You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 21, 2023. It is now read-only.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Checking page with filters in .conf file.
2. Checking page with filters by query parameter...
3. The problem is that I've got more points on Google PageSpeed Insights when
I've turn the same filters by query parameter.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I don't know why, but I've got more points on Google PageSpeed Insights when I
check my website with filters enabled by putting them in query parameter. Why
it is done? And the second questions is, why one of my .css file isn't rewrited
when the other are (that one .css is in other folder, but it should be rewrited
too, shouldn't it?)?
What version of the product are you using (please check X-Mod-Pagespeed
header)?
1.2.24.1-2581
On what operating system?
Debian 6 Squeeze
Which version of Apache?
2.4
Original issue reported on code.google.com by foctr...@gmail.com on 7 Apr 2013 at 10:21
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I wonder if this may be linked to issue 667 - ie. some of your filters are
actually enabled by default, but the line:
ModPagespeedEnableFilters xxx
is actually then disabling filter xxx !!
Original comment by rwap.services on 8 Apr 2013 at 9:08
Per comments in Issue 667, ModPagespeedEnableFilters is not supposed to toggle,
and we haven't seen any evidence yet suggesting that it does.
Could it be something in your pagespeed.conf or .htaccess files that's causing
filters to be disabled you are not expecting?
Also, note that mod_pagespeed optimizes resources in the background, and stores
them in the cache. For short-expiring resources on not-frequently-accessed
pages (e.g. debug or staging servers) you may have to refresh a few times to
see optimized results.
Original comment by jmara...@google.com on 8 Apr 2013 at 1:29
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
foctr...@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2013 at 10:21The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: