My favorites | Sign in
Google
       
Details: Show all Hide all

Older

  • Dec 02, 2009
    r107 (version bump) committed   -   version bump
    version bump
  • Dec 02, 2009
    r106 (solving bugs in cost_get) committed   -   solving bugs in cost_get
    solving bugs in cost_get
  • Nov 19, 2009
    r105 (bumped version) committed   -   bumped version
    bumped version
  • Nov 19, 2009
    r104 (generating the web site with more documentation) committed   -   generating the web site with more documentation
    generating the web site with more documentation
  • Nov 19, 2009
    r103 (refactoring media to avoid write elements as http headers) committed   -   refactoring media to avoid write elements as http headers
    refactoring media to avoid write elements as http headers
  • Nov 19, 2009
    r102 (refactoring site to avoid write elements as http headers) committed   -   refactoring site to avoid write elements as http headers
    refactoring site to avoid write elements as http headers
  • Nov 19, 2009
    r101 (removing eval calls) committed   -   removing eval calls
    removing eval calls
  • Nov 19, 2009
    r100 (refactoring the search class) committed   -   refactoring the search class
    refactoring the search class
  • Mar 18, 2009
    issue 89 (ability to run one scenario within a story from the command ...) commented on   -   I think we should implement two methods. The first one is straightforward, adding a command line option called 'scenario' with the description of the scenario that you want to run. i.e: java org.easyb.BehaviorRunner test.story -scenario 'Person object with all properties defined' The second one, adding the story line where the scenario is. i.e: java org.easyb.BehaviorRunner test.story:45
    I think we should implement two methods. The first one is straightforward, adding a command line option called 'scenario' with the description of the scenario that you want to run. i.e: java org.easyb.BehaviorRunner test.story -scenario 'Person object with all properties defined' The second one, adding the story line where the scenario is. i.e: java org.easyb.BehaviorRunner test.story:45
  • Mar 16, 2009
    r63 (release 0.1.7 ) committed   -   release 0.1.7
    release 0.1.7
  • Mar 16, 2009
    r62 (release 0.1.7 ready) committed   -   release 0.1.7 ready
    release 0.1.7 ready
  • Mar 16, 2009
    r61 (user pagination. Thanks to Raul Murciano) committed   -   user pagination. Thanks to Raul Murciano
    user pagination. Thanks to Raul Murciano
  • Mar 04, 2009
    r646 (shared behaviors some bugs fixed ) committed   -   shared behaviors some bugs fixed
    shared behaviors some bugs fixed
  • Feb 28, 2009
    r621 (building dependencies and gant tasks updated) committed   -   building dependencies and gant tasks updated
    building dependencies and gant tasks updated
  • Feb 25, 2009
    issue 134 (After seams not working) Status changed   -   It seems it's working properly in the development version, I endore my output: java -cp lib/ant-1.6.5.jar:lib/ant-googlecode-0.0.0test.jar:lib/commons-cli-1.1.jar:lib/groovy- 1.5.7.jar:easyb-0.9.4.jar org.disco.easyb.BehaviorRunner test.story -prettyprint Running test story (test.story) 10 11 oooooo Scenarios run: 1, Failures: 0, Pending: 0, Time elapsed: 0.406 sec 1 behavior ran with no failures 1 scenario executed successfully. Story: test scenario before after given test parameters before given test parameters after given test parameters after_each
    Status: Invalid
    It seems it's working properly in the development version, I endore my output: java -cp lib/ant-1.6.5.jar:lib/ant-googlecode-0.0.0test.jar:lib/commons-cli-1.1.jar:lib/groovy- 1.5.7.jar:easyb-0.9.4.jar org.disco.easyb.BehaviorRunner test.story -prettyprint Running test story (test.story) 10 11 oooooo Scenarios run: 1, Failures: 0, Pending: 0, Time elapsed: 0.406 sec 1 behavior ran with no failures 1 scenario executed successfully. Story: test scenario before after given test parameters before given test parameters after given test parameters after_each
    Status: Invalid
  • Feb 24, 2009
    issue 117 (ensureThrows list of exceptions) Status changed   -  
    Status: Fixed
    Status: Fixed
  • Feb 24, 2009
    r619 (fixes Issue 117: ensureThrows list of exceptions. Now it ...) committed   -   fixes Issue 117: ensureThrows list of exceptions. Now it support both syntaxes: ensureThrows(RuntimeException) {} ensureThrows([IllegalArgumentException, NullPointerException]) {} Documentation added as well.
    fixes Issue 117: ensureThrows list of exceptions. Now it support both syntaxes: ensureThrows(RuntimeException) {} ensureThrows([IllegalArgumentException, NullPointerException]) {} Documentation added as well.
  • Feb 24, 2009
    r618 (Pretty print option added. It shows the stories and specific...) committed   -   Pretty print option added. It shows the stories and specifications coloured by the command line if we use the flag -prettyprint. Documentation added for this feature and other undocumented syntax.
    Pretty print option added. It shows the stories and specifications coloured by the command line if we use the flag -prettyprint. Documentation added for this feature and other undocumented syntax.
  • Feb 03, 2009
    issue 110 (add shouldStartWith) Status changed   -  
    Status: Fixed
    Status: Fixed
  • Feb 03, 2009
    issue 111 (add shouldEndWith) Status changed   -  
    Status: Fixed
    Status: Fixed
  • Feb 03, 2009
    r594 (fixes #110: add shouldStartWith #111: add shouldEndWit...) committed   -   fixes #110: add shouldStartWith #111: add shouldEndWith
    fixes #110: add shouldStartWith #111: add shouldEndWith
  • Feb 03, 2009
    issue 129 (shouldBeA fails when comparing interfaces) Status changed   -  
    Status: Fixed
    Status: Fixed
  • Feb 03, 2009
    r593 (fixes #129: shouldBeA fails when comparing interfaces, thank...) committed   -   fixes #129: shouldBeA fails when comparing interfaces, thanks to Felipe Rodrigues added a shortcut to ensureThrows ValidationException: i.e: ensureFails { true.shouldBe false }
    fixes #129: shouldBeA fails when comparing interfaces, thanks to Felipe Rodrigues added a shortcut to ensureThrows ValidationException: i.e: ensureFails { true.shouldBe false }
  • Feb 03, 2009
    r592 (target names modified. the "validate-behaviors" task runs ju...) committed   -   target names modified. the "validate-behaviors" task runs just the behavior tests, the "validate- reports" task runs just the report tests and the "validate" task runs both. By default gant executes the "validate-behaviors" task.
    target names modified. the "validate-behaviors" task runs just the behavior tests, the "validate- reports" task runs just the report tests and the "validate" task runs both. By default gant executes the "validate-behaviors" task.
  • Feb 02, 2009
    issue 126 (Reports don't show specification after fixtures) Status changed   -  
    Status: Fixed
    Status: Fixed
  • Feb 02, 2009
    issue 101 (txt reports may miss some children) Status changed   -  
    Status: Fixed
    Status: Fixed
  • Feb 02, 2009
    issue 128 ([ENHANCEMENT] Reports refactor) Status changed   -  
    Status: Fixed
    Status: Fixed
  • Feb 02, 2009
    r591 (fixes several bugs: #101: txt reports may miss some child...) committed   -   fixes several bugs: #101: txt reports may miss some children #126: Reports don't show specification after fixtures #128: [ENHANCEMENT] Reports refactor
    fixes several bugs: #101: txt reports may miss some children #126: Reports don't show specification after fixtures #128: [ENHANCEMENT] Reports refactor
  • Feb 01, 2009
    issue 128 ([ENHANCEMENT] Reports refactor) Labels changed   -   hi, I've found a problem in the previous patch, I've solved it, I endorse a new one
    Labels: Type-Enhancement Type-Defect
    hi, I've found a problem in the previous patch, I've solved it, I endorse a new one
    Labels: Type-Enhancement Type-Defect
  • Feb 01, 2009
    issue 128 ([ENHANCEMENT] Reports refactor) reported   -   I've been working on a little refactor of the reports code. Basicaly I wanted to avoid duplicate code, and reorganize and clean the text and html report classes. What I did was: - The behavior steps know how to write themself in the reports. The behavior step type decides the indentation to apply and what's its text representation. - The ResultsCollector knows how to write the results as text. - I've removed logic from the html templates and I've moved it to the html helper. - The TxtStoryReportWriter and the TxtSpecificationReportWriter extend from a common class, TxtReportWriter that groups common code. Finally, if this patch is applied the issue 126 can be closed as well.
    I've been working on a little refactor of the reports code. Basicaly I wanted to avoid duplicate code, and reorganize and clean the text and html report classes. What I did was: - The behavior steps know how to write themself in the reports. The behavior step type decides the indentation to apply and what's its text representation. - The ResultsCollector knows how to write the results as text. - I've removed logic from the html templates and I've moved it to the html helper. - The TxtStoryReportWriter and the TxtSpecificationReportWriter extend from a common class, TxtReportWriter that groups common code. Finally, if this patch is applied the issue 126 can be closed as well.
  • Jan 30, 2009
    issue 126 (Reports don't show specification after fixtures) reported   -   it was my fault, I forgot to add it, I endorse the patch that solves the problem, sorry
    it was my fault, I forgot to add it, I endorse the patch that solves the problem, sorry
  • Jan 28, 2009
    issue 124 (update build scripts to work with the recent versions of Gan...) reported   -   Gant version 1.1.1 is obsolete, please update build scripts to use Gant's more recent versions. I endorse a patch that solves this issue.
    Gant version 1.1.1 is obsolete, please update build scripts to use Gant's more recent versions. I endorse a patch that solves this issue.
  • Jan 28, 2009
    issue 103 (add fixtures to .spec) commented on   -   so, this patch solves that problem XD
    so, this patch solves that problem XD
  • Jan 25, 2009
    issue 103 (add fixtures to .spec) commented on   -   this issue is fixed, isn't it? the spec WhenStartingBehaviourStep.specification works properly
    this issue is fixed, isn't it? the spec WhenStartingBehaviourStep.specification works properly
  • Jan 20, 2009
    issue 117 (ensureThrows list of exceptions) commented on   -   I endorse a patch that solves this issue
    I endorse a patch that solves this issue
  • Jan 20, 2009
    issue 110 (add shouldStartWith) commented on   -   it seems there is an error in the test scenario, but it's just a little mistake int the word "word": then "should end with word", { var.shouldEndWith "word" } should be: then "should end with world", { var.shouldEndWith "world" }
    it seems there is an error in the test scenario, but it's just a little mistake int the word "word": then "should end with word", { var.shouldEndWith "word" } should be: then "should end with world", { var.shouldEndWith "world" }
  • Jan 19, 2009
    issue 111 (add shouldEndWith) commented on   -   I've submitted a path in the issue #110 that also fixes this one.
    I've submitted a path in the issue #110 that also fixes this one.
  • Jan 19, 2009
    issue 110 (add shouldStartWith) commented on   -   this path fixes this issue and the next one #111: add shouldEndWith
    this path fixes this issue and the next one #111: add shouldEndWith
  • Jan 12, 2009
    r44 (multimedia tests) committed   -   multimedia tests
    multimedia tests
 
Powered by Google Project Hosting