| Issue 293: | Integrating "Google Group" and "Google Code" | |
| 101 people starred this issue and may be notified of changes. | Back to list |
Sign in to add a comment
|
Google Group is a good service I'm using for discussing about my GoogleCode
hosted project.
Actually the only way to let users know that does exist a dicussion board
related to my project is adding a label (Administration --> Discussion
group) that will be showed in the right side of the home page.
I think that such an important section of my project should be more visible
possibly in form of an upper label.
Why don't give the user the possibility to add a new label called "Forum"
to integrate with the others ("Project home", "Downloads", "Wiki", "Issues"
and "Source")?
It seems reasonable to me even because "Code" and "Groups" are two project
belonging to the same company.
|
||||||||||||
,
Jul 10, 2007
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement Component-Other Milestone-2008
|
|||||||||||||
,
Sep 07, 2007
If you have integration in mind, *please* first ensure that Google Groups do something about the unmasked publicly harvestable e-mail addresses. <http://groups.google.com/group/Is-Something-Broken/browse_frm/thread/939a524886e590ec/> refers but I think Google Groups have not yet appreciated how seriously upset some users are, when they find that their e-mail addresses have been disclosed. Key point: such users do NOT intend for their e-mail addresses to be disclosed. Google Groups might argue that the user simply needs to do "this" or "that" to resolve the issue, but that's not the point: if Google is serious about its Privacy Policy then the issue should surely NEVER occur without the user's explicit permission. At least, make it clear to the new Group member that their address may be harvested. (That last sentence defies belief! Better to not upset users in the first place...) Thanks and regards Graham |
|||||||||||||
,
Jun 18, 2008
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Summary: Integrating "Google Group" and "Google Code"
Status: Accepted |
|||||||||||||
,
Sep 18, 2008
When creating a new project, google could present an option to create a Google Group as well. |
|||||||||||||
,
Sep 26, 2008
I agree with mcored... I don't create a hundred project a month, but it gets annoying to start a new project, and create the google groups... I always create 4 lists: issues, commits, dev and users, each of them with different configuration (web archive for issues and commits)... The option to create such lists could be offered in the creation process (as it happens on Java.net) |
|||||||||||||
,
Dec 17, 2008
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Status: Reviewed
Labels: -Milestone-2008 Milestone-2009 |
|||||||||||||
,
Jan 10, 2009
This would be really awesome to have. IMHO, this issue would worth a lot more stars. |
|||||||||||||
,
Apr 30, 2009
Newsgroups are quite old and most people prefer forums like PhpBB or vBulletin. CodePlex and Sourceforge have forum style discussion boards and I really hope Google Code gets something like it too. |
|||||||||||||
,
Apr 30, 2009
In our experience a GoogleGroup is better than SF-forums and even better than any other kind of forums (the project I'm talking about is NHibernate). Note: this is so true that we are using GoogleGroup even for development-list. |
|||||||||||||
,
May 01, 2009
for me, Gogle Groups will be best form of forums when two conditions would met: 1) allow to format message using WYSIWYG editor like modern forum drivers allow. actually, i want to have WYSIWYG editor available in all parts of project - Wiki, Issues, Forum 2) put it inside Forum tab instead of going into entirely new page. it's important to keep presentation of project as "everything is here" and external links just break this abstraction |
|||||||||||||
,
Aug 02, 2009
I should be a very useful feature. It is even better if a "blog" tab is integrated with "Project Home" "Downloads" and others (at least as an option to have). |
|||||||||||||
,
Sep 04, 2009
Issue 1382 has been merged into this issue. |
|||||||||||||
| ► Sign in to add a comment | |||||||||||||