My favorites | Sign in
Google
Project hosting will be READ-ONLY Wednesday, 7AM PST due to brief network maintenance
       
Details: Show all Hide all

Earlier this year

  • Sep 28, 2009
    issue 2864 (Please set sqlitecs as public domain type project) Status changed   -   It appears the project is sceduled for deletion. Marking won't fix.
    Status: WontFix
    It appears the project is sceduled for deletion. Marking won't fix.
    Status: WontFix
  • Jul 27, 2009
    issue 2901 (Add CeCILL to the List of Open Source Licenses) commented on   -   Gotcha.
    Gotcha.
  • Jul 27, 2009
    issue 2042 (Add Ms-PL open source license to available project ) commented on   -   Yes. Although lying is a bad idea, as we'll just ask you to change when we find it or someone lets us know about it.
    Yes. Although lying is a bad idea, as we'll just ask you to change when we find it or someone lets us know about it.
  • Jul 27, 2009
    issue 2053 (FDL not an option when picking license for project documenti...) Status changed   -   No, to combat license proliferation, fdl would have to show substantive growth before we would add it to the site.
    Status: WontFix
    No, to combat license proliferation, fdl would have to show substantive growth before we would add it to the site.
    Status: WontFix
  • Jul 27, 2009
    issue 2482 (Add the Boost license to the list of licenses for projects) Status changed   -   No, to combat license proliferation, ms-pl would have to show substantive growth before we would add it to the site.
    Status: WontFix
    No, to combat license proliferation, ms-pl would have to show substantive growth before we would add it to the site.
    Status: WontFix
  • Jul 27, 2009
    issue 2458 (adding non existing license type) Status changed   -   No, to combat license proliferation, ms-pl would have to show substantive growth before we would add it to the site.
    Status: WontFix
    No, to combat license proliferation, ms-pl would have to show substantive growth before we would add it to the site.
    Status: WontFix
  • Jul 27, 2009
    issue 2042 (Add Ms-PL open source license to available project ) Status changed   -   No, to combat license proliferation, ms-pl would have to show substantive growth before we would add it to the site.
    Status: WontFix
    No, to combat license proliferation, ms-pl would have to show substantive growth before we would add it to the site.
    Status: WontFix
  • Jul 27, 2009
    issue 2901 (Add CeCILL to the List of Open Source Licenses) Status changed   -   Sorry, we have no plans to support this license. Also, please take your complaints about the gnu site to that organization.
    Status: WontFix
    Sorry, we have no plans to support this license. Also, please take your complaints about the gnu site to that organization.
    Status: WontFix
  • May 27, 2009
    issue 2500 (Public domain license request for US Government open source ...) Status changed   -   ok, done. Enjoy!
    Status: Fixed
    ok, done. Enjoy!
    Status: Fixed
  • May 27, 2009
    issue 2500 (Public domain license request for US Government open source ...) commented on   -   Sure, I'll make this change for you. Sorry about the delay.
    Sure, I'll make this change for you. Sorry about the delay.
  • May 13, 2009
    issue 2575 (I am issuing a project under cddl, could that be added to th...) Status changed   -   Your assumption is correct.
    Status: WontFix
    Your assumption is correct.
    Status: WontFix
  • Apr 24, 2009
    issue 1355 (LGPL v2.1 and v3) commented on   -   We have projects that are under earlier versions, though, so just changing it implies that all projects under those licenses also have changed, which is likely untrue.
    We have projects that are under earlier versions, though, so just changing it implies that all projects under those licenses also have changed, which is likely untrue.
  • Apr 22, 2009
    issue 1355 (LGPL v2.1 and v3) commented on   -   I wouldnt' be against the drop down being changed to a 2.x and 3.x so long as the fsf doesn't introduce versions that substantively change the nature of the license.
    I wouldnt' be against the drop down being changed to a 2.x and 3.x so long as the fsf doesn't introduce versions that substantively change the nature of the license.
  • Apr 09, 2009
    issue 15 (Chrome(ium?) is not fully Open Source) commented on   -   The comment stream of a bug is a ridiculous place to discuss this issue. PAtches that would allow building other environments are interesting, though.
    The comment stream of a bug is a ridiculous place to discuss this issue. PAtches that would allow building other environments are interesting, though.
  • Mar 31, 2009
    Starred project cadie
  • Feb 25, 2009
    issue 2095 (Allow zlib license) commented on   -   Sorry, no. I like zlib as much as the next guy, but its just not important enough to counterbalance the deleterious effects produced by the introduction and promotion of minority licenses.
    Sorry, no. I like zlib as much as the next guy, but its just not important enough to counterbalance the deleterious effects produced by the introduction and promotion of minority licenses.
  • Feb 19, 2009
    Starred dclinton

Older

  • Nov 14, 2008
    issue 4403 (Everything is misspelled.) commented on   -   Turned out it was a corrupt dictionary. Removing the dictionary caused chrome to re-download a proper, non-corrupt dictionary.
    Turned out it was a corrupt dictionary. Removing the dictionary caused chrome to re-download a proper, non-corrupt dictionary.