Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed issue #65 and #157 #314

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

wolf34736
Copy link

commit 49dcfb7 is about issue #65

commit a865679 is about issue #157

Review on Reviewable

root and others added 10 commits April 16, 2015 01:11
Added a function to determine if instance isEmpty()
Found where to implements clang format
Making a .clang-format file instead of posting code here
File that will organize all code. This will be added to the new directory after pipelined. Need to add Language parameter
Added clang-format to directory that is made by code
@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project, in which case you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please let us know the company's name.

@googlebot
Copy link

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for the commit author(s). If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.

@edgar-pek
Copy link

I've signed it. Sorry for the delay.

@xfxyjwf
Copy link
Contributor

xfxyjwf commented Jun 11, 2015

Hi @edgar-pek , this PR mixes quite a few different things together. Could you split it and send them separately?

@edgar-pek
Copy link

I've created a pull request #490 that fixes this issue.

@haberman
Copy link
Member

I'm closing this PR since it superseded by your other PR(s).

@haberman haberman closed this Feb 17, 2016
taoso pushed a commit to taoso/protobuf that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2018
Found with honnef.co/go/tools/cmd/gosimple.

	proto/all_test.go:522:12: should use !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "Kind") instead (S1003)
	proto/all_test.go:1170:3: should merge variable declaration with assignment on next line (S1021)
	proto/all_test.go:1857:5: should use !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "RequiredField.Label") instead (S1003)
	proto/all_test.go:1873:5: should use !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "RequiredField.{Unknown}") instead (S1003)
	proto/all_test.go:1882:5: should use !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "RequiredField.Label") instead (S1003)
	proto/equal.go:149:2: should use 'return <expr>' instead of 'if <expr> { return <bool> }; return <bool>' (S1008)
	proto/message_set.go:97:2: should use 'return <expr>' instead of 'if <expr> { return <bool> }; return <bool>' (S1008)
	proto/properties.go:386:4: redundant break statement (S1023)
	proto/properties.go:434:4: redundant break statement (S1023)
	proto/properties.go:510:5: redundant break statement (S1023)
	proto/properties.go:520:5: redundant break statement (S1023)
	proto/properties.go:539:5: redundant break statement (S1023)
	proto/text.go:482:2: 'if err != nil { return err }; return nil' can be simplified to 'return err' (S1013)
	proto/text_parser.go:891:2: 'if pe != nil { return pe }; return nil' can be simplified to 'return pe' (S1013)
	protoc-gen-go/generator/generator.go:137:22: should use make([]string, n) instead (S1019)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants