issue 3398
(Unable to run sample code "SampleApp") Status changed by jacobly@google.com
- This issue tracker is for issues with Google Code Project Hosting itself. You should file
your bug at the Orkut api issue tracker: http://code.google.com/p/orkut-os-
client/issues/list
Status: Invalid
This issue tracker is for issues with Google Code Project Hosting itself. You should file
your bug at the Orkut api issue tracker: http://code.google.com/p/orkut-os-
client/issues/list
issue 3400
(Mixed content warnings when working over TLS) changed by ningerso
- This is a bigger deal with IE because it will actually generate popup dialogs on a regular basis with mixed
content. Most of the mixed content issues had been addressed before we enabled SSL, but it looks like a few
references slipped through. Specifically, I notice the kibbles JS file is being retrieved as http-only, also there is a
cleardot.gif too.
Status: Accepted
Owner: ningerso
Labels: UsabilitySecurity
This is a bigger deal with IE because it will actually generate popup dialogs on a regular basis with mixed
content. Most of the mixed content issues had been addressed before we enabled SSL, but it looks like a few
references slipped through. Specifically, I notice the kibbles JS file is being retrieved as http-only, also there is a
cleardot.gif too.
Status: Accepted
Owner: ningerso
Labels: UsabilitySecurity
3 hours ago
issue 3399
(Secure downloads when working over TLS (aka SSL)) changed by ningerso
-
issue 3400
(Mixed content warnings when working over TLS) commented on by suss...@google.com
- Just playing devil's advocate here: why is this a problem? Why is perfect SSL security/secrecy necessary when
dealing with a website where 100% of the content is already world-readable?
Not saying this shouldn't be fixed, but I'm curious why this worries you at the moment.
Just playing devil's advocate here: why is this a problem? Why is perfect SSL security/secrecy necessary when
dealing with a website where 100% of the content is already world-readable?
Not saying this shouldn't be fixed, but I'm curious why this worries you at the moment.
9 hours ago
issue 3400
(Mixed content warnings when working over TLS) reported by alexkon
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
Work with Code Hosting over HTTPS with the mixed content warning enabled.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Firefox complains about mixed content often. This happens on different
pages. Mixed content warnings mean that a page loaded over a secure channel
includes some content (such as JavaScript) loaded over an insecure channel,
which makes the original page insecure.
Expected to see no mixed content warnings.
What browser (or hg/svn client) are you using? On what operating system?
Firefox 3.0.15 on Ubuntu 8.04.
Please provide any additional information below.
You might have the warnings disabled in your Firefox settings. By default
they are enabled, which is also useful for security when the user is
somewhat educated. You can re-enable the mixed content warning at
Preferences->Security->Warning Messages Settings-> I'm about to view an
encrypted page that contains some unencrypted information. The
corresponding about:config options are:
security.warn_viewing_mixed = true
security.warn_viewing_mixed.show_once = false
If you do not see how this subverts much of the security provided by HTTPS,
I can try to explain that better. If you need more specific information to
fix this, I might be able to provide it.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
Work with Code Hosting over HTTPS with the mixed content warning enabled.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Firefox complains about mixed content often. This happens on different
pages. Mixed content warnings mean that a page loaded over a secure channel
includes some content (such as JavaScript) loaded over an insecure channel,
which makes the original page insecure.
Expected to see no mixed content warnings.
What browser (or hg/svn client) are you using? On what operating system?
Firefox 3.0.15 on Ubuntu 8.04.
Please provide any additional information below.
You might have the warnings disabled in your Firefox settings. By default
they are enabled, which is also useful for security when the user is
somewhat educated. You can re-enable the mixed content warning at
Preferences->Security->Warning Messages Settings-> I'm about to view an
encrypted page that contains some unencrypted information. The
corresponding about:config options are:
security.warn_viewing_mixed = true
security.warn_viewing_mixed.show_once = false
If you do not see how this subverts much of the security provided by HTTPS,
I can try to explain that better. If you need more specific information to
fix this, I might be able to provide it.
issue 3398
(Unable to run sample code "SampleApp") reported by gurpalsingh123
-
I am using Orkut client api package at the following location
http://code.google.com/p/orkut-os-client/source/browse/?r=888e7644f8b731caa29031a289cf8f71efc85645#hg%3Fstate%3Dclosed
in my application.
i have created the Java Project and When i am trying to run SampleApp
i am able to get signin page and register but it registers with
localhost:1825 as application name
example provided with the library I am getting error - 403.
Below is what i am getting as a result i.e. request sent and the
response returned.
#############################################################################
Request:[{"params":{"groupId":"@self","userId":"@me"},"id":"0-p.g","method":"people.get"}]
Response:[{"id":"0-p.g","error":{"message":"forbidden: Get profile
permission denied.","data":{"errorType":"noPermissions"},"code":403}}]
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.google.orkut.client.sample.SampleApp.run(SampleApp.java:41)
at com.google.orkut.client.sample.SampleApp.main(SampleApp.java:24)
#############################################################################
The "TestOrkutAuth" Sample code passed the test and printed
"Authentication Passed" successfully.
I am using "Anonymous" for the consumerKey and consumerSecret in the
oauth.properties file.
******** Contents of Oauth.properties Initial File **************
# enter the consumer key and secret here
consumerKey=anonymous
consumerSecret=anonymous
accessUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthGetAccessToken
authorizationUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthAuthorizeToken
requestUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthGetRequestToken
saveAccessToken=true
scope=http\://sandbox.orkut.gmodules.com/social/rpc
serverUrl=http\://sandbox.orkut.com/social/rpc
access token is written in the file but the profile information is not
returned for that user instead above mentioned response is returned.
******** Contents of Oauth.properties AFTER RUN File **************
#writing access Token
#Thu Dec 10 11:33:21 IST 2009
accessUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthGetAccessToken
consumerSecret=anonymous
serverUrl=http\://sandbox.orkut.com/social/rpc
token_secret=IVyKhHegmGNVEh5iZTPftLYc
requestUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthGetRequestToken
accessToken=1/v9fEWUOh8VLjjd46uL7AiGATiaQZnWPB51nTvo8n9Sw
saveAccessToken=true
consumerKey=anonymous
authorizationUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthAuthorizeToken
scope=http\://sandbox.orkut.gmodules.com/social/rpc
#########################################################################
Could you please check or identify where the problem is , because your
are creators of it . By any means your are the onlybest possible
persons to help us.
i am stuck on this particular issue
will be really greatful if you can give it precious time of your and help
me out
I am using Orkut client api package at the following location
http://code.google.com/p/orkut-os-client/source/browse/?r=888e7644f8b731caa29031a289cf8f71efc85645#hg%3Fstate%3Dclosed
in my application.
i have created the Java Project and When i am trying to run SampleApp
i am able to get signin page and register but it registers with
localhost:1825 as application name
example provided with the library I am getting error - 403.
Below is what i am getting as a result i.e. request sent and the
response returned.
#############################################################################
Request:[{"params":{"groupId":"@self","userId":"@me"},"id":"0-p.g","method":"people.get"}]
Response:[{"id":"0-p.g","error":{"message":"forbidden: Get profile
permission denied.","data":{"errorType":"noPermissions"},"code":403}}]
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.google.orkut.client.sample.SampleApp.run(SampleApp.java:41)
at com.google.orkut.client.sample.SampleApp.main(SampleApp.java:24)
#############################################################################
The "TestOrkutAuth" Sample code passed the test and printed
"Authentication Passed" successfully.
I am using "Anonymous" for the consumerKey and consumerSecret in the
oauth.properties file.
******** Contents of Oauth.properties Initial File **************
# enter the consumer key and secret here
consumerKey=anonymous
consumerSecret=anonymous
accessUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthGetAccessToken
authorizationUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthAuthorizeToken
requestUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthGetRequestToken
saveAccessToken=true
scope=http\://sandbox.orkut.gmodules.com/social/rpc
serverUrl=http\://sandbox.orkut.com/social/rpc
access token is written in the file but the profile information is not
returned for that user instead above mentioned response is returned.
******** Contents of Oauth.properties AFTER RUN File **************
#writing access Token
#Thu Dec 10 11:33:21 IST 2009
accessUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthGetAccessToken
consumerSecret=anonymous
serverUrl=http\://sandbox.orkut.com/social/rpc
token_secret=IVyKhHegmGNVEh5iZTPftLYc
requestUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthGetRequestToken
accessToken=1/v9fEWUOh8VLjjd46uL7AiGATiaQZnWPB51nTvo8n9Sw
saveAccessToken=true
consumerKey=anonymous
authorizationUrl=https\://www.google.com/accounts/OAuthAuthorizeToken
scope=http\://sandbox.orkut.gmodules.com/social/rpc
#########################################################################
Could you please check or identify where the problem is , because your
are creators of it . By any means your are the onlybest possible
persons to help us.
i am stuck on this particular issue
will be really greatful if you can give it precious time of your and help
me out
15 hours ago
issue 3397
(精简版本的小店铺程序) commented on by apa...@google.com
- Are you requesting private hosting for small companies?
Are you requesting private hosting for small companies?
issue 3397
(精简版本的小店铺程序) reported by shubaoqi...@gmail.com
- What new or enhanced feature are you proposing?
使用php开发的十分精简的项目
What goal would this enhancement help you achieve?
用最简单的语句时间最全面的功能，前提是小
What new or enhanced feature are you proposing?
使用php开发的十分精简的项目
What goal would this enhancement help you achieve?
用最简单的语句时间最全面的功能，前提是小
issue 3396
(Wiki renderer inserts <blockquote> tags around indented <tr>...) commented on by dtrebbien
- Would you please change this issue to an Enhancement Request? It is very difficult
to read table HTML if it is not indented.
Would you please change this issue to an Enhancement Request? It is very difficult
to read table HTML if it is not indented.
22 hours ago
issue 3396
(Wiki renderer inserts <blockquote> tags around indented <tr>...) Status changed by ningerso
- The two space indent is wiki markup for the block quote, so you are mixing HTML syntax with wiki syntax. While
not ideal, the mixed use we allow dictates this behavior. Removing the indentation should allow you to work
around the problem.
Status: WontFix
The two space indent is wiki markup for the block quote, so you are mixing HTML syntax with wiki syntax. While
not ideal, the mixed use we allow dictates this behavior. Removing the indentation should allow you to work
around the problem.
Status: WontFix
23 hours ago
issue 3396
(Wiki renderer inserts <blockquote> tags around indented <tr>...) reported by dtrebbien
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Edit a wiki page
2. Add table HTML (`table`, `tr`, `td`) where the `tr` tags are indented
two spaces, and the `td` tags are indented four spaces. Example:
<table>
<tr>
<td>test</td>
</tr>
</table>
3. Click `Save page`.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I expect that the renderer would emit the table HTML virtually unchanged.
Instead, I see `blockquote` tags that are wrapping the contents of the
indented `tr` tags, and the indented contents. For the example above, the
renderer outputs:
<table> <blockquote><tr>
<blockquote><td>test</td>
</blockquote></tr>
</blockquote></table>
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Edit a wiki page
2. Add table HTML (`table`, `tr`, `td`) where the `tr` tags are indented
two spaces, and the `td` tags are indented four spaces. Example:
<table>
<tr>
<td>test</td>
</tr>
</table>
3. Click `Save page`.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I expect that the renderer would emit the table HTML virtually unchanged.
Instead, I see `blockquote` tags that are wrapping the contents of the
indented `tr` tags, and the indented contents. For the example above, the
renderer outputs:
<table> <blockquote><tr>
<blockquote><td>test</td>
</blockquote></tr>
</blockquote></table>
23 hours ago
issue 3312
(Google's SSL certificate keeps changing) commented on by jeffreymcmanus
- Got a little bit of this over the past 3-4 days, I'm a Versions user on OSX 10.6.
Here's a traceroute from just now:
traceroute tinypug.googlecode.com
traceroute to googlecode.l.google.com (72.14.213.82), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 69-12-144-1.dsl.static.sonic.net (69.12.144.1) 28.454 ms 36.333 ms 23.397 ms
2 105.at-2-2-0.gw3.200p-sf.sonic.net (69.12.242.25) 21.047 ms 45.071 ms 53.316 ms
3 200.ge-0-1-0.gw.equinix-sj.sonic.net (64.142.0.210) 35.997 ms 45.695 ms 45.726 ms
4 0.as0.gw2.equinix-sj.sonic.net (64.142.0.150) 190.904 ms 107.583 ms 46.667 ms
5 eqixsj-google-gige.google.com (206.223.116.21) 27.120 ms 22.515 ms 34.391 ms
6 216.239.49.168 (216.239.49.168) 25.796 ms 49.113 ms
216.239.49.170 (216.239.49.170) 52.324 ms
7 216.239.49.198 (216.239.49.198) 65.991 ms 41.265 ms 40.913 ms
8 209.85.250.144 (209.85.250.144) 51.932 ms 44.315 ms
216.239.48.34 (216.239.48.34) 43.127 ms
9 216.239.48.143 (216.239.48.143) 44.953 ms
64.233.174.125 (64.233.174.125) 42.506 ms 43.312 ms
10 209.85.253.14 (209.85.253.14) 52.210 ms
209.85.253.2 (209.85.253.2) 44.420 ms
209.85.253.10 (209.85.253.10) 106.916 ms
11 pv-in-f82.1e100.net (72.14.213.82) 47.346 ms 42.938 ms 50.803 ms
Got a little bit of this over the past 3-4 days, I'm a Versions user on OSX 10.6.
Here's a traceroute from just now:
traceroute tinypug.googlecode.com
traceroute to googlecode.l.google.com (72.14.213.82), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 69-12-144-1.dsl.static.sonic.net (69.12.144.1) 28.454 ms 36.333 ms 23.397 ms
2 105.at-2-2-0.gw3.200p-sf.sonic.net (69.12.242.25) 21.047 ms 45.071 ms 53.316 ms
3 200.ge-0-1-0.gw.equinix-sj.sonic.net (64.142.0.210) 35.997 ms 45.695 ms 45.726 ms
4 0.as0.gw2.equinix-sj.sonic.net (64.142.0.150) 190.904 ms 107.583 ms 46.667 ms
5 eqixsj-google-gige.google.com (206.223.116.21) 27.120 ms 22.515 ms 34.391 ms
6 216.239.49.168 (216.239.49.168) 25.796 ms 49.113 ms
216.239.49.170 (216.239.49.170) 52.324 ms
7 216.239.49.198 (216.239.49.198) 65.991 ms 41.265 ms 40.913 ms
8 209.85.250.144 (209.85.250.144) 51.932 ms 44.315 ms
216.239.48.34 (216.239.48.34) 43.127 ms
9 216.239.48.143 (216.239.48.143) 44.953 ms
64.233.174.125 (64.233.174.125) 42.506 ms 43.312 ms
10 209.85.253.14 (209.85.253.14) 52.210 ms
209.85.253.2 (209.85.253.2) 44.420 ms
209.85.253.10 (209.85.253.10) 106.916 ms
11 pv-in-f82.1e100.net (72.14.213.82) 47.346 ms 42.938 ms 50.803 ms
issue 3395
(VC quota increase) reported by hotsho111
- Project name: fireinferno
Requested new quota: 3gb
Reason: Need more space for files
Project name: fireinferno
Requested new quota: 3gb
Reason: Need more space for files
24 hours ago
issue 3312
(Google's SSL certificate keeps changing) commented on by skawtus
- Experiencing same problem with osx command line client:
svn --version
svn, version 1.4.4 (r25188)
compiled Sep 23 2007, 22:32:34
Experiencing same problem with osx command line client:
svn --version
svn, version 1.4.4 (r25188)
compiled Sep 23 2007, 22:32:34
24 hours ago
issue 3386
(Commit emails no longer coming from unladen-swallow@googleco...) commented on by collinw
- I just noticed that this impacts issue tracker update emails as well, in addition to commit messages.
I just noticed that this impacts issue tracker update emails as well, in addition to commit messages.
issue 3394
(VC quota increase) reported by Aldgazar
- Project name: fireinferno
Requested new quota:
Reason: Ran out of space for school project, sounds files take up a lot of
space
Project name: fireinferno
Requested new quota:
Reason: Ran out of space for school project, sounds files take up a lot of
space
29 hours ago
issue 3393
(Reset repository) Status changed by suss...@google.com
- You can reset it yourself, at the bottom of your 'Source' page.
Status: WontFix
You can reset it yourself, at the bottom of your 'Source' page.
Status: WontFix
31 hours ago
issue 3379
(Downloads counter seems to be broken) commented on by givan101
- уже починили =)
уже починили =)
31 hours ago
issue 3393
(Reset repository) reported by karlroos93
- Please reset repository in http://code.google.com/p/solidcos/
The project has taken a whole different direction now and I want to keep the name.
Thanks in advance
Please reset repository in http://code.google.com/p/solidcos/
The project has taken a whole different direction now and I want to keep the name.
Thanks in advance
36 hours ago
issue 3389
(The issue status edit field should look like a dropdown even...) commented on by djc.ocht...@gmail.com
- I still think there should be some kind of hint that it's not *just* a text field.
I still think there should be some kind of hint that it's not *just* a text field.
36 hours ago
issue 3358
(Cannot search for a reporter without explicitly specifying i...) commented on by tech@frontrowcomputer.com
- Oh, duh. Sorry, apa. I was referring to the address right after the comment number,
and I'll bet you were referring to any mention of the address in the body of the
comment. So I assume the problem still exists if the body doesn't contain the
"reporter's" name.
Oh, duh. Sorry, apa. I was referring to the address right after the comment number,
and I'll bet you were referring to any mention of the address in the body of the
comment. So I assume the problem still exists if the body doesn't contain the
"reporter's" name.
37 hours ago
issue 3379
(Downloads counter seems to be broken) commented on by debayanin
- Works for me too. Thanks :)
Works for me too. Thanks :)
40 hours ago
issue 3392
(Advanced project search) reported by dtoffe
- A handful of search options to refine searching for projects, for example:
Sort by Creation Date, Sort by Last Commit, Sort by Activity, etc.
This would help discovering interesting projects related to some technology
or topic, for example, find the newest projects using the Wicket framework,
or find the most active projects dealing with JDBC.
A handful of search options to refine searching for projects, for example:
Sort by Creation Date, Sort by Last Commit, Sort by Activity, etc.
This would help discovering interesting projects related to some technology
or topic, for example, find the newest projects using the Wicket framework,
or find the most active projects dealing with JDBC.
40 hours ago
issue 3312
(Google's SSL certificate keeps changing) commented on by jared.thomas.henderson
- Also experiencing this issue again, using Versions svn client.
Also experiencing this issue again, using Versions svn client.
issue 3391
(Add support for Rietveld) reported by kdlu...@google.com
- What new or enhanced feature are you proposing?
Allow project to use Rietveld for code reviews, by simply selecting a radio
box within their project.
What goal would this enhancement help you achieve?
This would give projects the ability to conduct code reviews *before* the
code was submitted.
What new or enhanced feature are you proposing?
Allow project to use Rietveld for code reviews, by simply selecting a radio
box within their project.
What goal would this enhancement help you achieve?
This would give projects the ability to conduct code reviews *before* the
code was submitted.
issue 3389
(The issue status edit field should look like a dropdown even...) Status changed by jrobbins
- Actually, it is a text field. You can enter other text that is not offered in the
auto-complete menu. E.g., sometimes you have an issue that is a special case and you
want to set a status string that describes that.
Status: WontFix
Actually, it is a text field. You can enter other text that is not offered in the
auto-complete menu. E.g., sometimes you have an issue that is a special case and you
want to set a status string that describes that.
Status: WontFix
43 hours ago
issue 3312
(Google's SSL certificate keeps changing) commented on by d...@madebysofa.com
- This just started happening again for me too, just got two certificate request dialogs in Versions (indicating a
different certificate is being used than before), for the Google-signed cert. when I got home from work and
woke my laptop from sleep. Five minutes later I got another two requests for accepting the Google-signed
cert.
Apparently, at work I'm (seemingly) consistently getting one particular certificate, and at home I'm alternating
between getting the one signed by "Google Internet Authority" and the one signed by "Thawte Premium Server
CA".
below is the traceroute from home (just after I got the dialog to confirm accepting the Google-signed cert):
traceroute to googlecode.l.google.com (74.125.77.82), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1) 1.285 ms 1.150 ms 0.992 ms
2 10.15.189.1 (10.15.189.1) 10.133 ms 12.069 ms 9.607 ms
3 p1001.net.upc.nl (212.142.1.1) 21.840 ms 10.166 ms 10.009 ms
4 84-116-131-17.aorta.net (84.116.131.17) 14.435 ms 12.085 ms 10.149 ms
5 72.14.218.61 (72.14.218.61) 36.301 ms 12.787 ms 12.483 ms
6 209.85.248.93 (209.85.248.93) 11.211 ms
209.85.248.88 (209.85.248.88) 11.664 ms 9.959 ms
7 64.233.175.246 (64.233.175.246) 13.776 ms 16.611 ms 14.213 ms
8 209.85.255.166 (209.85.255.166) 14.787 ms 14.784 ms
209.85.255.143 (209.85.255.143) 16.088 ms
9 209.85.255.102 (209.85.255.102) 17.699 ms
209.85.255.98 (209.85.255.98) 27.423 ms
209.85.255.106 (209.85.255.106) 20.384 ms
10 ew-in-f82.1e100.net (74.125.77.82) 16.220 ms 18.826 ms 15.367 ms
outside IP address at home: 77.251.205.183
another traceroute just after I was asked to accept the Thawte-signed one:
traceroute to googlecode.l.google.com (74.125.79.82), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1) 2.651 ms 1.064 ms 1.118 ms
2 10.15.189.1 (10.15.189.1) 11.364 ms 9.655 ms 7.520 ms
3 p1001.net.upc.nl (212.142.1.1) 11.786 ms 9.848 ms 10.463 ms
4 84-116-131-17.aorta.net (84.116.131.17) 17.441 ms 11.367 ms 13.954 ms
5 72.14.218.61 (72.14.218.61) 14.712 ms 14.221 ms 11.319 ms
6 209.85.248.88 (209.85.248.88) 11.474 ms
209.85.248.93 (209.85.248.93) 91.022 ms
209.85.248.88 (209.85.248.88) 11.917 ms
7 64.233.175.246 (64.233.175.246) 17.075 ms
72.14.233.114 (72.14.233.114) 18.974 ms 19.183 ms
8 209.85.255.166 (209.85.255.166) 19.775 ms 18.674 ms
72.14.239.199 (72.14.239.199) 36.029 ms
9 209.85.255.130 (209.85.255.130) 32.833 ms
209.85.255.118 (209.85.255.118) 25.606 ms
209.85.255.126 (209.85.255.126) 20.876 ms
10 ey-in-f82.1e100.net (74.125.79.82) 17.919 ms 21.363 ms 21.390 ms
outside IP address was still the same.
I'll add another comment to this ticket tomorrow if I find I'm not getting alternating certificates anymore when
I'm at work again tomorrow.
The most likely reason that these regressions are being reported by Versions users is that Versions polls the
repository for changes frequently while the app is running, exposing Versions users to a potential issue with
the certificates every couple of minutes or so.
Do let me know if you need more information, as one of Versions' developers I'm willing to help any way I can
to help resolve this issue.
This just started happening again for me too, just got two certificate request dialogs in Versions (indicating a
different certificate is being used than before), for the Google-signed cert. when I got home from work and
woke my laptop from sleep. Five minutes later I got another two requests for accepting the Google-signed
cert.
Apparently, at work I'm (seemingly) consistently getting one particular certificate, and at home I'm alternating
between getting the one signed by "Google Internet Authority" and the one signed by "Thawte Premium Server
CA".
below is the traceroute from home (just after I got the dialog to confirm accepting the Google-signed cert):
traceroute to googlecode.l.google.com (74.125.77.82), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1) 1.285 ms 1.150 ms 0.992 ms
2 10.15.189.1 (10.15.189.1) 10.133 ms 12.069 ms 9.607 ms
3 p1001.net.upc.nl (212.142.1.1) 21.840 ms 10.166 ms 10.009 ms
4 84-116-131-17.aorta.net (84.116.131.17) 14.435 ms 12.085 ms 10.149 ms
5 72.14.218.61 (72.14.218.61) 36.301 ms 12.787 ms 12.483 ms
6 209.85.248.93 (209.85.248.93) 11.211 ms
209.85.248.88 (209.85.248.88) 11.664 ms 9.959 ms
7 64.233.175.246 (64.233.175.246) 13.776 ms 16.611 ms 14.213 ms
8 209.85.255.166 (209.85.255.166) 14.787 ms 14.784 ms
209.85.255.143 (209.85.255.143) 16.088 ms
9 209.85.255.102 (209.85.255.102) 17.699 ms
209.85.255.98 (209.85.255.98) 27.423 ms
209.85.255.106 (209.85.255.106) 20.384 ms
10 ew-in-f82.1e100.net (74.125.77.82) 16.220 ms 18.826 ms 15.367 ms
outside IP address at home: 77.251.205.183
another traceroute just after I was asked to accept the Thawte-signed one:
traceroute to googlecode.l.google.com (74.125.79.82), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1) 2.651 ms 1.064 ms 1.118 ms
2 10.15.189.1 (10.15.189.1) 11.364 ms 9.655 ms 7.520 ms
3 p1001.net.upc.nl (212.142.1.1) 11.786 ms 9.848 ms 10.463 ms
4 84-116-131-17.aorta.net (84.116.131.17) 17.441 ms 11.367 ms 13.954 ms
5 72.14.218.61 (72.14.218.61) 14.712 ms 14.221 ms 11.319 ms
6 209.85.248.88 (209.85.248.88) 11.474 ms
209.85.248.93 (209.85.248.93) 91.022 ms
209.85.248.88 (209.85.248.88) 11.917 ms
7 64.233.175.246 (64.233.175.246) 17.075 ms
72.14.233.114 (72.14.233.114) 18.974 ms 19.183 ms
8 209.85.255.166 (209.85.255.166) 19.775 ms 18.674 ms
72.14.239.199 (72.14.239.199) 36.029 ms
9 209.85.255.130 (209.85.255.130) 32.833 ms
209.85.255.118 (209.85.255.118) 25.606 ms
209.85.255.126 (209.85.255.126) 20.876 ms
10 ey-in-f82.1e100.net (74.125.79.82) 17.919 ms 21.363 ms 21.390 ms
outside IP address was still the same.
I'll add another comment to this ticket tomorrow if I find I'm not getting alternating certificates anymore when
I'm at work again tomorrow.
The most likely reason that these regressions are being reported by Versions users is that Versions polls the
repository for changes frequently while the app is running, exposing Versions users to a potential issue with
the certificates every couple of minutes or so.
Do let me know if you need more information, as one of Versions' developers I'm willing to help any way I can
to help resolve this issue.
43 hours ago
issue 3379
(Downloads counter seems to be broken) commented on by python.bitstring
- Thanks, it appears to be working fine for me now - first counter increase in a week! :)
Thanks, it appears to be working fine for me now - first counter increase in a week! :)
43 hours ago
issue 3379
(Downloads counter seems to be broken) commented on by tonyz...@gmail.com
- As ningerso mentioned in Comment #2:
"That being said, the counters on downloads may still not increment on every
download. We set cache headers on
these downloads to reduce the load on our infrastructure and provide the end-user
with a faster experience. If
there is any cache along the route or you are using a web browser to attempt multiple
downloads, they will keep
and serve a copy of the file and we will not see the request and cannot increment the
counter."
Have you tested your counters with a new file?
As ningerso mentioned in Comment #2:
"That being said, the counters on downloads may still not increment on every
download. We set cache headers on
these downloads to reduce the load on our infrastructure and provide the end-user
with a faster experience. If
there is any cache along the route or you are using a web browser to attempt multiple
downloads, they will keep
and serve a copy of the file and we will not see the request and cannot increment the
counter."
Have you tested your counters with a new file?
43 hours ago
issue 3379
(Downloads counter seems to be broken) commented on by adin...@acciente.com
- @tonyz Thanks for the attention, just retested, the download counter is still broken :(
@tonyz Thanks for the attention, just retested, the download counter is still broken :(
44 hours ago
issue 3358
(Cannot search for a reporter without explicitly specifying i...) commented on by tech@frontrowcomputer.com
- Isn't it always a part of the comment?
Isn't it always a part of the comment?
44 hours ago
issue 3379
(Downloads counter seems to be broken) Status changed by tonyz...@gmail.com
- Download counters are functioning again.
issue 3389
(The issue status edit field should look like a dropdown even...) reported by djc.ocht...@gmail.com
- It currently looks like a text field until it gets focus. This is confusing.
It currently looks like a text field until it gets focus. This is confusing.
44 hours ago
issue 3388
(Be more conservative about auto-starring csets) reported by djc.ocht...@gmail.com
- I'm currently starred on nearly all of couchdb-python's Mercurial
changesets because I pushed the conversion from SVN. Here are two measures
that could maybe help preventing people from being auto-starred for things
where it doesn't make sense (the basic problem here is that the changeset
author in Mercurial is not verifiable and not necessarily the same as the
person who pushes).
* Don't auto-star anyone on the initial push into a hg repository if there
are over x csets being pushed: this should help with the conversion
scenario. Say we pick, 25 or 50 csets *and* it's the first push, then it's
highly likely to be a conversion and the pusher wouldn't necessarily be the
best person to star.
* Don't auto-star me when I push csets that have an author whose email
address is a known committer. E.g. when durin42@gmail.com is a committer on
my project and I push a changeset that has his email, I shouldn't be
auto-starred (in fact, he should probably be auto-starred).
I'm currently starred on nearly all of couchdb-python's Mercurial
changesets because I pushed the conversion from SVN. Here are two measures
that could maybe help preventing people from being auto-starred for things
where it doesn't make sense (the basic problem here is that the changeset
author in Mercurial is not verifiable and not necessarily the same as the
person who pushes).
* Don't auto-star anyone on the initial push into a hg repository if there
are over x csets being pushed: this should help with the conversion
scenario. Say we pick, 25 or 50 csets *and* it's the first push, then it's
highly likely to be a conversion and the pusher wouldn't necessarily be the
best person to star.
* Don't auto-star me when I push csets that have an author whose email
address is a known committer. E.g. when durin42@gmail.com is a committer on
my project and I push a changeset that has his email, I shouldn't be
auto-starred (in fact, he should probably be auto-starred).
45 hours ago
issue 3358
(Cannot search for a reporter without explicitly specifying i...) commented on by apa...@google.com
- If the reporter's name is specified as a part of the comment
'tech@frontrowcomputer.com', it will then appear as a part of the search result if
reporter: is not specified when searching for 'tech@frontrowcomputer.com'.
If the reporter's name is specified as a part of the comment
'tech@frontrowcomputer.com', it will then appear as a part of the search result if
reporter: is not specified when searching for 'tech@frontrowcomputer.com'.
46 hours ago
issue 3312
(Google's SSL certificate keeps changing) commented on by jo...@halfdanj.dk
- This just began to happen here again (i'm also Versions user)..
My tacroute is like this:
Traceroute er startet...
traceroute to googlecode.l.google.com (66.102.9.82), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1) 2.103 ms 1.602 ms 1.377 ms
2 ve43.dkkovbgcr00.perspektivbredband.net (85.235.19.1) 18.029 ms 12.217 ms 11.750 ms
3 ve8.semakvgcr00.perspektivbredband.net (213.185.31.45) 11.963 ms 13.317 ms 12.781 ms
4 ve1.semakvgpr00.perspektivbredband.net (213.185.31.54) 12.145 ms 12.750 ms 12.109 ms
5 217.75.99.124 (217.75.99.124) 12.644 ms 15.252 ms 12.348 ms
6 v1325-r78.gbl-cr0-r73.mlm.se.p80.net (82.96.1.101) 12.600 ms 13.742 ms 11.979 ms
7 te9-1-r73.cr1-r63.datl5-lkpg.se.p80.net (82.96.1.153) 21.283 ms 24.395 ms 21.259 ms
8 te9-2-r63.cr0-r64.datl5-lkpg.se.p80.net (82.96.1.149) 21.129 ms 21.032 ms 21.058 ms
9 te3-4-r64.cr0-r69.tc-sto.se.p80.net (82.96.1.145) 21.061 ms 21.728 ms 20.804 ms
10 72.14.198.177 (72.14.198.177) 25.929 ms 25.712 ms 23.892 ms
11 209.85.252.186 (209.85.252.186) 25.111 ms 25.860 ms 24.655 ms
12 209.85.242.188 (209.85.242.188) 46.113 ms 57.321 ms 46.110 ms
13 216.239.43.127 (216.239.43.127) 54.769 ms 51.512 ms 51.318 ms
14 72.14.232.148 (72.14.232.148) 61.323 ms 61.265 ms 61.953 ms
15 209.85.250.216 (209.85.250.216) 76.598 ms
209.85.251.190 (209.85.251.190) 72.546 ms 71.554 ms
16 72.14.232.235 (72.14.232.235) 74.585 ms 73.844 ms
72.14.232.239 (72.14.232.239) 71.792 ms
17 64.233.174.18 (64.233.174.18) 82.536 ms 78.332 ms 74.050 ms
18 lm-in-f82.1e100.net (66.102.9.82) 76.975 ms 74.200 ms 74.488 ms
This just began to happen here again (i'm also Versions user)..
My tacroute is like this:
Traceroute er startet...
traceroute to googlecode.l.google.com (66.102.9.82), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1) 2.103 ms 1.602 ms 1.377 ms
2 ve43.dkkovbgcr00.perspektivbredband.net (85.235.19.1) 18.029 ms 12.217 ms 11.750 ms
3 ve8.semakvgcr00.perspektivbredband.net (213.185.31.45) 11.963 ms 13.317 ms 12.781 ms
4 ve1.semakvgpr00.perspektivbredband.net (213.185.31.54) 12.145 ms 12.750 ms 12.109 ms
5 217.75.99.124 (217.75.99.124) 12.644 ms 15.252 ms 12.348 ms
6 v1325-r78.gbl-cr0-r73.mlm.se.p80.net (82.96.1.101) 12.600 ms 13.742 ms 11.979 ms
7 te9-1-r73.cr1-r63.datl5-lkpg.se.p80.net (82.96.1.153) 21.283 ms 24.395 ms 21.259 ms
8 te9-2-r63.cr0-r64.datl5-lkpg.se.p80.net (82.96.1.149) 21.129 ms 21.032 ms 21.058 ms
9 te3-4-r64.cr0-r69.tc-sto.se.p80.net (82.96.1.145) 21.061 ms 21.728 ms 20.804 ms
10 72.14.198.177 (72.14.198.177) 25.929 ms 25.712 ms 23.892 ms
11 209.85.252.186 (209.85.252.186) 25.111 ms 25.860 ms 24.655 ms
12 209.85.242.188 (209.85.242.188) 46.113 ms 57.321 ms 46.110 ms
13 216.239.43.127 (216.239.43.127) 54.769 ms 51.512 ms 51.318 ms
14 72.14.232.148 (72.14.232.148) 61.323 ms 61.265 ms 61.953 ms
15 209.85.250.216 (209.85.250.216) 76.598 ms
209.85.251.190 (209.85.251.190) 72.546 ms 71.554 ms
16 72.14.232.235 (72.14.232.235) 74.585 ms 73.844 ms
72.14.232.239 (72.14.232.239) 71.792 ms
17 64.233.174.18 (64.233.174.18) 82.536 ms 78.332 ms 74.050 ms
18 lm-in-f82.1e100.net (66.102.9.82) 76.975 ms 74.200 ms 74.488 ms
46 hours ago
issue 3358
(Cannot search for a reporter without explicitly specifying i...) commented on by tech@frontrowcomputer.com
- apa, please clarify. Thanks.
apa, please clarify. Thanks.
Last 7 days
Dec 08, 2009
issue 3386
(Commit emails no longer coming from unladen-swallow@googleco...) commented on by ArnelMandilagWork
- I am getting something similar...the projectname@googlecode.com sender was working up
until Thursday of last week (at least), but now commit messages I'm getting today are
coming from blahlalalalalala@codesite.bounces.google.com (the commit mail's from line
in Outlook (eep) says googlegroupname+owner@googlegroups.com on behalf of
projectname@googlecode.com), and so my mailbox rules no longer work.
I am getting something similar...the projectname@googlecode.com sender was working up
until Thursday of last week (at least), but now commit messages I'm getting today are
coming from blahlalalalalala@codesite.bounces.google.com (the commit mail's from line
in Outlook (eep) says googlegroupname+owner@googlegroups.com on behalf of
projectname@googlecode.com), and so my mailbox rules no longer work.
Dec 08, 2009
issue 3379
(Downloads counter seems to be broken) commented on by ningerso
- Issue 3387 has been merged into this issue.
