Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

System Complexity displays more than the classes in the group #516

Closed
seandenigris opened this issue Aug 3, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

System Complexity displays more than the classes in the group #516

seandenigris opened this issue Aug 3, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor

Originally reported on Google Code with ID 516

Currently, the algorithm to identify the hierarchies does not limit the result to the
current class group, but it takes all the subclasses of the superclass. This means
that if you have a group with Object inside, you will end up with a system complexity
with all classes.

Reported by tudor.girba on 2011-02-04 14:55:24

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is this still true?
I tried to:
1- import the AST-Core* categories in Moose
2- Open the System complexity on all the Model Classes
3- Then i tried to open the System complexity again on all classes but RBReplaceRule,
RBSearchRule, RBBlockReplaceRule, RBStringReplaceRule (which are all the subclasses
of RBParseTreeRule)

In the second visualization the RBParseTreeRule tree disappear and the class RBParseTreeRule
was shown into the lonely classes group. Is it solved or i did not get the point of
the issue?

Reported by fabrizio.perin on 2011-09-24 16:49:51

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author

This was solved by using a simple system complexity. If you call the more complex system
complexity code (the one that provides the grouping of hierarchies), the problem is
still there.

Try this on a class group:

| view |
view := MOViewRenderer new.
self viewSystemComplexityOn: view.
view open

Reported by tudor.girba on 2012-03-20 06:55:59

  • Labels added: Component-Finder

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reported by tudor@tudorgirba.com on 2013-11-11 05:25:05

  • Status changed: Fixed

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reported by tudor@tudorgirba.com on 2013-11-11 05:25:19

  • Labels added: Milestone-5.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant