knowingly is using apps to do some devious (Do Evil!) things now. So they don't want you to see how many kernel wakes occur as they monitor using the phone microphone (sic) your office and your wifi SSID building the mega data warehouse. Now you can't turn off the WiFi and several other features are constantly running. What killed your battery...the monitoring of stuff did...I smell a RAT!
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #177
Could we please get an update on the status? Coming from Apple, I used to complain about the monolithic culture of secrets.. but at least they were concerned with perfecting the user experience. Every experience I've had with Android DEVICES has been great, but every issue I've had with the OS itself has turned out to be related to Google implementing changes out-of-the-blue. If anyone would like to join an organization dedicated to independently auditing Google's code on behalf of device manufacturers before they will deploy in future please get in touch.
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #178
As a user, I would also like to see this.
ds...@gmail.com <ds...@gmail.com> #179
Bring this back google.
m....@gmail.com <m....@gmail.com> #180
I can accept that the permission was removed, but only if you also implement a change so that a wakelock can't keep the device awake for extendes periods of time. I realize this may break some apps, but that it better than the current situation. Perhaps then the app developers will learn not to abuse wakelocks.
As it is now, it is impossible to diagnose a wakelock issue with an app.
As it is now, it is impossible to diagnose a wakelock issue with an app.
ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #181
Wow great to use this
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #182
need the feature back...
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #183
Please make kitkat more user friendly. .. Otherwise after so many years of android this is the first time I am starting to find an iphone a more attractive option. How sad is that google? My Samsung battery life is useless. ..nah... lifeless since google's horrible kitkat update... and to add insult to injury I can't now see
what's draining my battery. How dare Google spoil something which worked beautifully. :(
what's draining my battery. How dare Google spoil something which worked beautifully. :(
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #184
Who on earth said this was priority "small" ... I dont think so! !!
ju...@gmail.com <ju...@gmail.com> #185
This new feature is killing by battery time as I now can't figure out what is using up all my power. My battery time used to be over 3 days with average use before I needed to recharge. Now I'm at 50% by midday. I've now had to set Advanced Task Killer to Ultra high, Ultra aggressive just to get a full day out of my damn phone. If something doesn't change, I may end up going back to a Windows Phone *gasp!*.
Motorola MAXX HD
Motorola MAXX HD
gr...@mystakenidentity.com <gr...@mystakenidentity.com> #186
If this is a private API, then of course the standard "do not depend on this" applies. But the fact that so many people want access to it, and that there are some excellent applications like BetterBatteryStats, shows that it's something users want.
The beauty of Android is that you *can* meddle with it. For the masses who simply want Facebook and Candy Crush, they can do that with an out-the-box SGS5. For those of us who do want to customise things, that's the USP of Android over iOS or WP. And whilst us tinkerers might be the minority, we're the vocal minority that makes the majority buy the products in the first place. So keep us happy!
The beauty of Android is that you *can* meddle with it. For the masses who simply want Facebook and Candy Crush, they can do that with an out-the-box SGS5. For those of us who do want to customise things, that's the USP of Android over iOS or WP. And whilst us tinkerers might be the minority, we're the vocal minority that makes the majority buy the products in the first place. So keep us happy!
si...@gmail.com <si...@gmail.com> #187
Please give us back access, I want to be able to determine if any apps are draining way too much and get rid of them.
yu...@gmail.com <yu...@gmail.com> #188
This function is very important for ordinary users, if the issue is safety, so it really becomes the security problem.
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #189
The "explanation" given is absolutely comical. Nice to know that when a decision is stubborn and surreptitious enough, even a 4-digit number of starrings will be gladly ignored.
ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #190
I often find myself "diagnosing" battery problems, and finding the culprit apps of battery drain, but this change now makes that impossible to do. It should be reverted to what it was.
re...@gmail.com <re...@gmail.com> #191
I vote for this feature to be placed back. My sister has trouble with her tablet now and she is afraid of rooting to get it back! I have to root my 4.4.2 phone to do this and it's not right to remove a feature lots of people depend on! I have to see what wakelocks since I use my phone for my job. I have to be able to conserve while still using all the apps for my job. Lots of professionals in my field are angered by this move and some are sticking with 4.3 as long as they can.
ph...@gmail.com <ph...@gmail.com> #192
I vote for this feature too, to be placed back.
sy...@gmail.com <sy...@gmail.com> #193
I vote for this feature too. I cant count how many times an app is updated and creates unforeseen battery drain. We need tools to be able to spot these.
va...@gmail.com <va...@gmail.com> #194
I vote for this feature. Google be fair and play fair. Taking away permissions in undocumented way is not Google Way !!!! Then why ???????????????????
br...@gmail.com <br...@gmail.com> #195
I want this permission changed back too
ji...@gmail.com <ji...@gmail.com> #196
vote
st...@gmail.com <st...@gmail.com> #197
Needed feature! Put it back!
kc...@gmail.com <kc...@gmail.com> #198
Please add this back!
al...@gmail.com <al...@gmail.com> #199
Why would you remove diagnostic tools? Please make it available again
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #200
@198: "to protect user data" as said in #129 which is utterly hilarious excuse.
lb...@gmail.com <lb...@gmail.com> #201
@199 but that's just statistics on apps...
I could already get which apps the user has installed, and get which are running or at least have live processes.
I could already get which apps the user has installed, and get which are running or at least have live processes.
to...@tombeauchamp.com <to...@tombeauchamp.com> #202
More like "WorkingAsIdiotsIntended"
va...@gmail.com <va...@gmail.com> #203
Removing this feature is absurd. Why can't I check which apps are draining my battery?
ga...@gmail.com <ga...@gmail.com> #204
I would like this feature so to track battery usage better
ch...@gmail.com <ch...@gmail.com> #205
I'd like to be able to understand what is using my battery so quickly.this is a ridiculous feature to remove
ub...@gmail.com <ub...@gmail.com> #206
Seeing "Android OS" taking over 80% of battery power without any chance (no, i don't want to root my phone) to analyse the causes makes me sick!
If you don't check the apps on google play properly, give the users the chance to solve problems theirselves.
In my point of view this is the biggest non-security-issue since android exists.
If you don't check the apps on google play properly, give the users the chance to solve problems theirselves.
In my point of view this is the biggest non-security-issue since android exists.
da...@gmail.com <da...@gmail.com> #207
I agree. Please allow access to this information.
po...@gmail.com <po...@gmail.com> #208
I DEMAND this gets fixed! What brain damaged neckbearded code monkey thought this would be a funny joke to play?!?!? I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery. I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery.I shouldn't have to root my phone to find out what app is draining my battery. IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH!??!?!?
sd...@gmail.com <sd...@gmail.com> #209
Google is busted. Give us back our battery stats
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #210
Still needs to be fixed. If this is "Working as Intended" then it's "Broken as designed."
How come no further explanation has been given?
The only consequence of this is it's going to push more people to root their phones to install status utilities, which kind of defeats the purpose of protecting user data.
How come no further explanation has been given?
The only consequence of this is it's going to push more people to root their phones to install status utilities, which kind of defeats the purpose of protecting user data.
br...@gmail.com <br...@gmail.com> #211
Need to know what is draining my battery.
wx...@gmail.com <wx...@gmail.com> #212
what is the reason why removed batterinfo Service from Android4.4!?
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #213
@209: "How come no further explanation has been given?"
Because it is working as intended, duh! But the silence on this pretty much speaks for itself, meaning the protecting user data is BS excuse and cover up for whatever they're planning now or in the future. Perhaps it is not a coincidence that Google Play Services has its own share of wakelock issues?
Because it is working as intended, duh! But the silence on this pretty much speaks for itself, meaning the protecting user data is BS excuse and cover up for whatever they're planning now or in the future. Perhaps it is not a coincidence that Google Play Services has its own share of wakelock issues?
ci...@gmail.com <ci...@gmail.com> #214
#213
I agree. This affects consumers adversely. Yet, not even a comment is made in response.
