Today

• 2 hours ago

  issue 2583 (BlobInfo constructor doesn't raise TypeError) reported by harry@microwayes.net   -   Please describe the Python SDK- or runtime-related bug you're experiencing: The BlobInfo constructor is missing the raise keyword for the TypeError it creates.

  Please describe the Python SDK- or runtime-related bug you're experiencing: The BlobInfo constructor is missing the raise keyword for the TypeError it creates.
• 14 hours ago

  issue 1734 (NetBeans support for Google App Engine not documented here) commented on by jrichards3   -   Please support Netbeans because I would love to support AppEngine.

  Please support Netbeans because I would love to support AppEngine.
• 15 hours ago

  issue 965 (Mails wih attachments with Content ID and MIME Multipart/Rel...) commented on by mnrngsk   -   I cannot send the HTML mail with inline image, and cannot send the HTML mail with attachement file, too. (I could send the plain text mail with an attachment image and HTML mail without attachment file) Is there no way to send a HTML mail with attachment image ?

  I cannot send the HTML mail with inline image, and cannot send the HTML mail with attachement file, too. (I could send the plain text mail with an attachment image and HTML mail without attachment file) Is there no way to send a HTML mail with attachment image ?
• 16 hours ago

  issue 113 (wildcard subdomains on custom hosts) commented on by emur...@yahoo.com   -   I will also need wildcard subdomains on my custom domain in order to use GAE for my app. I currently have my app running GAE, but the subdomain issue is a show stopper.

  I will also need wildcard subdomains on my custom domain in order to use GAE for my app. I currently have my app running GAE, but the subdomain issue is a show stopper.

Yesterday

• 25 hours ago

  issue 2582 (More Control over MemCache) reported by Michael.K.Klocker   -   This feature request is initiated based one the functionality I would like on GAE for Java. I would like to have more control/insight over the entries within MemCache. This includes: 1.) A new menu item in the admin console, similar to the one for the DataStore that show me statistics over how many entries I have in MemCache, how much space they take up combined, when the last get/getAll/put/putAll happened, and maybe what object types that the values and/or keys have. 2.) Probably even more important than the first feature would be more control over MemCache in general. Here a real life example from my app. I tried to cache 32,000 entries in MemCache for faster access. Due to the size limitation of 1MB per put/putAll, I did multiple putAll's after each other in a loop, only to find out that after the last one was done, entries of the first iteration have already been evicted again (probably due to memory pressure) before I was ever able to use/access them. I would be absolutely o.k. to have a Memory/MemCache quota (size and/or number of entries) and to pay for more/bigger MemCache sizes. What I asking for is simply to have more control over how much (number of entities and size of MemCache in total) I would like to store in MemCache and what gets evicted first (if eviction is necessary at some point - like a priority). Currently the great service of MemCache is unfortunately of no use to me because my amount of data or number of entries (or both - I really don't know) seems to be too big. 3.) Last but not least, please remove the difference in API speed for get/put/getAll/putAll between Python and Java. 4 or 5 ms in Python is great, but 14/16 in Java is less than ideal. If this can not be fixed, let us at least clarify on the GAE status chart that the times are different, so that developers have transparency about this (it took me a while to figure it out).

  This feature request is initiated based one the functionality I would like on GAE for Java. I would like to have more control/insight over the entries within MemCache. This includes: 1.) A new menu item in the admin console, similar to the one for the DataStore that show me statistics over how many entries I have in MemCache, how much space they take up combined, when the last get/getAll/put/putAll happened, and maybe what object types that the values and/or keys have. 2.) Probably even more important than the first feature would be more control over MemCache in general. Here a real life example from my app. I tried to cache 32,000 entries in MemCache for faster access. Due to the size limitation of 1MB per put/putAll, I did multiple putAll's after each other in a loop, only to find out that after the last one was done, entries of the first iteration have already been evicted again (probably due to memory pressure) before I was ever able to use/access them. I would be absolutely o.k. to have a Memory/MemCache quota (size and/or number of entries) and to pay for more/bigger MemCache sizes. What I asking for is simply to have more control over how much (number of entities and size of MemCache in total) I would like to store in MemCache and what gets evicted first (if eviction is necessary at some point - like a priority). Currently the great service of MemCache is unfortunately of no use to me because my amount of data or number of entries (or both - I really don't know) seems to be too big. 3.) Last but not least, please remove the difference in API speed for get/put/getAll/putAll between Python and Java. 4 or 5 ms in Python is great, but 14/16 in Java is less than ideal. If this can not be fixed, let us at least clarify on the GAE status chart that the times are different, so that developers have transparency about this (it took me a while to figure it out).
• 25 hours ago

  issue 2576 (Socket Support Feature Request) commented on by aidamina   -   @sam.hasler No it's not duplicate, since the other feature request talks about a WebSocket implementation, which is a high level implementation of socket functionality, subject to a number of security restrictions. This feature request talks about low level tcp and possibly udp socket support, letting users themselves create an authentication/verification system.

  @sam.hasler No it's not duplicate, since the other feature request talks about a WebSocket implementation, which is a high level implementation of socket functionality, subject to a number of security restrictions. This feature request talks about low level tcp and possibly udp socket support, letting users themselves create an authentication/verification system.
• 26 hours ago

  issue 2579 (WebSocket support) commented on by sam.hasler   -   this is a duplicate of Issue 2535

  this is a duplicate of Issue 2535
• 26 hours ago

  issue 2578 (WebSocket support) commented on by sam.hasler   -   this is a duplicate of Issue 2535

  this is a duplicate of Issue 2535
• 26 hours ago

  issue 2576 (Socket Support Feature Request) commented on by sam.hasler   -   this is a duplicate of Issue 2535

  this is a duplicate of Issue 2535
• 33 hours ago

  issue 2581 ([Doc] webapp Blobstore Handlers - weapp -> webapp) reported by sylvain.vivien   -   Here : http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/webapp/blobstorehandlers.html replace weapp -> webapp In both example : * BlobstoreUploadHandler * BlobstoreDownloadHandler from google.appengine.ext.[[weapp]] import blobstore_handlers from google.appengine.ext.[[weapp]].util import run_wsgi_app

  Here : http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/webapp/blobstorehandlers.html replace weapp -> webapp In both example : * BlobstoreUploadHandler * BlobstoreDownloadHandler from google.appengine.ext.[[weapp]] import blobstore_handlers from google.appengine.ext.[[weapp]].util import run_wsgi_app
• 35 hours ago

  issue 1296 (Add maven support) commented on by sramanandi   -   +1 for maven support. This is the most important feature for most of the java projects. Right now most of the projects uses Mavan and its too much of work to get them run on GAE. Please provide a gae maven plugin that can build/deploy/run local server, import logs,indexes and datanucles enhancer. This is the the feature for which I am waiting since a long. Hope one day google will release this. Thanks

  +1 for maven support. This is the most important feature for most of the java projects. Right now most of the projects uses Mavan and its too much of work to get them run on GAE. Please provide a gae maven plugin that can build/deploy/run local server, import logs,indexes and datanucles enhancer. This is the the feature for which I am waiting since a long. Hope one day google will release this. Thanks
• 39 hours ago

  issue 2580 (Task queue rate limitation configuration requirements make g...) reported by lhoriman   -   In SDK 1.2.8, the task queue rate limitation mechanism changed and now queue rates must add up to 20/s. We understand the goal of limiting aggregate rate limits to 20/s, but this particular way to do it severely restricts the utility of the rate limits. In the real world, tasks generally fall into one of two categories: 1) Tasks that should be processed at some reasonably slow rate 2) Tasks that should be processed as fast as possible What this means is that real-world users want to configure queues like this: <queue><name>slowThing</name><rate>5/s</rate></queue> <queue><name>slowerThing</name><rate>3/s</rate></queue> <queue><name>fastgroup1</name><rate>20/s</rate></queue> // the max <queue><name>fastgroup2</name><rate>20/s</rate></queue> // the max Assuming all queues are fully populated, the rate limit would still be restricted by the system to be 20/s. The specific priorities may be undefined, but that's fine. The problem with the current approach (requiring all rates to add up to 20/s) is that: 1) If you have slow queues, it limits the total speed of the fast queue - even when there are no items in the slow queues. 2) It makes queues useless for logical grouping. The #2 issue is a big one for those of us using the Deferred servlet. In this case, there is no visible way to discern what stalled/erroring tasks in the queue are actually doing since they are all lumped into the same queue. The only way to create three task queues for three different activities is to split the total rate between all three - not practical when you have bursty sessions which tend to only use one queue at a time. Please allow all queues to be specified with the max (20/s) rate and then restrict the aggregate rate on the backend. Thanks.

  In SDK 1.2.8, the task queue rate limitation mechanism changed and now queue rates must add up to 20/s. We understand the goal of limiting aggregate rate limits to 20/s, but this particular way to do it severely restricts the utility of the rate limits. In the real world, tasks generally fall into one of two categories: 1) Tasks that should be processed at some reasonably slow rate 2) Tasks that should be processed as fast as possible What this means is that real-world users want to configure queues like this: <queue><name>slowThing</name><rate>5/s</rate></queue> <queue><name>slowerThing</name><rate>3/s</rate></queue> <queue><name>fastgroup1</name><rate>20/s</rate></queue> // the max <queue><name>fastgroup2</name><rate>20/s</rate></queue> // the max Assuming all queues are fully populated, the rate limit would still be restricted by the system to be 20/s. The specific priorities may be undefined, but that's fine. The problem with the current approach (requiring all rates to add up to 20/s) is that: 1) If you have slow queues, it limits the total speed of the fast queue - even when there are no items in the slow queues. 2) It makes queues useless for logical grouping. The #2 issue is a big one for those of us using the Deferred servlet. In this case, there is no visible way to discern what stalled/erroring tasks in the queue are actually doing since they are all lumped into the same queue. The only way to create three task queues for three different activities is to split the total rate between all three - not practical when you have bursty sessions which tend to only use one queue at a time. Please allow all queues to be specified with the max (20/s) rate and then restrict the aggregate rate on the backend. Thanks.
• 40 hours ago

  issue 13 (PHP support is a must) commented on by wee493   -   PHP PLEASE!

  PHP PLEASE!
• 41 hours ago

  issue 1624 (Add Level 2 cache regions in GAE for Java) commented on by second.c...@gmail.com   -   +vote

  +vote
• 44 hours ago

  issue 13 (PHP support is a must) commented on by gonzomail   -   _____ _ _ _____ | __ \ | | | | | __ \ | |__) | | |__| | | |__) | | ___/ | __ | | ___/ | | | | | | | | |_| |_| |_| |_| Please! :]

  _____ _ _ _____ | __ \ | | | | | __ \ | |__) | | |__| | | |__) | | ___/ | __ | | ___/ | | | | | | | | |_| |_| |_| |_| Please! :]
• 44 hours ago

  issue 13 (PHP support is a must) commented on by gonzomail   -   I need PHP support. PLEASE :)

  I need PHP support. PLEASE :)
• 45 hours ago

  issue 1133 (Problem for bulkloader.py using PolyModel) commented on by seizethedave   -   Bump. This is an important bug, and the solution by webysther doesn't seem to work in v1.3.0.

  Bump. This is an important bug, and the solution by webysther doesn't seem to work in v1.3.0.
• 47 hours ago

  issue 822 (Log time in Admin Console is not universal ) commented on by patrick.jayet   -   I agree with the other people. It is annoying when looking at the logs to have to compute mentally the difference each time. It makes them a lot less usable.

  I agree with the other people. It is annoying when looking at the logs to have to compute mentally the difference each time. It makes them a lot less usable.

Last 7 days

• Dec 30, 2009

  issue 2579 (WebSocket support) reported by rodchyn   -   Please add WebSocket support in GAE

  Please add WebSocket support in GAE
• Dec 30, 2009

  issue 2578 (WebSocket support) reported by rodchyn   -   Please add WebSocket support to GAE

  Please add WebSocket support to GAE
• Dec 30, 2009

  issue 13 (PHP support is a must) commented on by rodchyn   -   Please add ruby, php and websocket support.

  Please add ruby, php and websocket support.
• Dec 30, 2009

  issue 2577 (Remote API queries sometimes return results in reverse order) commented on by robin.houston   -   As a workaround, it's possible to detect this situation and retry. I am using code of the following form, which appears to work: key = None while True: query = Entity.all().order('__key__') if key: logging.debug("Filtering __key__ > '%s'", str(key)) _ = query.filter('__key__ >', key) results = query.fetch(BATCH_SIZE) if len(results) > 1 and results[0].key() > results[1].key(): logging.warn("Results returned in reverse order. Retrying...") continue for result in results: ''' Do something with result. ''' if results: key = results[-1].key() logging.debug("New key is %s", key) else: logging.debug("Found nothing with key > '%s'", str(key)) break

  As a workaround, it's possible to detect this situation and retry. I am using code of the following form, which appears to work: key = None while True: query = Entity.all().order('__key__') if key: logging.debug("Filtering __key__ > '%s'", str(key)) _ = query.filter('__key__ >', key) results = query.fetch(BATCH_SIZE) if len(results) > 1 and results[0].key() > results[1].key(): logging.warn("Results returned in reverse order. Retrying...") continue for result in results: ''' Do something with result. ''' if results: key = results[-1].key() logging.debug("New key is %s", key) else: logging.debug("Found nothing with key > '%s'", str(key)) break
• Dec 30, 2009

  issue 2577 (Remote API queries sometimes return results in reverse order) reported by robin.houston   -   I am encountering a problem where remote queries (using the remote API) sporadically return their results in the reverse order from that requested. I'm using order('__key__') in conjunction with filter('__key__ >', previous_key) to page through the results, and sometimes, unpredictably, the last batch of results is returned instead in reverse order. This happens frequently enough that I can't page through 7000 entities in batches of 100 without the loop terminating prematurely due to this problem. Another user has reported the same symptoms on the Google App Engine group: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/62ae96ef9dea3475

  I am encountering a problem where remote queries (using the remote API) sporadically return their results in the reverse order from that requested. I'm using order('__key__') in conjunction with filter('__key__ >', previous_key) to page through the results, and sometimes, unpredictably, the last batch of results is returned instead in reverse order. This happens frequently enough that I can't page through 7000 entities in batches of 100 without the loop terminating prematurely due to this problem. Another user has reported the same symptoms on the Google App Engine group: http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/62ae96ef9dea3475
• Dec 30, 2009

  issue 2576 (Socket Support Feature Request) reported by aidamina   -   As the developer of jsocket I've been looking with great interest at the recent developments around Google Chrome. More specifically the WebSocket feature has caught my attention. It seems that Google has realized the lack of statefulness of http and performance problems of keeping a streaming http connection up. With that in mind I would like you to consider to implement a system for accepting and handling socket connections(at the very least over tcp) to support this latest feature. Being able to create a live data stream without using XmlHttpRequests should also decrease the overhead that continues http requests cause on the server. Of course I realize that the current quota system doesn't quite provide an easy way to implement this, and most likely this will require an additional resource pool. But I do think that this is the way of the future. jsocket: http://code.google.com/p/jsocket/ Chromium WebSocket: http://blog.chromium.org/2009/12/web-sockets-now-available-in-google.html

  As the developer of jsocket I've been looking with great interest at the recent developments around Google Chrome. More specifically the WebSocket feature has caught my attention. It seems that Google has realized the lack of statefulness of http and performance problems of keeping a streaming http connection up. With that in mind I would like you to consider to implement a system for accepting and handling socket connections(at the very least over tcp) to support this latest feature. Being able to create a live data stream without using XmlHttpRequests should also decrease the overhead that continues http requests cause on the server. Of course I realize that the current quota system doesn't quite provide an easy way to implement this, and most likely this will require an additional resource pool. But I do think that this is the way of the future. jsocket: http://code.google.com/p/jsocket/ Chromium WebSocket: http://blog.chromium.org/2009/12/web-sockets-now-available-in-google.html
• Dec 30, 2009

  issue 2575 (No support of List.add(index, element) on a list backed by J...) reported by Piotr.Tarsa   -   Error log here: http://pastie.org/760770 Sources are here: http://code.google.com/p/data- compression/source/browse/#hg/src/java/com/datacompressionexplained List.add(element) works fine. Only List.add(index, element) fails.

  Error log here: http://pastie.org/760770 Sources are here: http://code.google.com/p/data- compression/source/browse/#hg/src/java/com/datacompressionexplained List.add(element) works fine. Only List.add(index, element) fails.
• Dec 30, 2009

  issue 1714 (BadRequestError: Too big query offset.) commented on by p...@volpato.net   -   It's now 4000... still why is there such a thing as a max query offset? How does one get the data beyond whatever the maximum is?

  It's now 4000... still why is there such a thing as a max query offset? How does one get the data beyond whatever the maximum is?
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 2574 (test) Status changed by apija...@google.com   -  

  Status: Invalid

  Status: Invalid
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 2574 (test) reported by jasonaco...@google.com   -   *********************************************************************** This issue template is specifically for PRODUCTION ISSUES that require App Engine team intervention to resolve. These include the following: - Stuck indexes -- one or more deployed indexes is perpetually in the "Building" state - Quota denials -- your billing-enabled application is throwing quota- related errors (typically 403 Forbidden status codes) - General serving issues -- your application is throwing 500 errors or other error codes with no explanation in your error logs Any other non-production issues will be closed and reporters will be referred to the discussion forums listed in http://code.google.com/appengine/community.html. *********************************************************************** REQUIRED: Application ID (e.g. <appid>.appspot.com): test REQUIRED: Detailed description of the production issue you're experiencing: test

  *********************************************************************** This issue template is specifically for PRODUCTION ISSUES that require App Engine team intervention to resolve. These include the following: - Stuck indexes -- one or more deployed indexes is perpetually in the "Building" state - Quota denials -- your billing-enabled application is throwing quota- related errors (typically 403 Forbidden status codes) - General serving issues -- your application is throwing 500 errors or other error codes with no explanation in your error logs Any other non-production issues will be closed and reporters will be referred to the discussion forums listed in http://code.google.com/appengine/community.html. *********************************************************************** REQUIRED: Application ID (e.g. <appid>.appspot.com): test REQUIRED: Detailed description of the production issue you're experiencing: test
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 2573 (test) Status changed by apija...@google.com   -  

  Status: Invalid

  Status: Invalid
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 2573 (test) reported by jasonaco...@google.com   -   *********************************************************************** This issue template is specifically for PRODUCTION ISSUES that require App Engine team intervention to resolve. These include the following: - Stuck indexes -- one or more deployed indexes is perpetually in the "Building" state - Quota denials -- your billing-enabled application is throwing quota- related errors (typically 403 Forbidden status codes) - General serving issues -- your application is throwing 500 errors or other error codes with no explanation in your error logs Any other non-production issues will be closed and reporters will be referred to the discussion forums listed in http://code.google.com/appengine/community.html. *********************************************************************** REQUIRED: Application ID (e.g. <appid>.appspot.com): test REQUIRED: Detailed description of the production issue you're experiencing: test

  *********************************************************************** This issue template is specifically for PRODUCTION ISSUES that require App Engine team intervention to resolve. These include the following: - Stuck indexes -- one or more deployed indexes is perpetually in the "Building" state - Quota denials -- your billing-enabled application is throwing quota- related errors (typically 403 Forbidden status codes) - General serving issues -- your application is throwing 500 errors or other error codes with no explanation in your error logs Any other non-production issues will be closed and reporters will be referred to the discussion forums listed in http://code.google.com/appengine/community.html. *********************************************************************** REQUIRED: Application ID (e.g. <appid>.appspot.com): test REQUIRED: Detailed description of the production issue you're experiencing: test
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 1269 (unique static ip per app/account (域名绑定独立 IP)) commented on by liuweiweiash   -   ...

  ...
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 113 (wildcard subdomains on custom hosts) commented on by bla...@blainegarrett.com   -   I'm waiting to migrate my django app over to GAE until this is implemented. Is there a way to raise the priority on this? Donations, code contributions, etc?

  I'm waiting to migrate my django app over to GAE until this is implemented. Is there a way to raise the priority on this? Donations, code contributions, etc?
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 664 (datetime.now() is off by several hours intermittently on Lin...) commented on by kumar.mcmillan   -   I am not using utcnow() anywhere in my app but now() is exhibiting this exact problem. i.e. it is correct the first time the page loads or after a touch but then it is off by 6 hours (I am in CST so perhaps it is misapplying the offset?). I am using Django so maybe Django is calling utcnow() somewhere I don't know about. I am also on Mac OS X so this affects more than just Linux. Is there any workaround? It is hard to test time dependent behavior in the SDK like this.

  I am not using utcnow() anywhere in my app but now() is exhibiting this exact problem. i.e. it is correct the first time the page loads or after a touch but then it is off by 6 hours (I am in CST so perhaps it is misapplying the offset?). I am using Django so maybe Django is calling utcnow() somewhere I don't know about. I am also on Mac OS X so this affects more than just Linux. Is there any workaround? It is hard to test time dependent behavior in the SDK like this.
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 1854 (Wrong SSL example:) Status changed by schwa...@google.com   -   This appears to have been fixed in the English documentation and the translations will be updated over time.

  Status: Fixed

  This appears to have been fixed in the English documentation and the translations will be updated over time.

  Status: Fixed
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 2262 (HttpSession is not cleared after user logs out) Status changed by schwa...@google.com   -   Sessions are orthogonal to authentication. They use separate cookies and unauthenticated requests can use sesssions. If you want to do this yourself you can have the continueURL for your logout link point to a servlet that calls HttpSession.invalidate(). If I'm missing something please reply and I'll reopen.

  Status: Invalid

  Sessions are orthogonal to authentication. They use separate cookies and unauthenticated requests can use sesssions. If you want to do this yourself you can have the continueURL for your logout link point to a servlet that calls HttpSession.invalidate(). If I'm missing something please reply and I'll reopen.

  Status: Invalid
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 2242 (web.xml parser doesn't remove newlines/whitespace) changed by schwa...@google.com   -  

  Status: Accepted

  Labels: log-2348136

  Status: Accepted

  Labels: log-2348136
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 1898 (Update web.xml files in templates to use the Servlet 2.5 XSD) Status changed by schwa...@google.com   -  

  Status: Fixed

  Status: Fixed
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 2013 (Requests not matching web.xml URL patterns) Status changed by schwa...@google.com   -   I believe you both need to exclude your source files from <static-files> in appengine-web.xml. As described here, static files always take precedence over dynamic requests: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/gettingstarted/staticfiles.html Here are instructions on how to do this: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/appconfig.html#Static_Files_an d_Resource_Files

  Status: WontFix

  I believe you both need to exclude your source files from <static-files> in appengine-web.xml. As described here, static files always take precedence over dynamic requests: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/gettingstarted/staticfiles.html Here are instructions on how to do this: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/appconfig.html#Static_Files_an d_Resource_Files

  Status: WontFix
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 1656 (images.Composite error: "15 composites were supplied; the ma...) changed by schwa...@google.com   -  

  Status: Accepted

  Labels: log-2348091

  Status: Accepted

  Labels: log-2348091
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 1477 (web.xml error-page ignored in app engine) changed by schwa...@google.com   -  

  Status: Acknowledged

  Labels: log-1707687

  Status: Acknowledged

  Labels: log-1707687
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 2510 (Get hash of blob in blobstore) commented on by knoonan   -   Not just for identifying duplicates, but to guarantee the integrity of uploaded or downloaded data!

