Comments Wiki page commented on by bernhardverkade
- nice framework! I agree with the typo, I think this should be sorted very quickly to maintain potenial in this framework. Keep up the good work!
nice framework! I agree with the typo, I think this should be sorted very quickly to maintain potenial in this framework. Keep up the good work!
Aug 23, 2009
Comments Wiki page commented on by bernhardverkade
- nice framework! I agree with the typo, I think this should be sorted very quickly to maintain potenial in this framework. Keep up the good work!
nice framework! I agree with the typo, I think this should be sorted very quickly to maintain potenial in this framework. Keep up the good work!
Aug 20, 2009
Tutorial Wiki page commented on by dhanrajj30
- Very Nice Grid css system
Dhanraj jat web master
Very Nice Grid css system
Dhanraj jat web master
Aug 12, 2009
Comments Wiki page commented on by antonio.vong
- Still haven't updated the typo??? strong { ont-weight: bold; }
Still haven't updated the typo??? strong { ont-weight: bold; }
Aug 12, 2009
Tutorial Wiki page commented on by vladocar
- @donnelly-house.net: It is very simple:
For 970px image you do: <div><img src="image.jpg" /> </div>. The .main class is 970px so everything inside will perfectly fit 970px.
@donnelly-house.net: It is very simple:
For 970px image you do: <div><img src="image.jpg" /> </div>. The .main class is 970px so everything inside will perfectly fit 970px.
issue 2
(CSS definition of strong lacks a 'f') commented on by lavoillo
- That is not relevant to this issue (strong css definition lacks an 'f'), please post
this as a new issue.
That is not relevant to this issue (strong css definition lacks an 'f'), please post
this as a new issue.
issue 2
(CSS definition of strong lacks a 'f') commented on by lavoillo
- Err...
ont-weight of course --'
Err...
ont-weight of course --'
Mar 27, 2009
issue 2
(CSS definition of strong lacks a 'f') reported by lavoillo
- typography.css has a:
strong { ont-family: bold }
Can be 'ustrating :)
typography.css has a:
strong { ont-family: bold }
Can be 'ustrating :)
Feb 17, 2009
issue 1
(SVN appears not to have files in it) reported by mr.patfarrell
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. try to use the commnadline svn read-only checkout
2. nothing's in the svn trunk
3. ???
4. no profit ;)
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
files would be present in svn source tree
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. try to use the commnadline svn read-only checkout
2. nothing's in the svn trunk
3. ???
4. no profit ;)
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
files would be present in svn source tree