Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature Request: Add waitOnLogMessage #343

Closed
renas opened this issue Aug 19, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Add waitOnLogMessage #343

renas opened this issue Aug 19, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement imported Priority-Medium

Comments

@renas
Copy link
Contributor

renas commented Aug 19, 2015

From hamiltont on May 24, 2012 13:24:38

Currently the waitOnXX options are a bit sparse. Perhaps also add a waitOnLog(String TAG, String message), where either can be a regex?

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/robotium/issues/detail?id=264
@renas
Copy link
Contributor Author

renas commented Aug 19, 2015

From hamiltont on May 24, 2012 13:44:15

Another thought: waitForTabIndexToChange() e.g. once some code completes the tab will be switched

@renas
Copy link
Contributor Author

renas commented Aug 19, 2015

From renasr...@gmail.com on May 25, 2012 01:17:39

Thanks for the request. I really like the idea of waiting for a certain log message. Lets investigate this :)

Status: Accepted
Owner: renasr...@gmail.com

@renas
Copy link
Contributor Author

renas commented Aug 19, 2015

From renasr...@gmail.com on August 04, 2012 11:31:59

This will be included in 3.4.

Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Enhancement

@renas
Copy link
Contributor Author

renas commented Aug 19, 2015

From renasr...@gmail.com on August 07, 2012 01:51:52

This has been included in 3.4.

Status: Verified

@renas renas closed this as completed Aug 19, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement imported Priority-Medium
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@renas