New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add text box for definition comment #32
Comments
Comment #1 originally posted by hdietze on 2013-11-18T22:20:00.000Z: All templates in the GO instance of TermGenie have now a new input field called 'Public Comment'. The content will be added as an comment stanza to the term. Additional there is a hint that the content of this field is visible to everyone. |
Comment #2 originally posted by hdietze on 2013-11-19T15:23:15.000Z: Thanks Heiko. Could you please do the following:
I know it's a bit long but hopefully it can fit! Thanks, |
Comment #3 originally posted by hdietze on 2013-11-19T21:59:23.000Z: Made some changes. (# 0) is not so easy, would require a deeper change. Added it to the hint. I have shortened the description text for # 2. # 1 done. |
Comment #4 originally posted by hdietze on 2013-11-20T07:46:12.000Z: Thanks Heiko! For no.0, we could solve it by changing All rest looks good. |
Comment #5 originally posted by hdietze on 2013-11-21T21:23:48.000Z: The field is now called "Optional: public definition comment" |
Original issue 32 created by hdietze on 2013-11-14T20:34:10.000Z:
Hi,
As discussed at today's editors call
(http://wiki.geneontology.org/index.php/Ontology_meeting_2013-11-14#TG_feature_requests, point 2)
could you please add a text box in both the TG template and the TG free form, so curators can leave notes for themselves. This would appear as a definition comment in the ontology. On top of the text box, we should indicate that the comment will be made public, and request that the comment is entered in the following format:
"An example of this is [name of gene product, such as LysZ] in [species name] [then add UniProt symbol here] in PMID:xxx. [add evidence code here]"
TG reviewers will simply have to strip off the evidence code.
Thanks,
Paola
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: