| Issue 12: | Doubts about n-ary datatypes | |
| 1 person starred this issue and may be notified of changes. | Back to list |
Sign in to add a comment
|
See: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-dev/2007JanMar/0162.html> Brief summary (even if you dump datatype groups, which were not intended to be part of OWL 1.1; this should be clarified): N-ary datatypes seem both fragile and wrongly expressive (as compared, e.g., to dl-safe rules with built-ins). The key example is unit conversions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
Mar 29, 2007
Also, there are no built-in n-ary datatypes, nor a language for defining them. E.g., see:
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-dev/2007JanMar/0104.html>
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
Mar 29, 2007
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Owner: horrocks
Cc: bparsia borismotik |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
Oct 24, 2007
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Status: Migrated
Owner: ian.r.horrocks |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Sign in to add a comment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
