Introduction

I wrote a small coverage analysis utility: odf2html/trunk/tests/coverage.py.

It runs from within tests subdirectory and requires Python and built all-in-one.xsl.

Any suggestions are appreciated.

Here are it's run results against all-in-one.xsl rev.292 :

Details

./coverage.py
Fetching all element/attribute names from OpenDocument schema: 524 elements, 1130 attributes fetched
Fetching supported elements/attributes from odf2html XSL: 89 elements, 97 attributes

Overall elements coverage: 16.98%, attributes coverage: 8.58%

Elements coverage:
text: 29 of 169 (17.16%)
style: 18 of 39 (46.15%)
office: 13 of 26 (50.00%)
table: 10 of 94 (10.64%)
draw: 6 of 44 (13.64%)
dc: 5 of 6 (83.33%)
meta: 3 of 14 (21.43%)
number: 3 of 26 (11.54%)
presentation: 1 of 20 (5.00%)
svg: 1 of 9 (11.11%)
anim: 0 of 12 (0.00%)
chart: 0 of 21 (0.00%)
config: 0 of 5 (0.00%)
dr3d: 0 of 6 (0.00%)
form: 0 of 30 (0.00%)
math: 0 of 1 (0.00%)
script: 0 of 1 (0.00%)
xforms: 0 of 1 (0.00%)

Attributes coverage:
fo: 33 of 58 (56.90%)
style: 21 of 184 (11.41%)
table: 13 of 155 (8.39%)
text: 9 of 133 (6.77%)
meta: 7 of 15 (46.67%)
draw: 6 of 200 (3.00%)
svg: 5 of 64 (7.81%)
office: 1 of 20 (5.00%)
presentation: 1 of 52 (1.92%)
xlink: 1 of 5 (20.00%)
<no namespace>: 0 of 5 (0.00%)
anim: 0 of 11 (0.00%)
chart: 0 of 61 (0.00%)
config: 0 of 2 (0.00%)
dr3d: 0 of 40 (0.00%)
form: 0 of 68 (0.00%)
number: 0 of 24 (0.00%)
script: 0 of 3 (0.00%)
smil: 0 of 29 (0.00%)
xforms: 0 of 1 (0.00%)

Totally ignored namespaces: anim, chart, config, dr3d, form, math, script, xforms