Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

two different versions of protobuf-2.5.0.tar.gz: one works, one doesn't #564

Closed
demianturner opened this issue Jul 1, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Comments

@demianturner
Copy link

This screengrab hopefully summarises the problem, big wtf as one wouldn't suspect the 2 files to be different. The one that doesn't work doesn't have the required configure script.

protobuf3

@xfxyjwf
Copy link
Contributor

xfxyjwf commented Jul 1, 2015

I know this is confusing but the download link you see in the first snapshot is not provided by us. It's provided by github and just a copy of the code in the git repository rather than a release version.

In the second snapshot, you can also see two other links "Source code (zip)" and "Source code (tar.gz)". These are also provided by github and does not have the configure file as well.

@xfxyjwf xfxyjwf closed this as completed Jul 1, 2015
@demianturner
Copy link
Author

I took the time to highlight the problem because it wasted about 1 hr of my time. Thought it would be useful to future users of your software.

@xfxyjwf
Copy link
Contributor

xfxyjwf commented Jul 1, 2015

Sorry for that. I'm contacting github support to see if there is an option to disable those archive links.

@xfxyjwf
Copy link
Contributor

xfxyjwf commented Jul 1, 2015

Just got a reply from github support team that such an option doesn't exist yet so we will have to bear with these extra download links for the time being.

In the beginning of the README.md file we have mentioned what users are expected to do if they get a package without gmock and configure script. Feel free to give us suggestions if you think the current text is not clear enough.

@demianturner
Copy link
Author

I think you'll always get users that focus on the INSTALL.txt rather than the README. Maybe add a sentence to the INSTALL file that says what to do if the configure script is missing. Cheers.

adellahlou pushed a commit to adellahlou/protobuf that referenced this issue Apr 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants