Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

REST should be rejected when the current TYPE is ASCII #88

Closed
giampaolo opened this issue May 28, 2014 · 4 comments
Closed

REST should be rejected when the current TYPE is ASCII #88

giampaolo opened this issue May 28, 2014 · 4 comments
Labels
bug Component-Library imported imported from old googlecode site and very likely outdated

Comments

@giampaolo
Copy link
Owner

From billiej...@gmail.com on November 12, 2008 13:10:12

Because of the different representation files could have on the server and
on the client, using REST when the current TYPE is ASCII shouldn't make sense.
The current implementation accepts REST, regardless of the current TYPE and
this should be avoided.

Note that this hasn't been expressively stated in any RFC but proftpd and a
bunch of other ftpds reject REST, most likely because it's the more
reasonable thing to do, I think.

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/issues/detail?id=88
@giampaolo
Copy link
Owner Author

From billiej...@gmail.com on November 13, 2008 06:24:16

Fixed in r434 .

Status: Finished

@giampaolo
Copy link
Owner Author

From billiej...@gmail.com on November 20, 2008 12:56:33

Labels: Milestone-0.5.1

@giampaolo
Copy link
Owner Author

From billiej...@gmail.com on January 21, 2009 10:05:51

Fixed in version 0.5.1 released on 2009-01-21.

Status: Fixed

@giampaolo
Copy link
Owner Author

From billiej...@gmail.com on April 02, 2009 08:53:55

Labels: -OpSys-All

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Component-Library imported imported from old googlecode site and very likely outdated
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@giampaolo