Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Explicit port references in Glamour #473

Closed
seandenigris opened this issue Aug 3, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Explicit port references in Glamour #473

seandenigris opened this issue Aug 3, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor

Originally reported on Google Code with ID 473

from:, and to: should take explicit PortReferences instead of Association. For simplicity,
we would have:

GLMPortReference
- portName
- paneName

Symbol>>asGlamourOriginPortReference
Symbol>>asGlamourTargetPortReference

Association>>asGlamourOriginPortReference
Association>>asGlamourTargetPortReference

Reported by tudor.girba on 2010-10-24 23:54:55
@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author 

fixed.

Name: Glamour-Core-tg.144
Author: tg
Time: 25 October 2010, 2:37:20 am
UUID: 5be3f6e8-7c28-4a62-a5ec-a068de076b8d
Ancestors: Glamour-Core-tg.143

introduced PortIdentifier in the core mechanism of resolving ports. from now on, one
can also pass port identifiers in the scripts.

Reported by tudor.girba on 2010-10-25 00:38:53

  • Status changed: Fixed

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reported by tudor.girba on 2011-02-06 17:45:25

  • Labels added: Milestone-4.3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@seandenigris