My favorites | Sign in
Project Logo
                
New issue | Search
for
| Advanced search | Search tips
Issue 31: btree code has no unit test
1 person starred this issue and may be notified of changes. Back to list
Status:  Accepted
Owner:  cbsmith
Type-Defect
Priority-Medium
Milestone-Release10


Sign in to add a comment
 
Reported by daniel.r.kegel, Dec 22, 2007
We're planning to switch from a block-based
exception index to an extent-based index.
This is a tricky thing.  Once this is designed,
but before it's implemented, we probably want
to add a unit test for the btree code,
and use that to help bring up the new index.

This depends on the unit test framework (issue 29).
It probably will require some changes to better separate
the btree code from the rest of ddsnap;
see writeup in
http://zumastor.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/Cleanup_roadmap.txt
The reason to defer writing the unit test until
after the extent-based index is designed is
to help make sure that when we hoist btree
out of ddsnap, we do it in a way that isn't
likely to interfere with the extent rewrite.
Comment 1 by daniel.r.kegel, Feb 03, 2008
Deferring to 0.7
Labels: -Milestone-Release6 Milestone-Release7
Comment 2 by daniel.r.kegel, Mar 06, 2008
Late. Deferring.
Labels: -Milestone-Release7 Milestone-Release8
Comment 3 by williamanowak, Apr 23, 2008
Deferring.
Labels: -Milestone-Release8 Milestone-Release10
Sign in to add a comment

Hosted by Google Code