Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ontopoly - Removing fields from topic type definition #369

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 16, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Ontopoly - Removing fields from topic type definition #369

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 16, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels
Component-Ontopoly Defect GoogleCode Priority-Medium Release5.2.0

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link 

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Edit a topic type (multiple fields are present, some from a super-type, some 
for this type.
2. Remove a field from the definition
3. A (random?) field is removed.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Clicking the remove button on the right side of the field should remove THAT 
field. Instead a (random?) field is removed from the definition. Probably in 
order of creation (can't verify that).

Please use labels and text to provide additional information.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Combal...@gmail.com on 7 Mar 2011 at 12:11
@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author 

Can somthing be done about this one? It's very annoying!

Original comment by Combal...@gmail.com on 29 Mar 2011 at 7:14

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author 

I am seeing this as well. I created an abstract topic type with several 
subtypes and I wanted to remove the "Name" field from the abstract type but 
instead Ontopoly chose another field to remove. I think this is a serious bug.

Original comment by dan.sp...@gmail.com on 13 May 2011 at 3:44

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by lar...@gmail.com on 18 Aug 2011 at 7:01

  • Changed state: Accepted
  • Added labels: Release5.2.0, Component-Ontopoly

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author 

This issue was closed by revision r2194.

Original comment by qsieb...@gmail.com on 13 Sep 2011 at 9:16

  • Changed state: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Component-Ontopoly Defect GoogleCode Priority-Medium Release5.2.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@GoogleCodeExporter