Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

obolib-obo2owl revision 71 conversion fails #9

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 12, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

obolib-obo2owl revision 71 conversion fails #9

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 12, 2015 · 3 comments
Labels
auto-migrated Priority-Medium Type-Defect

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link 



What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. obolib-obo2owl revision 71, conversion of caro.obo revision 1.5 (obo 
sourceforge CVS) fails with error:

log4j:WARN No such property [maxFileSize] in org.apache.log4j.FileAppender.
processing arg: /repositories/OBO_CVS/obo/ontology/anatomy/caro/caro.obo
processing arg: -o
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
    at org.obolibrary.obo2owl.Owl2Obo.getIdentifier(Owl2Obo.java:557)
    at org.obolibrary.obo2owl.Owl2Obo.getOntologyId(Owl2Obo.java:426)
    at org.obolibrary.cli.OBORunner.main(OBORunner.java:161)




2. But conversion using revision 62 works fine

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dosu...@gmail.com on 26 Feb 2011 at 10:58
@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author 

Sorry. Realized this is a non-issue. This just seems to be change in 
requirement for header tag:value pair 'ontology: namespace'.  Kinda obvious 
from the classes named in the STDERR I guess.

 I'd close the ticket, but it doesn't look like I have the privileges to be able to do so.

Original comment by dosu...@gmail.com on 27 Feb 2011 at 11:12

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author 

I'll leave this open as we clearly need clearer error messages.

also the fact it's owl2obo seems odd..

Original comment by cmung...@gmail.com on 28 Feb 2011 at 9:22

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by shahid.m...@gmail.com on 16 Jun 2011 at 6:12

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
auto-migrated Priority-Medium Type-Defect
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@GoogleCodeExporter