I agree. This affects consumers adversely. Yet, not even a comment is made in response.
s....@gmail.com <s....@gmail.com> #215
[Comment deleted]
ru...@gmail.com <ru...@gmail.com> #216
Give your permission Google ass holes
jd...@gmail.com <jd...@gmail.com> #217
We're talking about getting information from the system here, compare to giving it instructions, so why block this possibility ?
kr...@gmail.com <kr...@gmail.com> #218
Vote!
Change it back
Change it back
md...@gmail.com <md...@gmail.com> #219
The only reasons I could see that paid employees would take salaried time to *REMOVE* a working feature like this from Android would be that it was too hard to maintain (which I doubt, but can't rule out) or to make it harder for users to learn how much battery Google Play, Google/carrier services, and/or Google/carrier analytics drain from their device. I suspect the latter.
The solution is to either improve battery technology or write more efficient software, not to make it harder for people to discover the problems.
If my suspicion is correct, this wouldn't be the first time Google developers erred on the side of being lazy even when it meant producing far inferior software.
Luckily, sometimes the Google developers come to their senses and reverse course (like forhttps://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=315401 ) so I think this feature will be restored at some point in the future.
Does anyone honestly believe that Google will require users to root their phone in order to see accurate battery stats in every Android version from now until the end of time?
Does anyone actually think that the Android developers believe this?
The solution is to either improve battery technology or write more efficient software, not to make it harder for people to discover the problems.
If my suspicion is correct, this wouldn't be the first time Google developers erred on the side of being lazy even when it meant producing far inferior software.
Luckily, sometimes the Google developers come to their senses and reverse course (like for
Does anyone honestly believe that Google will require users to root their phone in order to see accurate battery stats in every Android version from now until the end of time?
Does anyone actually think that the Android developers believe this?
wp...@gmail.com <wp...@gmail.com> #220
[Comment deleted]
wp...@gmail.com <wp...@gmail.com> #221
For what it's worth: I've just upgraded me and my wife's phones to the otherwise very nice Note 4. The new phones use Kitkat at present, and I immediately ran smack-bang into this problem. W.T.F.?
How is userland applications meant to monitor battery statistics? This seems totally asinine. I really don't want to root my phone just to get battery stats. (Never had to do this before, don't really want to do it now!) Come on Google, my trust in you has just taken a very unexpected hit...
How is userland applications meant to monitor battery statistics? This seems totally asinine. I really don't want to root my phone just to get battery stats. (Never had to do this before, don't really want to do it now!) Come on Google, my trust in you has just taken a very unexpected hit...
ha...@android.com <ha...@android.com> #222
Battery stats contains a lot of sensitive personal data -- email addresses, deep information about how the user has been using the device, arbitrary strings of tags coming from apps that has who-knows-what private data in them.
This was never a published API in the SDK. We try very hard to support the APIs that we do publish in the SDK as a contract with developers. At the same time, we are very clear that going outside of the SDK means you are using private implementation details that are not intended for use by apps and will change and break arbitrarily as the platform evolves. The permission itself being accessible to apps was an oversight (giving them access to something there is no support for them to use), and became increasingly problematic as more and more detailed and personal data appeared in the battery stats collection, so it was important for that security hole to be closed.
The way users can monitor their battery use is with the battery use UI in settings. That is populated by the same data here.
There is no plan to provide an official SDK API for this data, given how much sensitive information is contained in it.
This was never a published API in the SDK. We try very hard to support the APIs that we do publish in the SDK as a contract with developers. At the same time, we are very clear that going outside of the SDK means you are using private implementation details that are not intended for use by apps and will change and break arbitrarily as the platform evolves. The permission itself being accessible to apps was an oversight (giving them access to something there is no support for them to use), and became increasingly problematic as more and more detailed and personal data appeared in the battery stats collection, so it was important for that security hole to be closed.
The way users can monitor their battery use is with the battery use UI in settings. That is populated by the same data here.
There is no plan to provide an official SDK API for this data, given how much sensitive information is contained in it.
ef...@gmail.com <ef...@gmail.com> #223
Fair enough regarding the security implications of the information contained therein. So how about you provide more information in the battery use UI then, things like wakelock count for the various app, services, etc, kind of merge BetterBatteryStats into your UI, this way we get the information we need/want, and you keep your security.
ht...@gmail.com <ht...@gmail.com> #224
Email addresses in battery stats? That's what it's come down to?
Man, it's a good thing my Root-enabled application can't access that, it might not be able to get it from the generic accounts-selection databases then!
Man, it's a good thing my Root-enabled application can't access that, it might not be able to get it from the generic accounts-selection databases then!
re...@gmail.com <re...@gmail.com> #225
really is it THAT embarrassing that you have only 18% battery though...
and it's simple... you don't want tracked? stay off the internet!
and it's simple... you don't want tracked? stay off the internet!
fo...@gmail.com <fo...@gmail.com> #226
A year has passed, just get a reply there is no a plan, I think it can add to appopsmanager.
by...@gmail.com <by...@gmail.com> #227
how abut evolving the stock 'battery stats' into direction that 'better battety stats' points (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.asksven.betterbatterystats )
some of us wants to know a bit more about their devices and haw they behave under certain circumstances, so maybe let us chose either to share or not share such permission via developer menu with a 'must click' description that we might be sharing some sensitive data.
vanilla battery stats does not provide the kind of detailed battery data some of us wants to have access to and i do not like rooting my device only to check detailed stats about my battery
you know well it is a doable thing
some of us wants to know a bit more about their devices and haw they behave under certain circumstances, so maybe let us chose either to share or not share such permission via developer menu with a 'must click' description that we might be sharing some sensitive data.
vanilla battery stats does not provide the kind of detailed battery data some of us wants to have access to and i do not like rooting my device only to check detailed stats about my battery
you know well it is a doable thing
a....@gmail.com <a....@gmail.com> #228
#221
Finally some sort of answer. Thanks.
Users HAVE to use the UI, that you provide? Devs aren't "allowed" to provide a better solution anymore? Is it just me, or does this sound like Apple?
Anyway - as others (eg. #222) have stated - what, if certain users want more insight? Your UI just doesn't cut it. Maybe it does for a certain (probably huge) part of the users, but not for all. How are they supposed to customize the "Android experience" (or should they have to live with what Ap^H^HGoogle provides?)?
Finally some sort of answer. Thanks.
Users HAVE to use the UI, that you provide? Devs aren't "allowed" to provide a better solution anymore? Is it just me, or does this sound like Apple?
Anyway - as others (eg. #222) have stated - what, if certain users want more insight? Your UI just doesn't cut it. Maybe it does for a certain (probably huge) part of the users, but not for all. How are they supposed to customize the "Android experience" (or should they have to live with what Ap^H^HGoogle provides?)?
mi...@gmail.com <mi...@gmail.com> #229
As of Android 5.0 I've been having the very nice issue that your UI doesn't even add up to 100% anymore, coupled with crazy battery drain. Like 50% gone in 3 hours, with the UI happily reporting use that totals no more than 25%.
I understand the change if other data was being populated here that presented privacy issues, but wakelock data should be made accessible separately then. Otherwise, there's no way for users to even begin reviewing issues like mine.
I understand the change if other data was being populated here that presented privacy issues, but wakelock data should be made accessible separately then. Otherwise, there's no way for users to even begin reviewing issues like mine.
su...@gmail.com <su...@gmail.com> #230
The answer is a complete example of "bullshit bingo" game. But this is not surprising - Android was ruined as 'open' platform in many ways. This ticket is just the example.
There were a lot of useful apps for battery-tracking and they were abandoned after KitKat release, thanks to this permission revoke. Instead of fixing API (separate personal/private data from the main goal of this API - tracked time of application usage) lets just hide it. And after removing UI from Lollipop, the API itself became useless. Tell me truth, that bullshit "Project Volta" is about removing good things from Android?
There were a lot of useful apps for battery-tracking and they were abandoned after KitKat release, thanks to this permission revoke. Instead of fixing API (separate personal/private data from the main goal of this API - tracked time of application usage) lets just hide it. And after removing UI from Lollipop, the API itself became useless. Tell me truth, that bullshit "Project Volta" is about removing good things from Android?
ma...@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> #231
In reply to comment #221 , I do appreciate the issue you're facing here. Clearly, having private information exposed in an API like this is not acceptable, and it had to be fixed. I guess I don't really understand why e-mail addresses were there in the first place? But it is what it is and the right answer was to pull the API.
But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't *have* an API. The built-in UI in 4.4 (and prior), frankly, sucks. And that should be OK. Every part of Android doesn't have to be the best thing since sliced bread. One of the strengths of the platform is that if you don't like a component, you can download a replacement. And now there is a glaring hole in that.
The right answer to this problem is to think hard about how do we create an API that meets the needs, and yet doesn't present a privacy and/or security risk? I can't believe that it is not possible to do so, nor that it is not worth it, given what is at stake. People who truly want this functionality are going to simply root their devices, and that is the opposite direction of where you want to go if you're trying to make things more secure.
And, lastly, this should have happened *before* the old API was pulled, with an overlap period to give developers a chance to migrate to the new way of doing things. Instead, what you have done is left people high and dry with zero notice, and the messaging that this sends to people is "we don't care."
But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't *have* an API. The built-in UI in 4.4 (and prior), frankly, sucks. And that should be OK. Every part of Android doesn't have to be the best thing since sliced bread. One of the strengths of the platform is that if you don't like a component, you can download a replacement. And now there is a glaring hole in that.
The right answer to this problem is to think hard about how do we create an API that meets the needs, and yet doesn't present a privacy and/or security risk? I can't believe that it is not possible to do so, nor that it is not worth it, given what is at stake. People who truly want this functionality are going to simply root their devices, and that is the opposite direction of where you want to go if you're trying to make things more secure.
And, lastly, this should have happened *before* the old API was pulled, with an overlap period to give developers a chance to migrate to the new way of doing things. Instead, what you have done is left people high and dry with zero notice, and the messaging that this sends to people is "we don't care."
au...@gmail.com <au...@gmail.com> #232
We do not not need E-mail addresses or anything else similarly "relevant"
in battery stats. We need stats on how battery is used.
in battery stats. We need stats on how battery is used.
e....@gmail.com <e....@gmail.com> #233
[Comment deleted]
sw...@gmail.com <sw...@gmail.com> #234
I agree that accessing battery information of other apps might be dangerous. But at least an app should be able to get the battery consumption information of itself.
an...@gmail.com <an...@gmail.com> #235
"Use the battery use UI in settings" -- if that was sufficient to diagnose battery issues we wouldn't need multiple 3rd-party apps using an unsupported API. How about you implement some of those features in system since you're the only ones that can?
at...@gmail.com <at...@gmail.com> #236
I would like to see this information back todon't alienate your customer base we can always move to the next
su...@gmail.com <su...@gmail.com> #237
Still not fixed in 2 years?
su...@gmail.com <su...@gmail.com> #238
[Comment deleted]
be...@gmail.com <be...@gmail.com> #239
Two years and no progress made? Oh dear.
Don't get me wrong, being able to access private information (email addresses etc.) is bad. But a battery statistics API is obvious. We don't necessarily need the old permission back, we need an alternative. As a user I'd love to know why my Xperia Z5 regularly goes into low battery mode (< 10%) in less than 16 hours since being unplugged. Yes I can supposedly look at the UI, but the stats disappear as soon as I'm on my next charge cycle. I need long term statistics so I can work out what is going on.
Don't get me wrong, being able to access private information (email addresses etc.) is bad. But a battery statistics API is obvious. We don't necessarily need the old permission back, we need an alternative. As a user I'd love to know why my Xperia Z5 regularly goes into low battery mode (< 10%) in less than 16 hours since being unplugged. Yes I can supposedly look at the UI, but the stats disappear as soon as I'm on my next charge cycle. I need long term statistics so I can work out what is going on.
ze...@gmail.com <ze...@gmail.com> #240
I've had all kinds of strange battery problems that I haven't been able to diagnose and eventually only fixed because my Nexus 6's screen shattered when dropped and I got a warranty replacement. I am extremely dismayed to find out that I need to root my phone and expose it to security risks just to see what's draining my battery. What gives? Please give access to these permissions back.
ha...@gmail.com <ha...@gmail.com> #241
Android used to be great until they started to follow Apple, restricting developers, closing APIs, taking control of everything.
Disabling developers to read Battery stats is the worst decision.
Now, they are removing many broadcasts in Android N. Making developers life even harder.
do you really think Dose mode can help users ?
Open the Battery stats permission for developers, let them use their creativity to develop tools so that users can optimize their battery life by their choice.
Disabling developers to read Battery stats is the worst decision.
Now, they are removing many broadcasts in Android N. Making developers life even harder.
do you really think Dose mode can help users ?
Open the Battery stats permission for developers, let them use their creativity to develop tools so that users can optimize their battery life by their choice.
to...@gmail.com <to...@gmail.com> #242
jo...@gmail.com <jo...@gmail.com> #243
I would like to be able to see my battery stats.
nd...@gmail.com <nd...@gmail.com> #244
I have a problem with my note 4
le...@gmail.com <le...@gmail.com> #245
This topic should be closed as this is for 4.4 (currently in 6.0-8.1)
be...@gmail.com <be...@gmail.com> #246
Did they add access to BATTERY_STATS back in? If not, it's still a relevant issue.
ti...@gmail.com <ti...@gmail.com> #247
@245: This has been won't fixed a long time ago...
This permission which used to require root can be given via adb shell too. Most battery/wakelock apps support that.
This permission which used to require root can be given via adb shell too. Most battery/wakelock apps support that.
le...@gmail.com <le...@gmail.com> #248
As far as I am aware no (quick Google search seems to only reference complaints of it been removed)
ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #249
I mean I ended up buying a new phone to "solve" the problem this caused for
me, so I guess it's working as intended... /s
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:01 PM, <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:
me, so I guess it's working as intended... /s
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:01 PM, <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:
nu...@gmail.com <nu...@gmail.com> #250
Sounds like Google wants to close this out because they're STEALING this for Android 8.1.
sv...@gmail.com <sv...@gmail.com> #251
@247 unfortunately the adb-dance is not for the masses. Looking into how many great apps rely on adb to grant specials perms these days I wish for an extension of the 'special app permissions' for users to grant perms like battery_info / battery_stats manually.
To me android always has been about tweaking and customizing and the option mentioned above does already exist for limited hand-picked perms so why not extending that list? That would embrace exactly in the spirit of giving power to the users.
To me android always has been about tweaking and customizing and the option mentioned above does already exist for limited hand-picked perms so why not extending that list? That would embrace exactly in the spirit of giving power to the users.
ro...@gmail.com <ro...@gmail.com> #252
I mean I know how to adb, but I don't hecking want to adb just to let an
app see what's draining my battery, I just want to download an app from the
play store, give it "read battery stats" permissions, and go on my way. I
absolutely agree that "You can just enable permissions in ADB!" is not a
viable solution here.
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:33 PM, <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:
app see what's draining my battery, I just want to download an app from the
play store, give it "read battery stats" permissions, and go on my way. I
absolutely agree that "You can just enable permissions in ADB!" is not a
viable solution here.
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:33 PM, <buganizer-system@google.com> wrote:
sl...@gmail.com <sl...@gmail.com> #253
How can I unsubscribe to this group? I never subscribed, I just started getting all the CC copies from this group today. I don't see unsubscribe anywhere.
by...@gmail.com <by...@gmail.com> #254
Google, just merge app code and let it be enabled from developer options, duh.
ka...@gmail.com <ka...@gmail.com> #255
@253: Click the star icon to unstar the bug. Poor UX; I just figured it out after ages of searching.
sl...@gmail.com <sl...@gmail.com> #256
@255: Well I just clicked the star next to 36983091 and now it is yellow. Totally backwards from what I expected but it is worth a try. Thanks.
Description
This permission and the access to batterystats - formerly known as batteryinfo - service is vital for use cases (and apps) dealing with analysing awake and wakeup causes (battery drainers) as this services gives access to partial wakelocks and alarms.
I wold like to request a rollback of the mentioned commit.