noah.gift - Project Hosting on Google Code

User Profile		Updates

Older Feb 27, 2009 snaketail r2 (checking in crude first prototype) committed - checking in crude first prototype checking in crude first prototype Feb 20, 2009 multicore-snmp multicore_0.1.0.py.zip (Multicore 0.1.0) file uploaded - Labels: Featured Type-Executable OpSys-Linux OpSys-OSX Labels: Featured Type-Executable OpSys-Linux OpSys-OSX Feb 20, 2009 multicore-snmp multicore.py.zip (Sample multicore-snmp example) file uploaded - Labels: Featured Type-Executable OpSys-OSX OpSys-Linux Labels: Featured Type-Executable OpSys-OSX OpSys-Linux Feb 20, 2009 multicore-snmp r5 (Adding the branch back, this time with some code ) committed - Adding the branch back, this time with some code Adding the branch back, this time with some code Feb 20, 2009 multicore-snmp r4 (deleting a branch ) committed - deleting a branch deleting a branch Feb 20, 2009 multicore-snmp r3 (checking in initial prototype) committed - checking in initial prototype checking in initial prototype Feb 20, 2009 multicore-snmp r2 (This is for an IBM Developerworks Article ) committed - This is for an IBM Developerworks Article This is for an IBM Developerworks Article Dec 31, 2008 pathtool r12 (adding generator walk) committed - adding generator walk adding generator walk Dec 31, 2008 pathtool r11 (adding working FileOb) committed - adding working FileOb adding working FileOb Dec 30, 2008 pathtool r10 (adding basics of file, dir objects) committed - adding basics of file, dir objects adding basics of file, dir objects Dec 30, 2008 pathtool r9 (removing cruft) committed - removing cruft removing cruft Dec 30, 2008 pathtool r8 (adding skeleton for tests) committed - adding skeleton for tests adding skeleton for tests Dec 30, 2008 pathtool r7 (adding docs and test directories) committed - adding docs and test directories adding docs and test directories Dec 30, 2008 pathtool r6 (juggling directories into a package) committed - juggling directories into a package juggling directories into a package Dec 30, 2008 pathtool r5 (adding version 2 of pathtool) committed - adding version 2 of pathtool adding version 2 of pathtool Nov 20, 2008 touchengine r13 (updating project to include a home page) committed - updating project to include a home page updating project to include a home page Nov 17, 2008 googleappengine issue 161 (Max number of files and blobs is 1000) commented on - It seems like the "Google way", would be to use this: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation/#googleDotLoad But, this does create a bottleneck if someone wants to use something that isn't currently supported. It might be nice to have a "Google Video" type system where users could upload their own libraries, and then the space would still be conserved as something on the back end could do a checksum to detect if these files had already been loaded. It seems like the "Google way", would be to use this: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation/#googleDotLoad But, this does create a bottleneck if someone wants to use something that isn't currently supported. It might be nice to have a "Google Video" type system where users could upload their own libraries, and then the space would still be conserved as something on the back end could do a checksum to detect if these files had already been loaded. Nov 12, 2008 rowgae pyworks_08_gae_tutorial_source_01.zip (pyworks_08_gae_tutorial_source_01) file uploaded - Labels: Featured Type-Source Labels: Featured Type-Source Nov 11, 2008 rowgae gae_pyworks08_tutorial.pdf (pyworks_08_gae_tutorial_presentation) file uploaded - Labels: Featured Type-Docs Labels: Featured Type-Docs Nov 11, 2008 rowgae pyworks_08_gae_tutorial_source.zip (pyworks_08_gae_tutorial_source) file uploaded - Labels: Featured Type-Source Labels: Featured Type-Source Nov 11, 2008 googleappengine issue 859 (Integrate AuthSub and Session Tokens with User's API in Weba...) reported - AuthSub is fairly verbose, and tedious to program with. Can you integrate it into the User's API, and probably expand session management for the Webapp framework so it can handle session tokens. AuthSub is fairly verbose, and tedious to program with. Can you integrate it into the User's API, and probably expand session management for the Webapp framework so it can handle session tokens. Nov 10, 2008 googleappengine issue 858 (Multi-User Administrative Interface for Webapp framework) reported - I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. Please create a Multi-user administrative Interface for the Webapp framework. This would be both administrative, and allow clients of a potential CMS to edit data. I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. Please create a Multi-user administrative Interface for the Webapp framework. This would be both administrative, and allow clients of a potential CMS to edit data. Nov 10, 2008 googleappengine issue 857 (Create decorator or some easy way to publish Webapp framewor...) reported - I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. Create decorator or some easy way to publish Webapp framework views as Atom or GData I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. Create decorator or some easy way to publish Webapp framework views as Atom or GData Nov 10, 2008 googleappengine issue 856 (Create architecture for Webapp framework that allows reusabl...) reported - I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. It would be great if there was WSGI middleware library that Google hosted that would allow people to integrate pre-built middleware and applications into there new project quickly. I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. It would be great if there was WSGI middleware library that Google hosted that would allow people to integrate pre-built middleware and applications into there new project quickly. Nov 10, 2008 googleappengine issue 855 (Please allow secure python code to run in template in Webapp...) reported - I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. If the webapp framework becomes enhanced in the future, please support the ability to run secure Python code in the template. Sometimes it can be an efficient way to solve a problem if used sparingly, but this should be a developers choice. I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. If the webapp framework becomes enhanced in the future, please support the ability to run secure Python code in the template. Sometimes it can be an efficient way to solve a problem if used sparingly, but this should be a developers choice. Nov 10, 2008 googleappengine issue 854 (Please allow secure python code to run in template in Webapp...) reported - I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. If the webapp framework becomes enhanced in the future, please support the ability to run secure Python code in the template. Sometimes it can be an efficient way to solve a problem if used sparingly, but this should be a developers choice. I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. If the webapp framework becomes enhanced in the future, please support the ability to run secure Python code in the template. Sometimes it can be an efficient way to solve a problem if used sparingly, but this should be a developers choice. Nov 10, 2008 googleappengine issue 853 (Integrate secure shopping cart with Google Checkout and Weba...) reported - I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. Please integrate a secure shopping cart that works with Google Checkouts into the webapp framework. I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. Please integrate a secure shopping cart that works with Google Checkouts into the webapp framework. Nov 10, 2008 googleappengine issue 852 (Please enhance sessions architecture) reported - I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. It would be useful to have the following features incorporated into a sessions architecture: * automatically place session in memcache * cookies * REST API for sessions, that corresponds correctly to the REST philosophy I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. It would be useful to have the following features incorporated into a sessions architecture: * automatically place session in memcache * cookies * REST API for sessions, that corresponds correctly to the REST philosophy Nov 10, 2008 googleappengine issue 851 (Natively Support GData API in AppEngine and enhance webapp A...) reported - I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. * Please allow GData to be a simple import for Google App Engine. I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. * Please allow GData to be a simple import for Google App Engine. Nov 10, 2008 googleappengine issue 850 (Create Robust Form Handling Library for Webapp Framework) reported - I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. Please create a robust Form Handling Library for the Webapp framework that is open source, preferably, with the following features: * Automatic HTML or Javascript Form creation from Datastore model introspection * Robust form validation with an API that allows a javascript "Flash" message to the user when invalid data is entered. * Form Widget API, that allows CSS and Javascript injection when forms are created via model introspection. I am breaking down feature requests for the Webapp, as previously specified in this ticket: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=833 As a potential pay business customer, I would like Google to natively support enhancements to the Webapp framework. Please create a robust Form Handling Library for the Webapp framework that is open source, preferably, with the following features: * Automatic HTML or Javascript Form creation from Datastore model introspection * Robust form validation with an API that allows a javascript "Flash" message to the user when invalid data is entered. * Form Widget API, that allows CSS and Javascript injection when forms are created via model introspection. Nov 08, 2008 liten RoadMap (Liten Roadmap) Wiki page edited Nov 08, 2008 liten RoadMap (Liten Roadmap) Wiki page edited Nov 08, 2008 liten RoadMap (Liten Roadmap) Wiki page edited Nov 08, 2008 liten issue 14 (Integrate Config File) Status changed - Status: Fixed Status: Fixed Nov 08, 2008 liten issue 7 (Calculate MB/GB/TB in output report) Status changed - Status: Fixed Status: Fixed Nov 08, 2008 liten RoadMap (Liten Roadmap) Wiki page edited Nov 08, 2008 liten RoadMap (Liten Roadmap) Wiki page edited Nov 03, 2008 pyatl-pylons r9 (adding bonus form validation via Jonathan Ellis) committed - adding bonus form validation via Jonathan Ellis adding bonus form validation via Jonathan Ellis Nov 01, 2008 googleappengine issue 833 (Continue To Enhance, and Support The Webapp Framework) reported - Please describe in detail the feature you would like to see included in Google App Engine: I see a clear value in Google offering a custom built web framework like Webapp, and continuing development. One of the reasons is that as a potential business customer, I want an API that reflects the environment it was built to serve. Webapp did something smart in forking a couple of third party libraries like Django and WebOb, and then mixing it with custom Google App Engine API's like Datastore. I think this web framework should continue to evolve as a default that a business, i.e. paying customer can depend on. By offering a default web framework that paying customers depend on, instead of punting that issue to 3rd party developers, it gives a more reliable impression to companies. Personally, I don't like the idea of running my business, or paying for a service where a large part of the API is in the hands of something where I can't file a complaint against. I think Red Hat has a very good business model that validates this approach, and I think it would be a mistake to "punt" the web framework development to somewhere else. Please describe in detail the feature you would like to see included in Google App Engine: I see a clear value in Google offering a custom built web framework like Webapp, and continuing development. One of the reasons is that as a potential business customer, I want an API that reflects the environment it was built to serve. Webapp did something smart in forking a couple of third party libraries like Django and WebOb, and then mixing it with custom Google App Engine API's like Datastore. I think this web framework should continue to evolve as a default that a business, i.e. paying customer can depend on. By offering a default web framework that paying customers depend on, instead of punting that issue to 3rd party developers, it gives a more reliable impression to companies. Personally, I don't like the idea of running my business, or paying for a service where a large part of the API is in the hands of something where I can't file a complaint against. I think Red Hat has a very good business model that validates this approach, and I think it would be a mistake to "punt" the web framework development to somewhere else.

