| Issue 19: | Simple mapping | |
| 1 person starred this issue and may be notified of changes. | Back to list |
Narrative: As a Developer I want to be able to specify that a property on the 'from' type is directly assigned to a corresponding property on the 'to' type So that I can test that these mappings are fulfilled Acceptance Criteria: Scenario 1: Properties exists on 'from' and 'to' Given that the corresponding property exists on the 'From' class And the corresponding property exists on the 'To' class When the Developer tries to add a simple mapping Then the test for 'AllPropertiesMapped' will not fail on this property Scenario 2: Property does not exist on one or both classes Given that the specified property does not exist on one of the classes When the Developer tries to add the mapping Then the addition should fail And the property name(s) that did not exist should be shown Scenario 3: Property already mapped to another property Given that the specified property exists And the property already has a mapping When the Developer tries to add a simple mapping Then the addition should succeed And the mapping should be available for testing (One property could be mapped to multiple outcomes) Scenario 4: Property mapping already exists Given that the specified property exists And the property already has a mapping with the same 'from' and 'to' properties When the Developer tries to add a simple mapping Then the addition should fail And the reason for the failure should be shown |
|
,
Oct 19, 2008
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Status: Started
|
|
,
Oct 22, 2008
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Status: Fixed
|
|
,
Nov 15, 2008
Further scenarios: Scenario 5: Primitive properties exist with implicit conversion on 'from' and 'to' Given that the corresponding property exists on the 'From' and 'To' classes And both properties are of primitive type And an implicit coversion exists When the Developer tries to add a simple mapping Then an exception will be thrown Scenario 6: Primitive properties exist with explicit conversion on 'from' and 'to' Given that the corresponding property exists on the 'From' and 'To' classes And both properties are of primitive type And an explicit coversion exists When the Developer tries to add a simple mapping Then an exception will be thrown Scenario 7: properties exist with explicit conversion on 'from' and 'to' Given that the corresponding property exists on the 'From' and 'To' classes And an explicit cast operator exists for the conversion When the Developer tries to add a simple mapping Then an exception will be thrown Scenario 8: properties exist with implicit conversion on 'from' and 'to' Given that the corresponding property exists on the 'From' and 'To' classes And an implicit cast operator exists for the conversion When the Developer tries to add a simple mapping Then an exception will be thrown Note: These scenarios 5-8 have the expected outcome of an exception, in the future this may change |
|
 Sign in to add a comment
|
