| Issue 102: | Please add jvm support, not just Java | |
| 217 people starred this issue and may be notified of changes. | Back to list |
This issue is read-only.
|
Let a thousand languages bloom... |
||||||||||||
,
Apr 10, 2008
Yes! I agree. JVM would make this rock! |
|||||||||||||
,
Apr 10, 2008
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: -Type-Defect Type-Feature
|
|||||||||||||
,
Apr 11, 2008
Full JVM, absolute - THAT would make an incredible impact - mark my words! |
|||||||||||||
,
Jun 04, 2008
How is Google reacting to these feature requests? Any thing AT ALL? |
|||||||||||||
,
Sep 25, 2008
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Status: Acknowledged
|
|||||||||||||
,
Oct 06, 2008
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: Component-Languages
|
|||||||||||||
,
Nov 03, 2008
Java would really take this cloud to the next heaven! ;-) |
|||||||||||||
,
Feb 08, 2009
I would argue that you'd want to go straight for spring support if possible. Simplifies the API specific code to write. |
|||||||||||||
,
Mar 05, 2009
JVM support, so that we can write GAE apps in Scala! |
|||||||||||||
,
Apr 07, 2009
Added with the new release of App Engine for Java. http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/2009/04/seriously-this-time-new-language-on- app.html
Status: Fixed
|
|||||||||||||
This issue is read-only. New comments cannot be added.