% I think this has been deprecated by the vertical skyline stuff. % shall we delete this regtest?

slur-script.ly - v2.11.37 handles slurs as described by
the text without needing the following overrides included in the test
snippet:

\override DynamicLineSpanner #'avoid-slur = #'outside \override DynamicLineSpanner #'avoid-slur = #'around \override DynamicLineSpanner #'avoid-slur = #'()

can we stop marking possibly outdated regtests as being priority-regression? These are not regression bugs, if they are bugs at all.

They're not "bugs", but they are "issues". I thought that issues with the regtests would qualify as priority-regression, but of course we'll follow your instructions about this and mark them as Low.

The issue is this: - I was Bug Meister for over a year. - Valentin is the new Bug Meister. - Stan has volunteered to check the regtests every time there's a new release.

If the three of us cannot understand what a regtest is supposed to test, that's an issue. I think that all these issues could be closed by adding a sentence or two to the texinfo description -- all we want to know is what the output should look like.

My initial intention was to open a single issue named "regtests modernization", or something, and mark them as Enhancement-Low priority (since they are currently working, it's not really a bug nor a defect, it's just about a possible facelift).

Regards, Valentin

Joe,

can you do something about this bugreport? Perhaps the easiest is to just delete the tweaks shown.