issue 9
(Dual-licensing of library MIT/GPL) reported by hubert.lepicki
- Hi David,
We'd like to use your little library in our project, but have little
problem with licensing. Don't get me wrong, GPL v3 is great and I support
it (I am associate member of FSF!), but it's a bit problematic when applied
to JavaScript. It depends on interpretation, but most people would say that
using your library will force us to release all other JavaScript under GPL,
which we can't (some of it is properiaty).
Did you consider releasing under dual MIT / GPL licenses? It's how for
example how jQuery is licensed.
On the other hand, if forbidding us to use your library in this given
context is your intention, then I'm fine with that -- it's your right! :D
Please let me know what you think and if you can change licensing,
Take care,
Hubert
Hi David,
We'd like to use your little library in our project, but have little
problem with licensing. Don't get me wrong, GPL v3 is great and I support
it (I am associate member of FSF!), but it's a bit problematic when applied
to JavaScript. It depends on interpretation, but most people would say that
using your library will force us to release all other JavaScript under GPL,
which we can't (some of it is properiaty).
Did you consider releasing under dual MIT / GPL licenses? It's how for
example how jQuery is licensed.
On the other hand, if forbidding us to use your library in this given
context is your intention, then I'm fine with that -- it's your right! :D
Please let me know what you think and if you can change licensing,
Take care,
Hubert
Older
Oct 05, 2009
issue 8
(possibly typo @ line 184 googlemaps.js) reported by kampar
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. try to reload the page for several times or press escape
2. failed on geocoding
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Line: 184
Error: Object expected
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Please provide any additional information below.
when I change it into
markers[index] = null;
it's work as espected
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. try to reload the page for several times or press escape
2. failed on geocoding
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Line: 184
Error: Object expected
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Please provide any additional information below.
when I change it into
markers[index] = null;
it's work as espected
Jul 07, 2009
issue 7
(Zoom Levels) reported by matthew.david.brennan
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. set zoom level
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
change zoom level on rendered map
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
latest 1.3
Please provide any additional information below.
Setting the zoom: property doesn't seem to actually change the zoom of the
map when given a specific street address. It seems to be locked in to
whatever the default is.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. set zoom level
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
change zoom level on rendered map
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
latest 1.3
Please provide any additional information below.
Setting the zoom: property doesn't seem to actually change the zoom of the
map when given a specific street address. It seems to be locked in to
whatever the default is.
Jun 12, 2009
issue 6
([PATCH] Bugfixes/compatibility changes) reported by standingdog08
- I had to make the following changes to keep the code from erroring in Safari.
Also, it looks like the html configuration value didn't do anything, so I
added some code to implement it (see attached file).
Thanks for your time.
Josh Zerin
Senior Developer
Standing Dog Interactive
josh.zerin@standingdog.com
I had to make the following changes to keep the code from erroring in Safari.
Also, it looks like the html configuration value didn't do anything, so I
added some code to implement it (see attached file).
Thanks for your time.
Josh Zerin
Senior Developer
Standing Dog Interactive
josh.zerin@standingdog.com
May 18, 2009
issue 5
(little typo) reported by jf.viguier
- There is a little bug in revision 5 line 140 :
self.trace("processing address: [" + addresses[i] + "] (" + index + ")");
sould be
self.trace("processing address: [" + addresses[index] + "] (" + index + ")");
There is a little bug in revision 5 line 140 :
self.trace("processing address: [" + addresses[i] + "] (" + index + ")");
sould be
self.trace("processing address: [" + addresses[index] + "] (" + index + ")");
May 13, 2009
issue 4
(plugin fails gracelessly if container element has no ID attr...) reported by mich...@rosstechassociates.com
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. googlemaps plugin fails with 'a is null' error if selected container
element does not have an ID attribute.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
1.00 on xp pro
Please provide any additional information below.
I have a page listing specific places, with hidden divs that each contain a
div that will be the target of a googlemaps call. Divs generated without
ID's -- they are easily selectable with jquery without them. Probably the
issue here is that the google maps API requires a string ID of the
container. Even if that's true, given that your plugin exists to facilitate
easy access to the API, you should make it clear that an ID is required on
any element that your plugin is bound to. Or find some way to gracefully
handle the situation. I probably sound crabby...apologies. Took hours to
track down the issue...
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. googlemaps plugin fails with 'a is null' error if selected container
element does not have an ID attribute.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
1.00 on xp pro
Please provide any additional information below.
I have a page listing specific places, with hidden divs that each contain a
div that will be the target of a googlemaps call. Divs generated without
ID's -- they are easily selectable with jquery without them. Probably the
issue here is that the google maps API requires a string ID of the
container. Even if that's true, given that your plugin exists to facilitate
easy access to the API, you should make it clear that an ID is required on
any element that your plugin is bound to. Or find some way to gracefully
handle the situation. I probably sound crabby...apologies. Took hours to
track down the issue...
Apr 27, 2009
issue 3
(ln 140; undefined variable; i >> index;) commented on by showqiang
- change i to index
change i to index
Mar 27, 2009
issue 3
(ln 140; undefined variable; i >> index;) reported by goo...@denial.co.uk
- ln 140.
self.trace("processing address: [" + addresses[i] + "] (" + index + ")");
>
self.trace("processing address: [" + addresses[index] + "] (" + index
+ ")");
issue 2
(Custom icons) reported by david.g.hong
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. You cannot initialise googlemap plugin using custom icons
Need to allow users to put in custom marker icons, and tie them to an
address (or coordinates in the future).
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. You cannot initialise googlemap plugin using custom icons
Need to allow users to put in custom marker icons, and tie them to an
address (or coordinates in the future).
Mar 11, 2009
issue 1
(Marker zoom functionality) reported by david.g.hong
- What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Load the map with couple of addresses that are close to each other
2. Click on the marker
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
"Zoomed-in" action from the initial zoom-level. However, the zoom-level is
based on the constant (fixed) which could mean a zoom-out if there are
markers close to each other.
Technical information:
The function googlemap.optimiseZoomLevel optimises the map's current zoom
level based on the marker positions. Therefore, if there are markers close
to each other, then the zoom level is significantly higher than usual.
Sometimes taking a value greater than the constant set (15) as the marker's
zoom level.
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Load the map with couple of addresses that are close to each other
2. Click on the marker
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
"Zoomed-in" action from the initial zoom-level. However, the zoom-level is
based on the constant (fixed) which could mean a zoom-out if there are
markers close to each other.
Technical information:
The function googlemap.optimiseZoomLevel optimises the map's current zoom
level based on the marker positions. Therefore, if there are markers close
to each other, then the zoom level is significantly higher than usual.
Sometimes taking a value greater than the constant set (15) as the marker's
zoom level.
Mar 08, 2009
r5
(- geocode function has been extended to produce more helpful...) committed by david.g.hong
- - geocode function has been extended to produce more helpful debug messages
- geocode function has been extended to produce more helpful debug messages
Mar 07, 2009
r4
(- GetLatLng replaced with GetLocations, better geocoding han...) committed by david.g.hong
- - GetLatLng replaced with GetLocations, better geocoding handler
- GetLatLng replaced with GetLocations, better geocoding handler
