You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The notation ws* is introduced but not defined. As section 2.1 table 1 says
zero or more will be noted with curly braces, it would probably make more sense
to use {ws} instead of ws*. SImilarly for nl* in the section 2.2 above.
I am not sure how to define a Qualifier. Maybe something along the lines of "A
Qualifier expresses a relationship between the object of the annotation and a
well-defined semantic entity." from
http://code.google.com/p/annotation-ontology/wiki/Qualifiers
Maybe having an example of OBO file with different elements examplified and
named would help? Maybe as an annex to the spec?
Original issue reported on code.google.com by mcour...@gmail.com on 14 Dec 2011 at 7:00
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ws issue fixed.
I've tried to avoid giving too much semantics in the syntax section. Qualifiers
are really a mixed bag. Sometimes they are axiom annotations, sometimes they
alter the semantics of the tag in which they are embedded (e.g. cardinality).
But even just saying something like "qualifiers can represent axiom
annotations" means we have to get into axioms and annotations in the OWL
sense...
Examples for each of the sections would be a good idea. I'll leave this issue
open for now.
Original comment by cmung...@gmail.com on 17 Dec 2011 at 12:36
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mcour...@gmail.com
on 14 Dec 2011 at 7:00The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: