My favorites | Sign in
Logo
          
New issue | Search
for
| Advanced search | Search tips
Issue 15: Examples should make more accurate use of peg/working revisions
  Back to list
Status:  New
Owner:  cmpilato
Type-Defect
Priority-High
Milestone-en-1.6


Sign in to add a comment
 
Reported by cmpilato, Dec 01, 2008
The book began its life before the invention of the peg revision, and well
before the day when the peg revision syntax grew to full obedience by the
'svn' subcommands.  As such, the book continues to mostly use -r where @ is
the more semantically accurate syntax.  This is a contributing factor for
user confusion, and needs to be remedied.
Comment 1 by cmpilato, Dec 01, 2008
Here's a relevant mailing list discussion:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2008-11/0962.shtml
Comment 2 by cmpilato, Dec 17, 2008
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: Milestone-en-1.6
Sign in to add a comment

Hosted by Google Code