  Not just for identifying duplicates, but to guarantee the integrity of uploaded or downloaded data!
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 2572 (Blobstore size is wrong ( within App control panel -> Qouta ...) commented on by Aleksandrs.Livincovs   -   A bit later ( approximately after 40 mins ) Quota Details -> Blobstore Stored Data value was drooped from 1 gig to 0. Perhaps it is somehow related to __BlobUploadSession__ (at least such kind exists in dev environment) object release timeout.

  A bit later ( approximately after 40 mins ) Quota Details -> Blobstore Stored Data value was drooped from 1 gig to 0. Perhaps it is somehow related to __BlobUploadSession__ (at least such kind exists in dev environment) object release timeout.
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 2572 (Blobstore size is wrong ( within App control panel -> Qouta ...) reported by Aleksandrs.Livincovs   -   I've upgraded my application to start using a new blobstore features instead of Datastore blob object . Everything works fine except the value of Blobstore Stored Data field (Quota Details), It shows that application has consumed 1Gbytes of data however only 15Mb of data have been uploaded and only few tests were completed (no load tests, no stress tests were done).So seems like a bug. Perhaps frequent use of blobstore.create_upload_url might be the reason of the issue ? At least after I've commented out blobstore.create_upload_url , memory leaking seems stopped so far . Aleksandr

  I've upgraded my application to start using a new blobstore features instead of Datastore blob object . Everything works fine except the value of Blobstore Stored Data field (Quota Details), It shows that application has consumed 1Gbytes of data however only 15Mb of data have been uploaded and only few tests were completed (no load tests, no stress tests were done).So seems like a bug. Perhaps frequent use of blobstore.create_upload_url might be the reason of the issue ? At least after I've commented out blobstore.create_upload_url , memory leaking seems stopped so far . Aleksandr
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 2571 (203 Not authorised Error - Unable to deploy any new apps) reported by CameronNeylon   -   Hi Similar error to those others have seen before that generates a 203 "You do not have permision to modify this app". However it appears to have blocked me from deploying any new app at all. Example log output: *** Running appfg.py with the following flags: --no_cookies --email=cameronneylon@googlemail.com --passin update google_appengine/appcfg.py:41: DeprecationWarning: the sha module is deprecated; use the hashlib module instead os.path.join(DIR_PATH, 'lib', 'antlr3'), Application: paperhelper; version: 1. Server: appengine.google.com. Scanning files on local disk. Initiating update. Error 403: --- begin server output --- You do not have permission to modify this app (app_id=u'paperhelper'). --- end server output --- Password for cameronneylon@googlemail.com: If deploy fails you might need to 'rollback' manually. The "Make Symlinks..." menu option can help with command-line work. *** appcfg.py has finished with exit code 1 *** Things I have tried: Deploying from command line or SDK AppEngineLauncher (Mac OS 10.6, Using v 1.3.0.609 of GoogleAppEngineLauncher) On command line deploying with --no cookies option Deleting appcfg_cookies Checking name of app in app.yaml Replacing app.yaml with new "clean" version generated via SDK Deploying a completely new hello world app generated via the SDK Problem appeared to arise when: I tried to deploy an app that had capital letters in the app name in app.yaml which returned an error saying that name didn't match the required regex. After this I've been unable to deploy anything. I have accepted the recently changed T&Cs and can access the web dashboard. The apps I've attempted to deploy aren't visible there. Cheers Cameron

  Hi Similar error to those others have seen before that generates a 203 "You do not have permision to modify this app". However it appears to have blocked me from deploying any new app at all. Example log output: *** Running appfg.py with the following flags: --no_cookies --email=cameronneylon@googlemail.com --passin update google_appengine/appcfg.py:41: DeprecationWarning: the sha module is deprecated; use the hashlib module instead os.path.join(DIR_PATH, 'lib', 'antlr3'), Application: paperhelper; version: 1. Server: appengine.google.com. Scanning files on local disk. Initiating update. Error 403: --- begin server output --- You do not have permission to modify this app (app_id=u'paperhelper'). --- end server output --- Password for cameronneylon@googlemail.com: If deploy fails you might need to 'rollback' manually. The "Make Symlinks..." menu option can help with command-line work. *** appcfg.py has finished with exit code 1 *** Things I have tried: Deploying from command line or SDK AppEngineLauncher (Mac OS 10.6, Using v 1.3.0.609 of GoogleAppEngineLauncher) On command line deploying with --no cookies option Deleting appcfg_cookies Checking name of app in app.yaml Replacing app.yaml with new "clean" version generated via SDK Deploying a completely new hello world app generated via the SDK Problem appeared to arise when: I tried to deploy an app that had capital letters in the app name in app.yaml which returned an error saying that name didn't match the required regex. After this I've been unable to deploy anything. I have accepted the recently changed T&Cs and can access the web dashboard. The apps I've attempted to deploy aren't visible there. Cheers Cameron
• Dec 29, 2009

  issue 1268 (Consider adding ImageIO to the JVM White List) commented on by matthias.hueller   -   Yes... please add RichFaces support!

  Yes... please add RichFaces support!
• Dec 28, 2009

  issue 2570 (Can Not Delete Blobs Stored in Blobstore via Dashboard) reported by c...@gamegiants.net   -   Can Not Delete Blobs Stored in Blobstore via Dashboard results in server error

  Can Not Delete Blobs Stored in Blobstore via Dashboard results in server error
• Dec 28, 2009

  issue 1893 (vacuum_indexes not available) commented on by the1geek   -   An important appcfg command deprived from Java developers.

  An important appcfg command deprived from Java developers.
• Dec 28, 2009

  issue 1249 (welcome-file processing is different in Vanilla Jetty, dev_a...) changed by schwa...@google.com   -   <welcome-file>/index.jsp</welcome-file> is not valid according to the Servlet Spec, we should add validation for this to the DevAppServer.

  Status: Accepted

  Labels: log-2347398

  <welcome-file>/index.jsp</welcome-file> is not valid according to the Servlet Spec, we should add validation for this to the DevAppServer.

  Status: Accepted

  Labels: log-2347398
• Dec 28, 2009

  issue 99 (500 Server Error - report goes to Google Help) commented on by stephane.traumat   -   Hi... I get the same error on my application http://quatuo-web.appspot.com My application works well on my computer but i got the 500 error message when deployed and nothing in the logs... Except the request : 12-28 04:00PM 37.181 /profile/edit 500 9850ms 12cpu_ms 12api_cpu_ms 0kb Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.249.43 Safari/532.5,gzip(gfe) 84.98.78.48 - stephane.traumat [28/Dec/2009:16:00:47 -0800] "GET /profile/edit HTTP/1.1" 500 0 - "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.249.43 Safari/532.5,gzip(gfe)" I don't have any idea on how to debug this :(

  Hi... I get the same error on my application http://quatuo-web.appspot.com My application works well on my computer but i got the 500 error message when deployed and nothing in the logs... Except the request : 12-28 04:00PM 37.181 /profile/edit 500 9850ms 12cpu_ms 12api_cpu_ms 0kb Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.249.43 Safari/532.5,gzip(gfe) 84.98.78.48 - stephane.traumat [28/Dec/2009:16:00:47 -0800] "GET /profile/edit HTTP/1.1" 500 0 - "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.0.249.43 Safari/532.5,gzip(gfe)" I don't have any idea on how to debug this :(
• Dec 28, 2009

  issue 2527 (Please, Please, repackage asm classes in appengine-agentimpl...) Status changed by schwa...@google.com   -   How are you running the DevAppServer? This version of asm is isolated with a ClassLoader, but I could see this happening if you included your own version of ASM on the JRE's initial -classpath. Is that the case?

  Status: Acknowledged

  How are you running the DevAppServer? This version of asm is isolated with a ClassLoader, but I could see this happening if you included your own version of ASM on the JRE's initial -classpath. Is that the case?

  Status: Acknowledged