| Issue 427: | Look into ClickOnce support | |
| 2 people starred this issue and may be notified of changes. | Back to list |
(from Mike's notes file) |
|
,
Feb 01, 2009
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Owner: Mike.Popoloski
Labels: Milestone-March09 |
|
,
Feb 18, 2009
Assigning to Promit. Installation related task.
Owner: promit.roy
|
|
,
Feb 26, 2009
Almost certainly not going to have time for this, pri dropped for now. |
|
,
Mar 05, 2009
Vote for setting to Low priority. Click once is definitely a corner case feature not used by most .NET developers, and most likely will stay a niche. 2 cents. |
|
,
Mar 05, 2009
Agreed.
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low
|
|
,
Mar 12, 2009
What exactly do we mean by "ClickOnce support" anyway? The IDE does not support the Publish target for class library assemblies... |
|
,
Mar 12, 2009
What I had in mind was that hitting Publish on a SlimDX based app would cause the Redist package to be rolled up into whatever ClickOnce creates. |
|
,
Mar 13, 2009
It turns out what I mentioned in IRC wasn't entirely correct anyway. We can create a custom package by way of http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms165429.aspx and install that, this should allow users to bundle the SlimDX redist into the setup.exe generated by ClickOnce provided they manually check the box in their project's publish settings. I presume we'd want to support it for both VS 2005 and VS 2008, which means installing product.xml and package.xml (which may have slightly different formats) to two locations. The guide for 2005 is here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms165429(VS.80).aspx I'll look into this this weekend.
Owner: josh.petrie
|
|
,
Mar 29, 2009
Simply do not have the resources to do this for March.
Labels: -Milestone-March09 Milestone-June08
|
|
,
Mar 29, 2009
Oops, wrong year for the milestone.
Labels: -Milestone-June08 Milestone-June09
|
|
,
Jul 09, 2009
Do this for August or suffer my wrath!
Labels: -Priority-Low -Milestone-June09 Priority-High Milestone-Aug09
|
|
,
Jul 09, 2009
It's on my theoretical to-do list for next week actually! |
|
,
Aug 18, 2009
Another vote NOT to do this feature. Reasons are: - Doesn't work on Firefox without a special plugin, and even then the FF click-once plug-in has become a source of bitterness and controversy for FireFox users. Also has lesser support for other browsers on Windows (Chrome/Safari). - It's non-standard. Yes DirectX itself is non standard but it's not inherently tied to the Internet space where non-standard things are the biggest problem. - Most .NET developers do not use it for deployment. It has a small following relative to the .NET community as a whole. motives: http://lee.hdgreetings.com/2009/08/open-source-triage.html |
|
,
Sep 27, 2009
Screw it, we don't have time.
Labels: -Priority-High -Milestone-Aug09 Priority-Low
|
|
,
Nov 19, 2009
Somebody just asked about this in IRC today. |
|
,
Nov 19, 2009
I still want this, and it's relatively easy to do.
Labels: -Priority-Low Priority-Medium
|
|
,
Dec 15, 2009
I wants this. |
|
,
Dec 15, 2009
I also vote for this, despite what the anti-feature guy says :) ClickOnce is a ridiculously handy way to distribute little apps, and I would love to package up my texture builder using it, except I would need slimdx support first :) |
|
|
|