Contact Us

How can I see the current volume from the command line?

I am writing an announcer for XChat and using another player's announcer for the task since it uses the same scripting language for the front end. However, when I enter the hook, this is what is returned to local view.

{{{ File "/home/jimn2k/.xchat2/scripts/quodlibet.py", line 58, in show_song

end = re.compile('(\[|\]|%\d |\n)?').sub('', data3?)

IndexError?: list index out of range'}}}

I received four separate values when I ran the command "quodlibet --print-playing", so naturally assumed that the index entries ran 0 to 3 after the application of the regular expression. Could you please help? Thank you for your time and consideration.

I don't know where else to post this, but I just want to say -- thanks to the developers for the excellent work on Quod Libet and Ex Falso!! I was using Rhythmbox on Ubuntu before, but I think Quod Libet and Ex Falso represent a very innovative way to manage and play your music. Thanks very much and keep it up!!

I don't know where else to post this either, but will the quodlibet 2.1 volume bug (in Lucid) be fixed soon ? ie before Maverik ? or do we have to wait for QL 2.2 in the repo (and when will that be ?). Anyway, i'm still using quodlibet, even with no volume control, that's how awesome quodlibet is ! (oh, and while i'm at it, is there a(n easy) way to run bash scripts on selected songs ? i can do it on current song, with .quodlibet/current)

Thanks !

Hope this is the right place to leave some compliments. After trying all other players running at Ubuntu I'll stick to QL. All the nice features are combined in this awesome piece of software, not a single one is missing. QL organizes my music collection and plays playlists, albums and single tracks as I would expect. From now can I focus on enjoying music rather than dealing with half baken stuff. It deserved its icon within the startup applications. I'll trust you, you will add the right features with every update and keep it usable.

Thanks!

Compliments to the chef: Easy on the eyes, light on the bugs, heavy on power, and good on system resources. I wish it was easier to step backwards in time. I.e., a back button for the regex box, and a song back button thats smart enough to also go back to the last query/playlist.

@qe2eqe - For that first issue I agree but others have said the history drop-down provides this:

http://code.google.com/p/quodlibet/issues/detail?id=233&can=1&q=back&colspec=Stars%20ID%20Type%20Component%20Milestone%20Summary

Re-open if you think it's relevant.

I love Quod Libet ! It's my player of choice now, and I've tried, well... "all" of them :D Cheers and great work lads !!!

Is there a way to set up Quod Libet so that it plays all the movements of a classical music piece in sequence? I prefer to use shuffle, rather than bother with creating playlists. But when QL happens to pick a track in its shuffle that is the first movement of a piece, I'd like it to play it, then play all the other movements of the same piece, in sequence, then go back to shuffle. And if QL picks a track in its shuffle that is the second, third, fourth, etc. movement in its shuffle, I'd it to detect that they are non-initial movements and skip over them. I know I can create tags to keep track of the movements. I just don't know how to get QL to use them the way I describe.

I agree - added Issue 703 (but still: please submit feature requests to the issue tracker).