Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Smalltalk importer should import Pragmas as annotations #408

Closed
seandenigris opened this issue Aug 3, 2015 · 9 comments
Closed

Smalltalk importer should import Pragmas as annotations #408

seandenigris opened this issue Aug 3, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor

Originally reported on Google Code with ID 408

The Smalltalk importer should import Pragmas as FAMIX Annotations.

Reported by tudor.girba on 2010-05-29 22:30:51
@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author 

There isn't a 'FAMIXAnnotation' class in famix-core. Should we create one?  Or should
we use 'FAMIXAnnotationInstance' from Famix-java ?

Reported by cy.delaunay on 2010-06-23 14:00:55

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author 

We should use the one from FAMIX-Java and if it works, we promote that one to FAMIX-Core

Reported by tudor.girba on 2010-06-23 16:05:10

  • Labels added: Component-Famix

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author 

We should use the one from FAMIX-Java and if it works, we promote that one to FAMIX-Core

Reported by tudor.girba on 2010-06-23 16:05:10

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author 

Would anyone be interested in working with these? We need the information for writing
detections for Moose.

Reported by tudor.girba on 2011-07-24 14:57:34

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author 

Fixed. Finally :).

So, now we can analyze pragmas from within the parsed model.

Reported by tudor.girba on 2011-09-23 11:57:48

  • Labels added: Milestone-4.6

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author

Reported by tudor.girba on 2011-09-23 11:57:58

  • Status changed: Fixed

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author 

Ok doru so will you push annotation to core?
Because I was just using this exact attributes to package attributes :)

Reported by stephane.ducasse on 2011-09-23 12:47:33

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author 

Yes, we will move them into the Core.

I do not exactly understand what you were using it for though :)

Reported by tudor.girba on 2011-09-23 13:17:34

@seandenigris
Copy link
Contributor Author 

to test some <package: > :)
and understand how to fix the PragmaProcessor and friends.
Anyway. I tagged all the java extensions with <package: #Java>

Reported by stephane.ducasse on 2011-09-23 20:05:47

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@seandenigris