issue 206
(New HG plugin in progress) commented on by ywarnier
- Modifications are to be considered LGPL, of course.
Modifications are to be considered LGPL, of course.
Nov 25, 2009
issue 206
(New HG plugin in progress) commented on by ywarnier
- Here is the work so far. I have worked on a Xinc-2.0.0b196 package from PEAR and have
modified a few things from the Plugin/Repos directory, which I am attaching, compressed.
I'm not doing into the details for lack of time, but you should easily be able to get
a diff out from that.
Note that the package replaces the PHPUnit graph by a SimpleTest graph (preventing
the use of PHPUnit graph as mentionned in previous comments).
I have also modified the colors to get something a little bit less "flashy"
Here is the work so far. I have worked on a Xinc-2.0.0b196 package from PEAR and have
modified a few things from the Plugin/Repos directory, which I am attaching, compressed.
I'm not doing into the details for lack of time, but you should easily be able to get
a diff out from that.
Note that the package replaces the PHPUnit graph by a SimpleTest graph (preventing
the use of PHPUnit graph as mentionned in previous comments).
I have also modified the colors to get something a little bit less "flashy"
Nov 25, 2009
issue 206
(New HG plugin in progress) commented on by ywarnier
- Looks like there is no option to load another graph-drawing function than PHPUnit
without modifying the code in Plugin/Repos/Gui/Statistics/Build.php. I have been
forced to comment the line and put another one instead to load my SimpleTest class.
This being said, I suppose the PHPUnit function could be used for both (given the
results are the same) but it shouldn't be called that way.
Looks like there is no option to load another graph-drawing function than PHPUnit
without modifying the code in Plugin/Repos/Gui/Statistics/Build.php. I have been
forced to comment the line and put another one instead to load my SimpleTest class.
This being said, I suppose the PHPUnit function could be used for both (given the
results are the same) but it shouldn't be called that way.
Nov 25, 2009
issue 206
(New HG plugin in progress) commented on by ywarnier
- Looks like there is no option to load another graph-drawing function than PHPUnit
without modifying the code in Plugin/Repos/Gui/Statistics/Build.php. I have been
forced to comment the line and put another one instead to load my SimpleTest class.
This being said, I suppose the PHPUnit function could be used for both (given the
results are the same) but it shouldn't be called that way).
Looks like there is no option to load another graph-drawing function than PHPUnit
without modifying the code in Plugin/Repos/Gui/Statistics/Build.php. I have been
forced to comment the line and put another one instead to load my SimpleTest class.
This being said, I suppose the PHPUnit function could be used for both (given the
results are the same) but it shouldn't be called that way).
Nov 25, 2009
issue 206
(New HG plugin in progress) commented on by ywarnier
- I have a first half-working version of the Hg plugin. I will be working shortly on a
small integration with SimpleTest (instead of PHPUnit) to get the graphics right
(currently it is not reporting any test being executed).
I have a first half-working version of the Hg plugin. I will be working shortly on a
small integration with SimpleTest (instead of PHPUnit) to get the graphics right
(currently it is not reporting any test being executed).
Nov 24, 2009
issue 167
(Statistics graphs does not work) commented on by ywarnier
- Great, I just edited the file:
sudo vim /usr/share/php/Xinc/Plugin/Repos/Gui/Statistics/Graph.php
and added the bootstrap line on line 33 as suggested,
require 'ezc/Base/ezc_bootstrap.php';
restarted Apache and Xinc just to be sure and... there we go, got nice graphics. I
will probably investigate a bit further the graphics stuff as I'm using SimpleTest
and apparently the reporting stuff doesn't really come out as expected.
Great, I just edited the file:
sudo vim /usr/share/php/Xinc/Plugin/Repos/Gui/Statistics/Graph.php
and added the bootstrap line on line 33 as suggested,
require 'ezc/Base/ezc_bootstrap.php';
restarted Apache and Xinc just to be sure and... there we go, got nice graphics. I
will probably investigate a bit further the graphics stuff as I'm using SimpleTest
and apparently the reporting stuff doesn't really come out as expected.
Nov 22, 2009
issue 206
(New HG plugin in progress) reported by ywarn...@beeznest.org
- Hi guys,
I'm currently developing a mod of the SVN plugin to work with HG. It is not
complete just yet (still in alpha phase), but I would like to know where to
send it to for integration when finished.
Cheers,
Yannick
Hi guys,
I'm currently developing a mod of the SVN plugin to work with HG. It is not
complete just yet (still in alpha phase), but I would like to know where to
send it to for integration when finished.
Cheers,
Yannick
Aug 13, 2009
issue 205
(onrecovery publisher is failing) commented on by katrina.owen
- Ok, I've checked out 2.0.3, and have confirmed that this is still failing in that branch.
More info:
It seems like the status of the previous build is always set to -2, regardless of the
outcome. Not certain where the -2 is coming from (possibly modificationset/failed?)
Xinc_Build_Interface::FAILED equals 0
Xinc_Build_Interface::PASSED equals 1
Ok, I've checked out 2.0.3, and have confirmed that this is still failing in that branch.
More info:
It seems like the status of the previous build is always set to -2, regardless of the
outcome. Not certain where the -2 is coming from (possibly modificationset/failed?)
Xinc_Build_Interface::FAILED equals 0
Xinc_Build_Interface::PASSED equals 1
Aug 13, 2009
XincDevelopmentHowTo (Setting Up A Development Environment for Xinc) Wiki page commented on by katrina.owen
- Just a clarification on the symlink thing.
Is the expected directory structure like this?
{{{
mv /my/PEAR/base/Xinc /my/PEAR/base/Xinc_base
ln -s /my/working/copy/classes /my/PEAR/base/Xinc
}}}
such that the output when I do a directory listing would be
{{{
ls -la /my/PEAR/base/
lrwxr-xr-x 1 user group 50 Aug 13 21:44 Xinc -> /my/working/copy/classes/Xinc
-rw-r--r-- 1 user group 28226 Feb 19 18:42 Xinc.php
drwxr-xr-x 25 user group 850 Aug 13 20:48 Xinc_base
}}}
Should Xinc.php actually be renamed and symlinked to look at the development version of Xinc.php? Or can I leave it as is?
Just a clarification on the symlink thing.
Is the expected directory structure like this?
{{{
mv /my/PEAR/base/Xinc /my/PEAR/base/Xinc_base
ln -s /my/working/copy/classes /my/PEAR/base/Xinc
}}}
such that the output when I do a directory listing would be
{{{
ls -la /my/PEAR/base/
lrwxr-xr-x 1 user group 50 Aug 13 21:44 Xinc -> /my/working/copy/classes/Xinc
-rw-r--r-- 1 user group 28226 Feb 19 18:42 Xinc.php
drwxr-xr-x 25 user group 850 Aug 13 20:48 Xinc_base
}}}
Should Xinc.php actually be renamed and symlinked to look at the development version of Xinc.php? Or can I leave it as is?
Aug 13, 2009
issue 205
(onrecovery publisher is failing) commented on by katrina.owen
- Forgot to mention: I'm using version 2.0.0-b196
Forgot to mention: I'm using version 2.0.0-b196
Aug 13, 2009
issue 205
(onrecovery publisher is failing) reported by katrina.owen
- If I remove the "onsuccess" publisher, I only receive notification of
failures, no notification of recovery.
To reproduce:
1. Define onrecovery, onsuccess, and onfailure publishers
2. Make the build fail -- onfailure publisher gets processed (correctly)
3. Make the build pass -- onsuccess publisher gets processed (incorrectly)
4. Make the build pass again -- onsuccess publisher gets processed (correctly)
I would expect the onrecovery publisher to process on the first passing
build after a failure. Instead, this is seen as a 'success' rather than a
'recovery'.
----
This is my configuration:
<publishers>
<onfailure>
<email to="m...@email.com" subject="Build failed" message="$
{build.failure.message}" />
</onfailure>
<onrecovery>
<email to="m...@email.com" subject="Build recovered" message="$
{build.recovery.message}" />
</onrecovery>
<onsuccess>
<email to="m...@email.com" subject="Build succeeded" message="$
{build.success.message}" />
</onsuccess>
</publishers>
This is what my log says on the first successful build after a failure
(when no onsuccess is defined):
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Processing builders done
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
BUILD PASSED
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] Processing task:
publishers
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Processing publishers
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Last Build status: -2
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Processing publishers done
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] Setting loglevel
to 2
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] Next buildtime:
2009-06-03 11:40:12
If I define onsuccess (and onrecovery) this is what the log says on
the first success after a failure:
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Processing builders done
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
BUILD PASSED
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] Processing task:
publishers
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Processing publishers
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Last Build status: -2
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Publishing with OnSuccess Publishers
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Publishing with OnSuccess Publisher:
Xinc_Plugin_Repos_Publisher_Email_Task
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [project] hackday:
Executing email publisher with content (...)
If I remove the "onsuccess" publisher, I only receive notification of
failures, no notification of recovery.
To reproduce:
1. Define onrecovery, onsuccess, and onfailure publishers
2. Make the build fail -- onfailure publisher gets processed (correctly)
3. Make the build pass -- onsuccess publisher gets processed (incorrectly)
4. Make the build pass again -- onsuccess publisher gets processed (correctly)
I would expect the onrecovery publisher to process on the first passing
build after a failure. Instead, this is seen as a 'success' rather than a
'recovery'.
----
This is my configuration:
<publishers>
<onfailure>
<email to="m...@email.com" subject="Build failed" message="$
{build.failure.message}" />
</onfailure>
<onrecovery>
<email to="m...@email.com" subject="Build recovered" message="$
{build.recovery.message}" />
</onrecovery>
<onsuccess>
<email to="m...@email.com" subject="Build succeeded" message="$
{build.success.message}" />
</onsuccess>
</publishers>
This is what my log says on the first successful build after a failure
(when no onsuccess is defined):
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Processing builders done
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
BUILD PASSED
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] Processing task:
publishers
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Processing publishers
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Last Build status: -2
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Processing publishers done
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] Setting loglevel
to 2
[info] [2009-06-03 11:40:05-America/Los_Angeles] Next buildtime:
2009-06-03 11:40:12
If I define onsuccess (and onrecovery) this is what the log says on
the first success after a failure:
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Processing builders done
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
BUILD PASSED
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] Processing task:
publishers
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Processing publishers
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Last Build status: -2
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Publishing with OnSuccess Publishers
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [build] hackday:
Publishing with OnSuccess Publisher:
Xinc_Plugin_Repos_Publisher_Email_Task
[info] [2009-06-03 11:51:20-America/Los_Angeles] [project] hackday:
Executing email publisher with content (...)
Aug 04, 2009
issue 204
(Error by execution custom phpunit task) reported by grunichev
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create phing build task (it executes and work from command line)
2. Add this build to xinc
3. Got sh: phpunit: command not found during execution
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Since phing -f build.xml works separately, I was expected to get it working
in xinc as well.
Phing command /usr/local/bin/phing -logger phing.listener ... from log
works in shell.
I'm using
http://www.priebsch.de/2008/04/phpunit-test-and-code-coverage-statistics-with-phing/#content
approach in phing and succesfully tested it separately in phing.
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
# xinc-settings list-all
Section: xinc
version = 2.0.0b196
etc = /etc/xinc
etc_conf_d = /etc/xinc/conf.d
dir = /var/xinc
status_dir = /var/xinc/status
project_dir = /var/xinc/projects
www_dir = /var/www/xinc
www_port = 8080
www_ip = 192.168.1.101
log_dir = /var/log
tmp_dir = /tmp/xinc
Section: web
-No values-
Section: googleanalytics
-No values-
Section: phing
path = /usr/local/bin/phing
Section: phpunit
path = /usr/local/bin/phpunit
Section: php
path = /usr/local/bin/php
Last 2 sections were added to try resolve issue, but it didn't work.
Please provide any additional information below.
Log:
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] [build] eliza: Processing builders
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] Buildfile:
/var/xinc/projects/eliza/build.xml
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] Execution of target
"unittest" failed for the following reason:
/var/xinc/projects/eliza/build.xml:24:23: Unit tests failed
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow]
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] BUILD FAILED
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow]
/var/xinc/projects/eliza/build.xml:24:23: Unit tests failed
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] Total time: 0.1611 seconds
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow]
[error] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] Errors on command line:
[error] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] sh: phpunit: command not found
[error] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] [build] eliza: Phing command
/usr/local/bin/phing -logger phing.listener.NoBannerLogger -logfile
/var/xinc/projects/eliza/19b9c4c17b664748f6dcffb8550853d3.log -buildfile
/var/xinc/projects/eliza/build.xml -Dxinc.buildlabel="BUILD.271"
-Dprojectname="eliza" -Dcctimestamp="1249389133"
-Dxinc."project.name"="eliza" -Dxinc."build.number"="271"
-Dxinc."build.label"="BUILD.271" -Dxinc."workingdir"="/var/xinc/projects"
-Dxinc."statusdir"="/var/xinc/status"
-Dxinc."projectdir"="/var/xinc/projects"
-Dxinc."dir"="/var/xinc/projects/eliza"
-Dxinc."build.timestamp"="1249389133" -Dxinc."changeset"="ModificationSet
Previous Revision:
New Revision:
Change detected: yes
Added Resources: 0
Modified Resources: 0
Deleted Resources: 0
Conflict Resources: 0
Merged Resources: 0
" 2>&1 exited with status: 1
[error] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] [build] eliza: Build FAILED
[error] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] [build] eliza: BUILD FAILED
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Create phing build task (it executes and work from command line)
2. Add this build to xinc
3. Got sh: phpunit: command not found during execution
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Since phing -f build.xml works separately, I was expected to get it working
in xinc as well.
Phing command /usr/local/bin/phing -logger phing.listener ... from log
works in shell.
I'm using
http://www.priebsch.de/2008/04/phpunit-test-and-code-coverage-statistics-with-phing/#content
approach in phing and succesfully tested it separately in phing.
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
# xinc-settings list-all
Section: xinc
version = 2.0.0b196
etc = /etc/xinc
etc_conf_d = /etc/xinc/conf.d
dir = /var/xinc
status_dir = /var/xinc/status
project_dir = /var/xinc/projects
www_dir = /var/www/xinc
www_port = 8080
www_ip = 192.168.1.101
log_dir = /var/log
tmp_dir = /tmp/xinc
Section: web
-No values-
Section: googleanalytics
-No values-
Section: phing
path = /usr/local/bin/phing
Section: phpunit
path = /usr/local/bin/phpunit
Section: php
path = /usr/local/bin/php
Last 2 sections were added to try resolve issue, but it didn't work.
Please provide any additional information below.
Log:
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] [build] eliza: Processing builders
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] Buildfile:
/var/xinc/projects/eliza/build.xml
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] Execution of target
"unittest" failed for the following reason:
/var/xinc/projects/eliza/build.xml:24:23: Unit tests failed
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow]
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] BUILD FAILED
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow]
/var/xinc/projects/eliza/build.xml:24:23: Unit tests failed
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] Total time: 0.1611 seconds
[info] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow]
[error] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] Errors on command line:
[error] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] sh: phpunit: command not found
[error] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] [build] eliza: Phing command
/usr/local/bin/phing -logger phing.listener.NoBannerLogger -logfile
/var/xinc/projects/eliza/19b9c4c17b664748f6dcffb8550853d3.log -buildfile
/var/xinc/projects/eliza/build.xml -Dxinc.buildlabel="BUILD.271"
-Dprojectname="eliza" -Dcctimestamp="1249389133"
-Dxinc."project.name"="eliza" -Dxinc."build.number"="271"
-Dxinc."build.label"="BUILD.271" -Dxinc."workingdir"="/var/xinc/projects"
-Dxinc."statusdir"="/var/xinc/status"
-Dxinc."projectdir"="/var/xinc/projects"
-Dxinc."dir"="/var/xinc/projects/eliza"
-Dxinc."build.timestamp"="1249389133" -Dxinc."changeset"="ModificationSet
Previous Revision:
New Revision:
Change detected: yes
Added Resources: 0
Modified Resources: 0
Deleted Resources: 0
Conflict Resources: 0
Merged Resources: 0
" 2>&1 exited with status: 1
[error] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] [build] eliza: Build FAILED
[error] [2009-08-04 16:32:13-Europe/Moscow] [build] eliza: BUILD FAILED
Jul 30, 2009
Xinc_2_0_Release_Plan (Xinc 2.0 feature candidates and release plan.) Wiki page commented on by matti.t.jarvinen
- Is this project dead? This project has great potential.
Is this project dead? This project has great potential.
Jul 23, 2009
issue 203
(Svn modificationset and svn repository with SSL) reported by matti.t.jarvinen
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. modification set svn with ssl svn repository
2. No certificate for service user installed
3. Process hangs
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
winXP
Please provide any additional information below.
Fixed with after running
svn info --username xxx --password xxx https://repos/svn/trunk
by copying
C:\Documents and Settings\<current user>\Application Data\Subversion\auth
over
C:\Documents and Settings\LocalService\Application Data\Subversion\auth
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. modification set svn with ssl svn repository
2. No certificate for service user installed
3. Process hangs
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
winXP
Please provide any additional information below.
Fixed with after running
svn info --username xxx --password xxx https://repos/svn/trunk
by copying
C:\Documents and Settings\<current user>\Application Data\Subversion\auth
over
C:\Documents and Settings\LocalService\Application Data\Subversion\auth
Jul 22, 2009
issue 197
(Subversion checkout directory is not a working copy.) commented on by matti.t.jarvinen
- I fixed similar problem by upgrading svn binaries. Apparently tortoisesvn (used for
checkout) used more recent svn system than my commandline svn.
I fixed similar problem by upgrading svn binaries. Apparently tortoisesvn (used for
checkout) used more recent svn system than my commandline svn.
Jul 15, 2009
issue 202
(Xinc service won't start on Windows XP, XAMPP ) reported by swiec...@o2.pl
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Install Windows XP
2. Install XAMPP
3. Reinstall pear, cause xampp pear doesen't work.
4. Install xinc
5. Run post-install scripts
6. Add required include to httpd.conf
7. run "winserv start Xinc"
8. Check SCM - xinc is down
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
xinc is up
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
latest beta-release
Please provide any additional information below.
I tried different xinc configurations, diffrent ports and paths.
Winserv doesen't send any error messages.
Hope you guys give me some help...
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Install Windows XP
2. Install XAMPP
3. Reinstall pear, cause xampp pear doesen't work.
4. Install xinc
5. Run post-install scripts
6. Add required include to httpd.conf
7. run "winserv start Xinc"
8. Check SCM - xinc is down
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
xinc is up
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
latest beta-release
Please provide any additional information below.
I tried different xinc configurations, diffrent ports and paths.
Winserv doesen't send any error messages.
Hope you guys give me some help...
Jul 06, 2009
issue 201
(Cannot Install xinc) reported by JimInOC
- Currently using Ubuntu with all the required software. I tried to follow
the PEAR install instructions on the wiki however I'm getting failures:
plushj@kobe:~$ sudo /usr/local/php5/bin/pear channel-discover pear.xinc.eu
Adding Channel "pear.xinc.eu" succeeded
Discovery of channel "pear.xinc.eu" succeeded
plushj@kobe:~$ sudo /usr/local/php5/bin/pear channel-discover components.ez.no
Adding Channel "components.ez.no" succeeded
Discovery of channel "components.ez.no" succeeded
plushj@kobe:~$ sudo /usr/local/php5/bin/pear install xinc/Xinc
Failed to download xinc/Xinc within preferred state "stable", latest
release is version 2.0.0b196, stability "beta", use
"channel://pear.xinc.eu/Xinc-2.0.0b196" to install
Cannot initialize 'channel://pear.xinc.eu/Xinc', invalid or missing package
file
Package "channel://pear.xinc.eu/Xinc" is not valid
install failed
Currently using Ubuntu with all the required software. I tried to follow
the PEAR install instructions on the wiki however I'm getting failures:
plushj@kobe:~$ sudo /usr/local/php5/bin/pear channel-discover pear.xinc.eu
Adding Channel "pear.xinc.eu" succeeded
Discovery of channel "pear.xinc.eu" succeeded
plushj@kobe:~$ sudo /usr/local/php5/bin/pear channel-discover components.ez.no
Adding Channel "components.ez.no" succeeded
Discovery of channel "components.ez.no" succeeded
plushj@kobe:~$ sudo /usr/local/php5/bin/pear install xinc/Xinc
Failed to download xinc/Xinc within preferred state "stable", latest
release is version 2.0.0b196, stability "beta", use
"channel://pear.xinc.eu/Xinc-2.0.0b196" to install
Cannot initialize 'channel://pear.xinc.eu/Xinc', invalid or missing package
file
Package "channel://pear.xinc.eu/Xinc" is not valid
install failed
Jul 02, 2009
issue 200
(Is this project dead?) reported by JimInOC
- Haven't seen any activity since 08 on this.
Haven't seen any activity since 08 on this.
Jun 26, 2009
issue 199
(Only one phpunit xml file is published when using more than ...) reported by ramon.poca
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. In a project with several test tasks, each outputting to its own .xml
file
2. Create one phpUnitTestResults line for each phpunit .xml log file.
3. Execute a build
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
- Expected: One phpunit report for each suite
- Seen: Only the last phpunit report is generated
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Latest from xinc.eu
Please provide any additional information below.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. In a project with several test tasks, each outputting to its own .xml
file
2. Create one phpUnitTestResults line for each phpunit .xml log file.
3. Execute a build
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
- Expected: One phpunit report for each suite
- Seen: Only the last phpunit report is generated
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Latest from xinc.eu
Please provide any additional information below.
Jun 25, 2009
issue 198
(Failure on registering documentation (windows)) reported by bufferings
- Xinc 2.0.1.1
Xinc/Plugin/Repos/Documentation.php(L.130)
--
exec('xcopy /E /Y /I ' . str_replace(' ','\ ',$sourceFile) . '\*" "' .
$targetDir . '"', $out, $res1);
--
There is a double quotation after 'str_replace' though no double quotation
before.
So, I added a double quotation before, then it operated well.
--
exec('xcopy /E /Y /I "' . str_replace(' ','\ ',$sourceFile) . '\*" "' .
$targetDir . '"', $out, $res1);
--
I checked "branches/2.1.0" was also the same.
Xinc 2.0.1.1
Xinc/Plugin/Repos/Documentation.php(L.130)
--
exec('xcopy /E /Y /I ' . str_replace(' ','\ ',$sourceFile) . '\*" "' .
$targetDir . '"', $out, $res1);
--
There is a double quotation after 'str_replace' though no double quotation
before.
So, I added a double quotation before, then it operated well.
--
exec('xcopy /E /Y /I "' . str_replace(' ','\ ',$sourceFile) . '\*" "' .
$targetDir . '"', $out, $res1);
--
I checked "branches/2.1.0" was also the same.
Jun 15, 2009
issue 197
(Subversion checkout directory is not a working copy.) Status changed by apshoemaker
- Thank you for updating the ticket. I am going to go ahead and close as cannot
reproduce. Please file another ticket if the issue continues.
Thanks!
Paul
Status: WontFix
Thank you for updating the ticket. I am going to go ahead and close as cannot
reproduce. Please file another ticket if the issue continues.
Thanks!
Paul
Status: WontFix
Jun 14, 2009
issue 197
(Subversion checkout directory is not a working copy.) commented on by Thomaschaaf
- Got it fixed some how.. can't reproduce
Got it fixed some how.. can't reproduce
Jun 14, 2009
issue 197
(Subversion checkout directory is not a working copy.) reported by Thomaschaaf
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Successful
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Xinc version 2.0.0b196
Debian Lenny x64
Please provide any additional information below.
[error] [2009-06-14 20:47:09-System/Localtime] [build] kt_onedotfive: Phing command phing -verbose -logger phing.listener.NoBannerLogger -logfile
/var/xinc/projects/kt_onedotfive/source/3dfe75256d489d4eb59d9c5e08b42cc1.log -buildfile /var/xinc/projects/kt_onedotfive//build.xml build -
Dxinc.buildlabel="BUILD.4" -Dprojectname="kt_onedotfive" -Dcctimestamp="1245012428" -Dxinc."project.name"="kt_onedotfive" -Dxinc."build.number"="4" -
Dxinc."build.label"="BUILD.4" -Dxinc."workingdir"="/var/xinc/projects/kt_onedotfive" -Dxinc."statusdir"="/var/xinc/status/kt_onedotfive" -Dxinc."projectdir"=""
-Dxinc."dir"="/var/xinc/projects/kt_onedotfive/" -Dxinc."build.timestamp"="1245012428" -Dxinc."changeset"="ModificationSet
Previous Revision: 584
New Revision: 585
Change detected: yes
Added Resources: 0
Modified Resources: 1
Deleted Resources: 0
Conflict Resources: 0
Merged Resources: 0
" -Dxinc."svn.revision"="585" 2>&1 exited with status: 1
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Successful
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Xinc version 2.0.0b196
Debian Lenny x64
Please provide any additional information below.
[error] [2009-06-14 20:47:09-System/Localtime] [build] kt_onedotfive: Phing command phing -verbose -logger phing.listener.NoBannerLogger -logfile
/var/xinc/projects/kt_onedotfive/source/3dfe75256d489d4eb59d9c5e08b42cc1.log -buildfile /var/xinc/projects/kt_onedotfive//build.xml build -
Dxinc.buildlabel="BUILD.4" -Dprojectname="kt_onedotfive" -Dcctimestamp="1245012428" -Dxinc."project.name"="kt_onedotfive" -Dxinc."build.number"="4" -
Dxinc."build.label"="BUILD.4" -Dxinc."workingdir"="/var/xinc/projects/kt_onedotfive" -Dxinc."statusdir"="/var/xinc/status/kt_onedotfive" -Dxinc."projectdir"=""
-Dxinc."dir"="/var/xinc/projects/kt_onedotfive/" -Dxinc."build.timestamp"="1245012428" -Dxinc."changeset"="ModificationSet
Previous Revision: 584
New Revision: 585
Change detected: yes
Added Resources: 0
Modified Resources: 1
Deleted Resources: 0
Conflict Resources: 0
Merged Resources: 0
" -Dxinc."svn.revision"="585" 2>&1 exited with status: 1
Jun 01, 2009
issue 189
(PHPUnit tests, PHPDoc documentation, and Change Log don't sh...) commented on by arjun.anandsr
- tk
tk
May 25, 2009
issue 167
(Statistics graphs does not work) commented on by apshoemaker
- yes, please see comment 20 above.
display_errors is turned off early in the process, so it is not surprising that you
are not seeing anything. If you can please let me know if you find anything, I would
appreciate it as I cannot reproduce your issue.
yes, please see comment 20 above.
display_errors is turned off early in the process, so it is not surprising that you
are not seeing anything. If you can please let me know if you find anything, I would
appreciate it as I cannot reproduce your issue.
May 24, 2009
issue 167
(Statistics graphs does not work) commented on by eric.marden
- I found it, but was unable to get it working via the install.sh file. I think xinc is
running fine, but the Web Interface is blank and not throwing errors into any logs.
Can you say which files contain the fix for the graphs? I plan on reverting back to
2.0.0b196, but would like to apply the patches required to get the graphing working.
Which version is xinc.eu running? The graphs don't pull up there either.
I found it, but was unable to get it working via the install.sh file. I think xinc is
running fine, but the Web Interface is blank and not throwing errors into any logs.
Can you say which files contain the fix for the graphs? I plan on reverting back to
2.0.0b196, but would like to apply the patches required to get the graphing working.
Which version is xinc.eu running? The graphs don't pull up there either.
May 21, 2009
issue 167
(Statistics graphs does not work) commented on by apshoemaker
- I'm very sorry for the confusion. You will find the 2.0.3 branch in the subversion
repository. Click on the source tab at the top of the page and follow the
instructions there. Going forward the latest branch revision number will be the
latest unstable version of the code. The late stable version will be in the trunk
and released to the front page, as well.
I'm very sorry for the confusion. You will find the 2.0.3 branch in the subversion
repository. Click on the source tab at the top of the page and follow the
instructions there. Going forward the latest branch revision number will be the
latest unstable version of the code. The late stable version will be in the trunk
and released to the front page, as well.
May 21, 2009
issue 167
(Statistics graphs does not work) commented on by eric.marden
- @apshoemaker
Where does one obtain the 2.0.3 branch? I'm using the latest version (#ver2.0.0b196)
and see a 2.0.1.1 version (which seems to newer than mine? at least in numbering...).
If anything tell us which revision number it is so I can hunt for it on the source page.
Thanks!
@apshoemaker
Where does one obtain the 2.0.3 branch? I'm using the latest version (#ver2.0.0b196)
and see a 2.0.1.1 version (which seems to newer than mine? at least in numbering...).
If anything tell us which revision number it is so I can hunt for it on the source page.
Thanks!