issue 833 (Continue To Enhance, and Support The Webapp Framework) reported - Please describe in detail the feature you would like to see included in Google App Engine: I see a clear value in Google offering a custom built web framework like Webapp, and continuing development. One of the reasons is that as a potential business customer, I want an API that reflects the environment it was built to serve. Webapp did something smart in forking a couple of third party libraries like Django and WebOb, and then mixing it with custom Google App Engine API's like Datastore. I think this web framework should continue to evolve as a default that a business, i.e. paying customer can depend on. By offering a default web framework that paying customers depend on, instead of punting that issue to 3rd party developers, it gives a more reliable impression to companies. Personally, I don't like the idea of running my business, or paying for a service where a large part of the API is in the hands of something where I can't file a complaint against. I think Red Hat has a very good business model that validates this approach, and I think it would be a mistake to "punt" the web framework development to somewhere else.

Please describe in detail the feature you would like to see included in Google App Engine: I see a clear value in Google offering a custom built web framework like Webapp, and continuing development. One of the reasons is that as a potential business customer, I want an API that reflects the environment it was built to serve. Webapp did something smart in forking a couple of third party libraries like Django and WebOb, and then mixing it with custom Google App Engine API's like Datastore. I think this web framework should continue to evolve as a default that a business, i.e. paying customer can depend on. By offering a default web framework that paying customers depend on, instead of punting that issue to 3rd party developers, it gives a more reliable impression to companies. Personally, I don't like the idea of running my business, or paying for a service where a large part of the API is in the hands of something where I can't file a complaint against. I think Red Hat has a very good business model that validates this approach, and I think it would be a mistake to "punt" the web framework development to somewhere else.

Older