Original comment by matterb...@google.com on 30 Jun 2014 at 1:38

This would also make our regular release process a lot easier.

Original comment by jefftk@google.com on 4 Aug 2014 at 5:48

We're now building nightly on modpagespeed.com/buildbots and running tests, but these builds aren't succeeding consistently. Once they are we can make the binaries available for download.

It would be easy enough to provide downloads to builds that pass tests.
One issue I'm thinking of is the signing/updating through package manager.
We could set up a ppa for the deb builds if people would want to stay on
the 'bleeding edge' and equivalent for rpm. Or maybe I'm just
misunderstanding the use case of providing the nightly binaries
On Apr 8, 2015 5:47 PM, "Jeff Kaufman" notifications@github.com wrote:

We're now building nightly on modpagespeed.com/buildbots and running
tests, but these builds aren't succeeding consistently. Once they are we
can make the binaries available for download.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#617 (comment)
.

What would you think of providing nightly builds that weren't signed, where instead the only security people had was downloading them over https?

(Which would require us getting and maintaining an https cert for modpagespeed.com, but that would be good to do anyway.)

I'd be fine with that. 👍

On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Jeff Kaufman notifications@github.com
wrote:

What would you think of providing nightly builds that weren't signed,
where instead the only security people had was downloading them over https?

Unsigned https-fetched nightlies sound about the right level of effort to
me. The folks using them will be pretty bleeding-edge.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#617 (comment)
.

(It's also the same level of protection we offer for source downloads.)