poster-extension - Project Hosting on Google Code

Last 30 days Dec 21, 2009 issue 39 (feature request: support chrome) reported by kofreestyler - :) :) Dec 14, 2009 issue 1 (Detecting non-absolute URLs) commented on by rogerpack2005 - yes please humanize this bizarre error message if possible... yes please humanize this bizarre error message if possible... Older Dec 01, 2009 issue 37 (",UTF-8" added at the end of Content-Type field) Status changed by alexmilowski - Marking as invalid according to last comment. Status: Invalid Marking as invalid according to last comment. Status: Invalid Dec 01, 2009 issue 38 (Feature : send a multipart/form-data content) reported by reywillow - It would be an interesting feature to be able to generate and send a multipart/form-data content, (but this may need lots of UI development) At least, it would be great to be able to insert CR-LF (\r\n) into the request body to meet multipart/form-data specifications. Thanks It would be an interesting feature to be able to generate and send a multipart/form-data content, (but this may need lots of UI development) At least, it would be great to be able to insert CR-LF (\r\n) into the request body to meet multipart/form-data specifications. Thanks Dec 01, 2009 issue 37 (",UTF-8" added at the end of Content-Type field) commented on by reywillow - After further investigation, it seems that it is not the UTF-8 parameter that causes the parsing to fail, but the form-data separation. The specification tells a \r\n (CR-LF) is the separation marker after the boundaries. The issue is void, from my point of view. After further investigation, it seems that it is not the UTF-8 parameter that causes the parsing to fail, but the form-data separation. The specification tells a \r\n (CR-LF) is the separation marker after the boundaries. The issue is void, from my point of view. Nov 24, 2009 issue 37 (",UTF-8" added at the end of Content-Type field) reported by reywillow - 1. Set Content-Type to multipart/form-data;boundary=-------XXXXXXX 2. Set the request body to boundary=-------XXXXXXX boundary=-------XXXXXXX-- 3. Post to your server url Serverside, the Content-Type field has a trailing ",UTF-8". This makes multipart boundaries detection inconsistant. I use Poster 2.0.0 on firefox 3.0.15, over Ubuntu 9.04 My server is a java server running on tomcat, I use the org.apache libs to parse the request with the uploaded file. 1. Set Content-Type to multipart/form-data;boundary=-------XXXXXXX 2. Set the request body to boundary=-------XXXXXXX boundary=-------XXXXXXX-- 3. Post to your server url Serverside, the Content-Type field has a trailing ",UTF-8". This makes multipart boundaries detection inconsistant. I use Poster 2.0.0 on firefox 3.0.15, over Ubuntu 9.04 My server is a java server running on tomcat, I use the org.apache libs to parse the request with the uploaded file. Nov 17, 2009 issue 36 (Feature: show response in Firefox) reported by gsmdib - Would be great to have a 'Show in Firefox' button near 'Close' in the Response window. Usecase: submit a request to server, get a 500 response with html-formatted stacktrace details in response body. Would be great to have a 'Show in Firefox' button near 'Close' in the Response window. Usecase: submit a request to server, get a 500 response with html-formatted stacktrace details in response body. Nov 13, 2009 issue 35 (old instructions) reported by rogerdpack - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2691 seems to have old instructions warning you against 1.7... https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2691 seems to have old instructions warning you against 1.7... Nov 06, 2009 issue 34 ([enhancement] http DELETE with body) reported by michael.brackx - What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. enter an url 2. enter a body 3. click submit What is the expected output? What do you see instead? The delete request should have a body. The delete request has no body. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? 2.0.0 Please provide any additional information below. perhaps deleteUrl could be handleSend iso handleGet What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. enter an url 2. enter a body 3. click submit What is the expected output? What do you see instead? The delete request should have a body. The delete request has no body. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? 2.0.0 Please provide any additional information below. perhaps deleteUrl could be handleSend iso handleGet Oct 30, 2009 issue 13 (HTTP method not consistent when redirected) commented on by scholesmafia - It's a Firefox bug; see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238144 and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343028 It's a Firefox bug; see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=238144 and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343028 Oct 17, 2009 issue 33 (Specifiing Header properties not working) reported by fly.yamaha - Trying to setup a http get request with a header property of accept: txt/html. The web server (jetty) is defaulting back to html some how. Is this a known problem with firefox 3.5 & the 2.0 version? Trying to setup a http get request with a header property of accept: txt/html. The web server (jetty) is defaulting back to html some how. Is this a known problem with firefox 3.5 & the 2.0 version? Oct 13, 2009 issue 32 (Support charset GB2312?) commented on by zhouhuiG - Today I changed WindowsXP "control panel"->"language" from chinese to english , characters are being interpreted correctly , I try changed back (from english to chinese), it still are interpreted correctly ... Perhaps this problem cause by my os-environment setting. Thanks again Today I changed WindowsXP "control panel"->"language" from chinese to english , characters are being interpreted correctly , I try changed back (from english to chinese), it still are interpreted correctly ... Perhaps this problem cause by my os-environment setting. Thanks again Oct 13, 2009 issue 32 (Support charset GB2312?) commented on by alexmilowski - What character is it not displaying? I see that the page comes back with the proper HTTP charset parameter on the content-type header. As such, the text value received should be properly translated. On my Mac, it seems like the characters are being interpreted correctly. Of course, you may not be able to see each character depending on whether you have an appropriate font. So, in the end, I need more specifics. Exactly what character in what place in the document is not being displayed correct. BTW, this extension uses Firefox's facilities to display the text and decode the HTTP response. As such, this may be a Firefox issue. What character is it not displaying? I see that the page comes back with the proper HTTP charset parameter on the content-type header. As such, the text value received should be properly translated. On my Mac, it seems like the characters are being interpreted correctly. Of course, you may not be able to see each character depending on whether you have an appropriate font. So, in the end, I need more specifics. Exactly what character in what place in the document is not being displayed correct. BTW, this extension uses Firefox's facilities to display the text and decode the HTTP response. As such, this may be a Firefox issue. Oct 13, 2009 issue 32 (Support charset GB2312?) reported by zhouhuiG - Please excuse my poor english... I wish you understand my question...8-( What steps will reproduce the problem? browse webpage(http://www.baidu.com/) that charset encode in GB2312，poster will display unrecognizable character. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I wish poster can recognize that page charset encode in GB2312 What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? poster-2.0.0/Firefox 3.5/Windows XP Thank you in advance Please excuse my poor english... I wish you understand my question...8-( What steps will reproduce the problem? browse webpage(http://www.baidu.com/) that charset encode in GB2312，poster will display unrecognizable character. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I wish poster can recognize that page charset encode in GB2312 What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? poster-2.0.0/Firefox 3.5/Windows XP Thank you in advance Oct 05, 2009 issue 31 (Viewing images returned (instead of a datastream)) reported by jgazza - It would be nice if when the HTTP request returns an image you could actually view the image :) I am seeing the raw datastream which is not too useful! It would be nice if when the HTTP request returns an image you could actually view the image :) I am seeing the raw datastream which is not too useful! Sep 17, 2009 issue 15 (No authorization header set ) commented on by knobot - yes, taht would be good, I was referring to basic auth. yes, taht would be good, I was referring to basic auth. Sep 16, 2009 issue 15 (No authorization header set ) changed by alexmilowski - Firefox requires a challenge to set the Authorization. I can add a way to add a Basic authorization header. Digest authentication always requires a challenge request. Status: Accepted Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect Firefox requires a challenge to set the Authorization. I can add a way to add a Basic authorization header. Digest authentication always requires a challenge request. Status: Accepted Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect Sep 16, 2009 issue 22 ([Enhancement] Add option to load response in a new/currnet b...) commented on by alexmilowski - Issue 28 has been merged into this issue. Issue 28 has been merged into this issue. Sep 16, 2009 issue 28 (Allow saving of response) changed by alexmilowski - Status: Duplicate Status: Duplicate Sep 16, 2009 issue 27 (Redirects are not visible) changed by alexmilowski - Status: Accepted Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect Status: Accepted Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect Sep 16, 2009 issue 27 (Redirects are not visible) commented on by alexmilowski - Firefox is automatically following the headers. I'm not sure if there is a way to tell the XMLHttpRequest object to not follow re-directs. I'll have to research this. Firefox is automatically following the headers. I'm not sure if there is a way to tell the XMLHttpRequest object to not follow re-directs. I'll have to research this. Sep 16, 2009 issue 30 (Authenticated sessions not shared with Firefox 3.5) Status changed by alexmilowski - The internal server error cannot be caused by Poster. You should handle the lack of authentication gracefully on your side. Poster uses the XMLHttpRequest object to send requests which has extended features when you use it within a plugin. Unfortunately, you can't force Firefox to send an authentication the first time. It requires a authentication challenge somewhere along the way (either via Poster or the web browser) to know that the "Authorization" header should be sent. You need to send a "WWW-Authenticate" header as a response for either Basic or Digest authentication when you receive an request that requires authentication. That would be the appropriate response for the server to avoid a 500 status return. Status: WontFix The internal server error cannot be caused by Poster. You should handle the lack of authentication gracefully on your side. Poster uses the XMLHttpRequest object to send requests which has extended features when you use it within a plugin. Unfortunately, you can't force Firefox to send an authentication the first time. It requires a authentication challenge somewhere along the way (either via Poster or the web browser) to know that the "Authorization" header should be sent. You need to send a "WWW-Authenticate" header as a response for either Basic or Digest authentication when you receive an request that requires authentication. That would be the appropriate response for the server to avoid a 500 status return. Status: WontFix Sep 16, 2009 issue 30 (Authenticated sessions not shared with Firefox 3.5) reported by angela.r...@metoffice.gov.uk - What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Log into a server requiring authentication in Firefox 2. Post request to servlet on server using Poster 3. Get internal server error returned because Poster is not logged on to the server What is the expected output? What do you see instead? In the previous version (see below) Poster seemed to share authenticated sessions with Firefox and returned the expected results from the servlet What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Have upgraded to 2.0 on Firefox 3.5 - was working for me on the previous version I had (sorry don't know which one) with Firefox 2.x Please provide any additional information below. I was finding problems with in-between version of Firefox 3.1.10 not sharing authenticated sessions across tabs, but upgrading to 3.5 has fixed this, but not the problem with Poster. What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Log into a server requiring authentication in Firefox 2. Post request to servlet on server using Poster 3. Get internal server error returned because Poster is not logged on to the server What is the expected output? What do you see instead? In the previous version (see below) Poster seemed to share authenticated sessions with Firefox and returned the expected results from the servlet What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Have upgraded to 2.0 on Firefox 3.5 - was working for me on the previous version I had (sorry don't know which one) with Firefox 2.x Please provide any additional information below. I was finding problems with in-between version of Firefox 3.1.10 not sharing authenticated sessions across tabs, but upgrading to 3.5 has fixed this, but not the problem with Poster. Aug 28, 2009 issue 29 (Compatibility Firefox 3.5.2) Status changed by alexmilowski - Version 2.0 supports 3.5.2. Go here to get it: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addons/versions/2691 If you can review that version, it will help get it out as the latest version. I don't know why it takes so long but, ... it does. Status: Invalid Version 2.0 supports 3.5.2. Go here to get it: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addons/versions/2691 If you can review that version, it will help get it out as the latest version. I don't know why it takes so long but, ... it does. Status: Invalid Aug 28, 2009 issue 29 (Compatibility Firefox 3.5.2) reported by ealogar - Poster extension is not compatible with the last version of Firefox 3.5.2. Poster extension is not compatible with the last version of Firefox 3.5.2. Aug 27, 2009 issue 28 (Allow saving of response) commented on by 128625 - Oops, sorry, this is a duplicate for issue 22... Oops, sorry, this is a duplicate for issue 22... Aug 27, 2009 issue 28 (Allow saving of response) reported by 128625 - Problem: If a webservice responds with an image, the output gets garbled in the response window (See screenshot). Feature request Provide a way to save the response to a file. Or provide the option to send the response content back to Firefox where it can be displayed as intended. Problem: If a webservice responds with an image, the output gets garbled in the response window (See screenshot). Feature request Provide a way to save the response to a file. Or provide the option to send the response content back to Firefox where it can be displayed as intended. Aug 26, 2009 issue 27 (Redirects are not visible) reported by 128625 - Problem: 1. Call a webservice which will result in a 301 permanent redirect. 2. Have a look at the response window. The status now says '200 OK' when in fact I was getting a 301 permanent redirect with a new location. I would wish for a way to see the redirect header and the new location, before deciding to follow it. (Poster 2.0.0 on Firefox 3.5.2 on Windows XP) Problem: 1. Call a webservice which will result in a 301 permanent redirect. 2. Have a look at the response window. The status now says '200 OK' when in fact I was getting a 301 permanent redirect with a new location. I would wish for a way to see the redirect header and the new location, before deciding to follow it. (Poster 2.0.0 on Firefox 3.5.2 on Windows XP) Aug 14, 2009 issue 26 (Support for client certificates) commented on by arunkuma...@gmail.com - Edit > Preferences > Advanced > Encryption > View Certificates > Your Certificates > Import Edit > Preferences > Advanced > Encryption > View Certificates > Your Certificates > Import Aug 14, 2009 issue 26 (Support for client certificates) commented on by alexmilowski - Interesting. This feels like a bug in Firefox as that kind thing should be handled automatically. Where exactly are you adding the certificate? Interesting. This feels like a bug in Firefox as that kind thing should be handled automatically. Where exactly are you adding the certificate? Aug 13, 2009 issue 26 (Support for client certificates) commented on by arunkuma...@gmail.com - I am installing PKCS#12 certificate using Firefox -> Edit -> Preferences menu. Site to which I am sending request using POSTER requires a client certificate and when I send the request from Firefox, it works because Firefox will send the cert. I am installing PKCS#12 certificate using Firefox -> Edit -> Preferences menu. Site to which I am sending request using POSTER requires a client certificate and when I send the request from Firefox, it works because Firefox will send the cert. Aug 13, 2009 issue 26 (Support for client certificates) commented on by alexmilowski - Are you installing certificates via preferences? Poster uses the xpcom version of xmlhttprequest and so doesn't have access to much beyond what you can do via that Interface. There are a few more feature when you run inside an extension but I don't know about certificate support. Are you installing certificates via preferences? Poster uses the xpcom version of xmlhttprequest and so doesn't have access to much beyond what you can do via that Interface. There are a few more feature when you run inside an extension but I don't know about certificate support. Aug 13, 2009 issue 26 (Support for client certificates) reported by arunkuma...@gmail.com - POSTER should be able to submit/send client certificates if any certificate is installed in Firefox for the site, to which we sending a request using POSTER. POSTER should be able to submit/send client certificates if any certificate is installed in Firefox for the site, to which we sending a request using POSTER. Aug 06, 2009 r26 (updated version for minor patch) committed by alexmilowski - updated version for minor patch updated version for minor patch Aug 06, 2009 r25 (updated default font size to 0.9em added a spacer between th...) committed by alexmilowski - updated default font size to 0.9em added a spacer between the action buttons and the ddl box updated default font size to 0.9em added a spacer between the action buttons and the ddl box Aug 06, 2009 issue 24 (Dialog Text is too small) commented on by lhasadad - btw, I am using a display thats 1600x1200, not sure what affect that might have btw, I am using a display thats 1600x1200, not sure what affect that might have Aug 05, 2009 issue 25 (Firefox add-ons site has an old version of Poster) Status changed by alexmilowski - We all have to wait for Mozilla to "approve" the new version and make it generally available. Status: Invalid We all have to wait for Mozilla to "approve" the new version and make it generally available. Status: Invalid Aug 05, 2009 issue 25 (Firefox add-ons site has an old version of Poster) reported by robertjhunter - What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Visit the Add-ons for Firefox site at https://addons.mozilla.org/ 2. Search for Poster 3. Click on "Poster" by Alex Milowski What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I expect to see an "Install now" button. Instead, I see "This add-on is for older versions of Firefox". That's because I see version 1.7.1, so I had to find the Google Code developer site for 2.0.0. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Firefox 3.5.2 on Windows XP. Please provide any additional information below. What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Visit the Add-ons for Firefox site at https://addons.mozilla.org/ 2. Search for Poster 3. Click on "Poster" by Alex Milowski What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I expect to see an "Install now" button. Instead, I see "This add-on is for older versions of Firefox". That's because I see version 1.7.1, so I had to find the Google Code developer site for 2.0.0. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Firefox 3.5.2 on Windows XP. Please provide any additional information below. Aug 05, 2009 issue 24 (Dialog Text is too small) commented on by alexmilowski - That's somewhat odd. I don't quite see the same issue here on the Mac. I'll have to test this one Windows. That's somewhat odd. I don't quite see the same issue here on the Mac. I'll have to test this one Windows. Aug 05, 2009 issue 24 (Dialog Text is too small) reported by lhasadad - What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. bring up poster dialog via menu or status icon What is the expected output? What do you see instead? readable text about the size of other menu, dialog items in firefox What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? 2.0 Poster on 3.5.1 FF on Windows XP 32 bit with SP2 installed Please provide any additional information below. will attach screen print What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. bring up poster dialog via menu or status icon What is the expected output? What do you see instead? readable text about the size of other menu, dialog items in firefox What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? 2.0 Poster on 3.5.1 FF on Windows XP 32 bit with SP2 installed Please provide any additional information below. will attach screen print Aug 03, 2009 issue 9 (Usability: Adding a Menu Item) commented on by mskadu - Many thanks! Many thanks! Aug 02, 2009 poster-2.0.0.xpi (Version 2.0.0) file uploaded by alexmilowski - Labels: Featured Type-Installer OpSys-All Labels: Featured Type-Installer OpSys-All Aug 02, 2009 r24 (updated about to have link to code hosting) committed by alexmilowski - updated about to have link to code hosting updated about to have link to code hosting Aug 02, 2009 r23 (updated version to 2.0.0) committed by alexmilowski - updated version to 2.0.0 updated version to 2.0.0 Aug 02, 2009 issue 3 (Array in parametres) Labels changed by alexmilowski - What do you mean by "sending arrays as parameters" ? Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect What do you mean by "sending arrays as parameters" ? Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect Aug 02, 2009 issue 13 (HTTP method not consistent when redirected) changed by alexmilowski - It currently doesn't do anything more than what a single request does. I could add this as an option. Status: Accepted Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect It currently doesn't do anything more than what a single request does. I could add this as an option. Status: Accepted Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect Aug 02, 2009 issue 11 (Support for HTTP Digest Authentication) Labels changed by alexmilowski - Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect Aug 02, 2009 issue 5 (The status bar icon is too big) Labels changed by alexmilowski - I'm not certain what is being asked for now. The icon isn't larger than the status bar size now. Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect I'm not certain what is being asked for now. The icon isn't larger than the status bar size now. Labels: Type-Enhancement −Type-Defect Aug 02, 2009 issue 17 (A little bit of documentation please) Labels changed by alexmilowski - Labels: Type-Task −Type-Defect Labels: Type-Task −Type-Defect Aug 02, 2009 issue 17 (A little bit of documentation please) Status changed by alexmilowski - I'll put some on this website. Status: Accepted I'll put some on this website. Status: Accepted

issue 30 (Authenticated sessions not shared with Firefox 3.5) reported by angela.r...@metoffice.gov.uk - What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Log into a server requiring authentication in Firefox 2. Post request to servlet on server using Poster 3. Get internal server error returned because Poster is not logged on to the server What is the expected output? What do you see instead? In the previous version (see below) Poster seemed to share authenticated sessions with Firefox and returned the expected results from the servlet What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Have upgraded to 2.0 on Firefox 3.5 - was working for me on the previous version I had (sorry don't know which one) with Firefox 2.x Please provide any additional information below. I was finding problems with in-between version of Firefox 3.1.10 not sharing authenticated sessions across tabs, but upgrading to 3.5 has fixed this, but not the problem with Poster.

What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Log into a server requiring authentication in Firefox 2. Post request to servlet on server using Poster 3. Get internal server error returned because Poster is not logged on to the server What is the expected output? What do you see instead? In the previous version (see below) Poster seemed to share authenticated sessions with Firefox and returned the expected results from the servlet What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Have upgraded to 2.0 on Firefox 3.5 - was working for me on the previous version I had (sorry don't know which one) with Firefox 2.x Please provide any additional information below. I was finding problems with in-between version of Firefox 3.1.10 not sharing authenticated sessions across tabs, but upgrading to 3.5 has fixed this, but not the problem with Poster.

Last 30 days

Older