|
|
SWFObject_2_0_documentation
Embedding Adobe Flash Player content using SWFObject 2.0
This page has moved to: http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/documentation
Sign in to add a comment
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
Search
|
|
|
This page has moved to: http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/documentation
Sign in to add a comment
I'v translated this doc to Chinese at http://farthinker.cn/2007/12/27/swfobject-2_0-doc-translation/. I hope it is of help : ) Thank you for your great work on SWFObject. Best regards.
A Japanese translation by Shuhei Terai can be found at http://mtl.recruit.co.jp/blog/2007/10/swfobject_v20.html
An Italian translation by Luka M. can be found at http://www.magnificaweb.it/swfobject-2/
Here's the German translation by Powerflasher: http://blog.powerflasher.de/swfobject2/
The following libraries have confirmed to be SWFObject 2.0 compatible:
SWFAddress 2.0 for deeplinking: http://www.asual.com/swfaddress/
AS3.0 MouseWheel? on Mac OS X: http://blog.pixelbreaker.com/flash/as30-mousewheel-on-mac-os-x/
swffit for Flash resizing: http://swffit.millermedeiros.com/
At the migration tips from SWFObject 1.5 you write that "It is now preferred to insert all script blocks in the head of your HTML page". Is this absolutely necessary or just a recommendation? In other words: Do I have to expect any shortcomings if I put the script just below (or above?) the HTML parts?
Inserting all script blocks in the head of your HTML page is a recommendation. Adding your scripts in the body of your page may have visual impact (e.g. flashes of replaced alternative content), because your JavaScript? code will be executed later. All depends on your implementation, really.
A swedish translation by Seoserver can be found at http://www.seoserver.se/labb/flash/swfobject/